Title: Probing the Medium at RHIC via J Production
1Probing the Medium at RHIC via J/? Production
- Abigail Bickley
- University of Colorado
- November 10, 2005
2Phase Diagrams of Matter
3Cosmology
4Quantum Chromodynamics
Confinement
Asymptotic Freedom
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
- QCD potential between color carriers increases
with distance - Energy required to separate quark pair greater
than the rest mass of the pair
- QCD potential weak at small distances
- Quarks behave as if they are unbound
5Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
6Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
7Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
8The Ring
- 5x1026 cm-2s-1 store averaged luminosity
- 109 ions per bunch
- 45 bunches per fill
- 15 kHz collision rate
- 2 kHz PHENIX daq rate
9The Data
Run Species s1/2 GeV NTot
Data Size 01 AuAu 130 10M
3 TB 02 AuAu 200
170M 10 TB pp
200 3.7G 20 TB 03 dAu
200 5.5G 46 TB
pp 200 6.6G 35 TB
04 AuAu 200 1.5G 270 TB
AuAu 62 58M
10 TB 05 CuCu 200 8.6G
173 TB CuCu 62
0.4G 48 TB CuCu
22.5 9M 1 TB pp
200 85B 262 TB
10Collision Evolution
1 fm/c 3x10-24 seconds
11Collision Evolution
1 fm/c 3x10-24 seconds
12Collision Evolution
Quarks and gluons combine to form particles, but
inelastic collisions continue.
1 fm/c 3x10-24 seconds
13Collision Evolution
Inelastic collisions cease Final particle
yields fixed.
1 fm/c 3x10-24 seconds
14Collision Evolution
Elastic collisions cease Particles travel to
detector.
1 fm/c 3x10-24 seconds
15Global Properties of the Collision System
PHOBOS
- Multiplicity
- How many particles are generated?
- Pseudorapidity
- ? -ln tan(?/2)
16Collision Centrality
- Physically characterized by impact parameter
- BUT
- Not experimentally observable
17Collision Centrality
participant
spectator
- Npart the number of participating nucleons
(2-392, Au) - OR
- Ncoll the number of binary collisions (1-1200,
Au)
18J/?s in the Medium
- Quarkonia Production -
- hard scattering processes result in the
- production of heavy quark pairs that interact
- with the collision medium during hadronization
-
- In medium interactions convey information about
the fundamental properties of the medium itself -
- Competing effects are predicted to govern J/?
production - J/? color screening
- Suppression of J/? yield with increasing
collision centrality - J/? recombination
- Increased J/? yield with increasing collision
centrality - Narrowed J/? rapidity and pT distributions with
increasing centrality - Shadowing, Heavy quark energy loss, Normal
nuclear absorption, etc
19Early Predictions Matsui Satz
- J/? Suppression by Quark-Gluon Plasma Formation,
PLB 178, 461 (1986). - It is concluded that J/ ? suppression in nuclear
collisions should provide an unambiguous
signature of quark-gluon plasma formation. - Color screening
- Color charge of one quark masked by the
surrounding quarks - Prevents cc-bar binding in the interaction region
- Characterized by Debye screening radius (rD)
- If the screening radius is smaller than the J/ ?
radius then the quarks are effectively masked
from one another
rD
20Early Predictions Matsui Satz
- Both the screening and J/? radii are temperature
dependent - J/? radius (rJ/?)
- T0
- Radius dominated by confining potential
- 0.2 rJ/? 0.5 fm
- TTc
- Include color screened coulombic potential
- 0.5 rJ/? 1.3 fm
- Screening radius (rD)
- Calculated from lattice QCD
- Tc fixed at 200 MeV
- rD 0.2 fm
21Recombination
- J/? Suppression Models
- assume heavy quarkonia are formed only during the
initial hard nucleon-nucleon collisions - Subsequent interactions only result in additional
loss of yield - Recombination Models
- In central heavy ion collisions more than one
c-cbar pair is formed - Regeneration of J/? pairs possible from
independently produced c and cbars - Leads to an enhancement of J/? yield (or less
dramatic suppression)
22- Charm Anticharm Quark Production
23- Charm Anticharm Quark Production
- J/? Formation Models
24J/? ? hadrons 87.7
25J/? ? hadrons 87.7
26The PHENIX Experiment
27PHENIX Detector Muon Arms
- J/? ? ? ?-
- Reconstruct dimuon candidates at forward
rapidities - Coverage p gt 2GeV/c, 1.2 lt y lt 2.2, ???????
