Precipitation Dataset for Statistical Post Processing and Downscaling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Precipitation Dataset for Statistical Post Processing and Downscaling

Description:

Create a historical precipitation dataset. Needs to be quality controlled ... 4-5 km resolution. Methods used to generate ... 15 km grid. Covers Canada and the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: emcNce
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Precipitation Dataset for Statistical Post Processing and Downscaling


1
Precipitation Dataset for Statistical Post
Processing and Downscaling
  • 29 November 2007

2
Goals
  • Create a historical precipitation dataset
  • Needs to be quality controlled
  • Needs to have a high spatial resolution
  • Use this climatic precipitation dataset to
    bias-correct GEFS and NAEFS precipitation
    forecasts (1 resolution)
  • Use this dataset to downscale precipitation
    forecasts to the high resolution NDFD grid (5 km
    resolution)
  • Compute climate statistics for precipitation

3
Dataset
U.S. Domain (downscaling and bias correction)
  • Combine information from two datasets
  • CPC precipitation analysis
  • Specifications
  • Daily
  • Since 2002
  • 1/8 resolution
  • 6-7 thousand daily reports
  • Methods used to generate
  • Uses inverse distance weighting for spatial
    interpolation of gages
  • PRISM climatology for incorporating orographic
  • Quality controlled (radar, satellite, station
    checks)
  • RFC QPE
  • Specifications
  • Every 6 hours
  • Since 2000
  • 4-5 km resolution
  • Methods used to generate
  • Combines rain gage data w/ radar data (Mountain
    Mapper in West)
  • Quality controlled by individual RFCs, then
    mosaicked.

4
Dataset
North American Domain (NAEFS)
  • Combine information from multiple sources
  • CMORPH
  • CPC ¼ Precipitation Analysis
  • Same as 1/8 dataset, except uses modified
    Cressman scheme to interpolate to grid
  • Canadian Precipitation Analysis (CaPA)
  • Specifications
  • 6-hourly
  • 15 km grid
  • Covers Canada and the U.S.
  • Methods
  • 6 hour forecast precip (GEM model) used as
    background
  • Adjusted with rain gauges and radar data
  • Being developed

5
Dataset
Global Domain (bias correction)
  • Combine information from multiple sources
  • CMORPH
  • Specifications
  • Every 30 minutes
  • Since late 2002
  • 8 km resolution
  • Methods used to generate
  • Precipitation estimates derived from low orbiter
    satellite microwave observations
  • Precipitation features transported using
    satellite infrared data, when microwave
    observations are not available
  • Issues
  • Poor estimates of precipitation over ice/snow
    cover
  • Only extends to 60 N/S
  • Will be replaced by RMORPH
  • Early next year (March?)
  • Incorporate rain gage data
  • Back to 2000 (maybe 1998?)

6
Dataset
Global Domain (bias correction) (continued)
  • GFS
  • Will fill in data missing from CMORPH dataset (gt
    60 N/S)
  • Use 12 hour forecast of 6-hour precipitation
    (between 6 and 12 hours after initialization).
  • Issues
  • Lower resolution
  • Not observed precipitation
  • Blending global and regional domains
  • Precipitation values in U.S. domain may differ
    between CMORPH and RFC QPE-CPC merged dataset
  • Should be better with RMORPH
  • For now, scale CMORPH toward higher resolution
    RFC QPE-CPC data, and incorporate Mexico/Canada
    CPC rain gage data to help scale CMORPH

7
Comparison
8
Combining Datasets
  • Methods similar to work by Ken Mitchell and
    Youlong Xia
  • Temporally disaggregated the 1/8 CPC
    precipitation analyses using Stage IV
    precipitation (http//www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/yl
    in/pcpanl/stage4/).
  • Maintained 24 hour totals from CPC precipitation,
    but added time variability from Stage IV
    precipitation.
  • Original Resolutions
  • CPC dataset 15 km resolution
  • RFC dataset 5 km resolution
  • NDFD 5 km resolution
  • Interpolate grids to make combining simple
  • RFC data ? 5 km NDFD grid
  • CPC data ? 15 km grid that fits exactly over the
    5 km NDFD grid

9
New Method First Interpolate Grids
CPC grid
RFC QPE grid
CPC grid fits exactly over RFC QPE grid (which
matches NDFD grid)
10
Scaling RFC QPE Against CPC
  • Step 1
  • CPC daily precip defined as precip from 12 UTC
    12 UTC
  • Sum 6-hourly RFC QPE over same period to obtain
    daily total

12-18 UTC
18-00 UTC
00-06 UTC
06-12 UTC
12-12 UTC
12-12 UTC
12-12 UTC
11
Scaling RFC QPE Against CPC
  • Step 2
  • Obtain average of all 9 points of RFC QPE grid
    within each CPC grid box
  • Obtain scaling factor (1/2 in this example)

12-12 UTC
12-12 UTC
Average 20
Scaling factor CPCval / RFCtot (1/2 in this
example)
12
Scaling RFC QPE Against CPC
  • Step 3
  • Scale each 6-hourly RFC QPE grid by the scaling
    factor obtained in step 2

12-18 UTC
18-00 UTC
00-06 UTC
06-12 UTC
½
12-18 UTC
18-00 UTC
00-06 UTC
06-12 UTC
13
End Result
  • 5-year precipitation dataset
  • 5 km resolution
  • Confident in values (CPC truth)
  • Already on NDFD grid
  • Already incorporates quality controls

14
Missing Data
  • Obtain average of all N points of RFC QPE grid
    within each CPC grid box, where N is the number
    of gridpoints with data
  • Obtain scaling factor (1/2 in this example)

12-12 UTC
12-12 UTC
  • Average SumAllGoodPoints / N 140/7 20
  • Scaling factor CPCval / RFCtot (1/2 in this
    example)
  • Perform step 3 as usual
  • For data missing across time dimension (eg. no
    data at 18 UTC), fill gridpoint with time-average
    of remaining points
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com