28PHENIX Detector Central Arm
- J/? ? e e-
- Reconstruct dielectron candidates at mid-rapidity
- Coverage p gt 0.2GeV/c, ? lt 0.35, ??????
29Lots of J/?s!
30Invariant Mass Plots
PHENIX
PHENIX
Raw J/? signal visible above the combinatorial
and physical background of like sign dimuon and
dielectron pairs
31Invariant Mass Plots
PHENIX
PHENIX
Raw J/? signal visible above the combinatorial
and physical background of like sign dimuon and
dielectron pairs
32Invariant Mass Plots
PHENIX
PHENIX
Like sign subtraction method used to isolate J/?
signal Integrate over mass range of 2.6-3.6
GeV/c2
33Acceptance Efficiency
PHENIX
- Detector geometrical coverage
- Detector hardware performance
- Trigger efficiency
- Reconstruction efficiency
34J/? Invariant Yield
35Comparing Systems and Energies
- PHENIX data
- AuAu 200GeV
- CuCu 200GeV
- CuCu 62GeV
- pp 200GeV
- dAu 200GeV
- Nuclear Modification Factor (RAA)
- Scale measured invariant yield by invariant yield
found in pp collisions at the same energy - Account for differing number of nucleons by
scaling by the number of binary collisions
36CuCu AuAu Data
37Nuclear Modification Factor
System size comparison at forward rapidity
38Nuclear Modification Factor
System size comparison at mid rapidity
39Nuclear Modification Factor
Rapidity comparison in AuAu 200 GeV
40Nuclear Modification Factor
Rapidity comparison in CuCu 200 GeV
41Nuclear Modification Factor
Energy comparison in CuCu 200 62 GeV
42CuCu Theory
43What do the theorists predict??
Theory Curves R. Vogt nucl-th/0507027
44What do the theorists predict??
Theory Curves R. Vogt nucl-th/0507027, A.
Capella hep-ph/0505032
45What do the theorists predict??
Theory Curves R. Vogt nucl-th/0507027, A.
Capella hep-ph/0505032
46AuAu Theory
47What do the theorists predict??
Cold nuclear matter models
48What do the theorists predict??
Suppression models w/o regeneration
49What do the theorists predict??
Suppression models with regeneration
50Rapidity Dependence
- Shape of rapidity dependence of J/? yield
consistent as a function of centrality - No difference observed between CuCu and pp
distributions at 200GeV
51Rapidity Dependence
- Shape of rapidity dependence of J/? yield
consistent as a function of centrality - No difference observed between CuCu and pp
distributions at 200GeV - Rapidity narrowing predicted by recombination
models clearly not present
AuAu
52What have we learned?
- Cold nuclear matter models - do not exhibit J/?
suppression observed in the data - Suppression models
- Comovers
- Instantaneous melting in QGP
- Parton collisions in QGP
- Regeneration models
- Reproduction via D Dbar (HSD)
- Charm quark coalescence
- Statistical hadronization
- While the theoretical models help with the
interpretation of the data, none provide an
unambiguous message
53What have we learned?
- Suppression factor of x3 in central AuAu
- Suppression factor of x2 in central CuCu
- Nuclear modification factor
- Little difference observed between the different
system sizes - Little difference observed between the different
system energies - Little difference observed as a function of
rapidity - The real surprise is the similarities in all of
the distributions gt none of the models account
for this observation
54(No Transcript)
55Transverse Momentum Dependence
fit to extract ltpt2gt
CuCu 200GeV
56Transverse Momentum Dependence
R.L. Thews, PHENIX Muon Workshop, June 13, 2005.
- Data ltpT2gt is consistent with flat as a function
of centrality - Theory Red shows NLO calculation without
recombination - Blue shows effect of including J/? produced via
recombination
57Npart Scaling
- J/? yield scaled by the number of participants is
consistent with flat when plotted versus
centrality
58Collision Probes
- Direct Photons - high energy photons created in
the collision pass unimpeded through the medium - Jets - high energy sprays of back to back
particles - Flow - system expansion
- HBT - source size and lifetime
- Quarkonia Production - hard scattering processes
result in the production of heavy quark pairs
that interact with the collision medium during
hadronization