Probing the Medium at RHIC via J Production - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

Probing the Medium at RHIC via J Production

Description:

In medium interactions convey information about the fundamental properties of the medium itself ... Like sign subtraction method used to isolate J/ signal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: alic109
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Probing the Medium at RHIC via J Production


1
Probing the Medium at RHIC via J/? Production
  • Abigail Bickley
  • University of Colorado
  • November 10, 2005

2
Phase Diagrams of Matter
3
Cosmology
4
Quantum Chromodynamics
Confinement
Asymptotic Freedom
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
  • QCD potential between color carriers increases
    with distance
  • Energy required to separate quark pair greater
    than the rest mass of the pair
  • QCD potential weak at small distances
  • Quarks behave as if they are unbound

5
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
6
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
7
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
8
The Ring
  • 5x1026 cm-2s-1 store averaged luminosity
  • 109 ions per bunch
  • 45 bunches per fill
  • 15 kHz collision rate
  • 2 kHz PHENIX daq rate

9
The Data
Run Species s1/2 GeV NTot
Data Size 01 AuAu 130 10M
3 TB 02 AuAu 200
170M 10 TB pp
200 3.7G 20 TB 03 dAu
200 5.5G 46 TB
pp 200 6.6G 35 TB
04 AuAu 200 1.5G 270 TB
AuAu 62 58M
10 TB 05 CuCu 200 8.6G
173 TB CuCu 62
0.4G 48 TB CuCu
22.5 9M 1 TB pp
200 85B 262 TB
10
Collision Evolution
1 fm/c 3x10-24 seconds
11
Collision Evolution
1 fm/c 3x10-24 seconds
12
Collision Evolution
Quarks and gluons combine to form particles, but
inelastic collisions continue.
1 fm/c 3x10-24 seconds
13
Collision Evolution
Inelastic collisions cease Final particle
yields fixed.
1 fm/c 3x10-24 seconds
14
Collision Evolution
Elastic collisions cease Particles travel to
detector.
1 fm/c 3x10-24 seconds
15
Global Properties of the Collision System
PHOBOS
  • Multiplicity
  • How many particles are generated?
  • Pseudorapidity
  • ? -ln tan(?/2)

16
Collision Centrality
  • Physically characterized by impact parameter
  • BUT
  • Not experimentally observable

17
Collision Centrality
participant
spectator
  • Npart the number of participating nucleons
    (2-392, Au)
  • OR
  • Ncoll the number of binary collisions (1-1200,
    Au)

18
J/?s in the Medium
  • Quarkonia Production -
  • hard scattering processes result in the
  • production of heavy quark pairs that interact
  • with the collision medium during hadronization
  • In medium interactions convey information about
    the fundamental properties of the medium itself
  • Competing effects are predicted to govern J/?
    production
  • J/? color screening
  • Suppression of J/? yield with increasing
    collision centrality
  • J/? recombination
  • Increased J/? yield with increasing collision
    centrality
  • Narrowed J/? rapidity and pT distributions with
    increasing centrality
  • Shadowing, Heavy quark energy loss, Normal
    nuclear absorption, etc

19
Early Predictions Matsui Satz
  • J/? Suppression by Quark-Gluon Plasma Formation,
    PLB 178, 461 (1986).
  • It is concluded that J/ ? suppression in nuclear
    collisions should provide an unambiguous
    signature of quark-gluon plasma formation.
  • Color screening
  • Color charge of one quark masked by the
    surrounding quarks
  • Prevents cc-bar binding in the interaction region
  • Characterized by Debye screening radius (rD)
  • If the screening radius is smaller than the J/ ?
    radius then the quarks are effectively masked
    from one another

rD
20
Early Predictions Matsui Satz
  • Both the screening and J/? radii are temperature
    dependent
  • J/? radius (rJ/?)
  • T0
  • Radius dominated by confining potential
  • 0.2 rJ/? 0.5 fm
  • TTc
  • Include color screened coulombic potential
  • 0.5 rJ/? 1.3 fm
  • Screening radius (rD)
  • Calculated from lattice QCD
  • Tc fixed at 200 MeV
  • rD 0.2 fm

21
Recombination
  • J/? Suppression Models
  • assume heavy quarkonia are formed only during the
    initial hard nucleon-nucleon collisions
  • Subsequent interactions only result in additional
    loss of yield
  • Recombination Models
  • In central heavy ion collisions more than one
    c-cbar pair is formed
  • Regeneration of J/? pairs possible from
    independently produced c and cbars
  • Leads to an enhancement of J/? yield (or less
    dramatic suppression)

22
  • Charm Anticharm Quark Production

23
  • Charm Anticharm Quark Production
  • J/? Formation Models

24
  • J/? Decay Channels

J/? ? hadrons 87.7
25
  • J/? Decay Channels

J/? ? hadrons 87.7
26
The PHENIX Experiment
27
PHENIX Detector Muon Arms
  • J/? ? ? ?-
  • Reconstruct dimuon candidates at forward
    rapidities
  • Coverage p gt 2GeV/c, 1.2 lt y lt 2.2, ???????

28
PHENIX Detector Central Arm
  • J/? ? e e-
  • Reconstruct dielectron candidates at mid-rapidity
  • Coverage p gt 0.2GeV/c, ? lt 0.35, ??????

29
Lots of J/?s!
30
Invariant Mass Plots
PHENIX
PHENIX
Raw J/? signal visible above the combinatorial
and physical background of like sign dimuon and
dielectron pairs
31
Invariant Mass Plots
PHENIX
PHENIX
Raw J/? signal visible above the combinatorial
and physical background of like sign dimuon and
dielectron pairs
32
Invariant Mass Plots
PHENIX
PHENIX
Like sign subtraction method used to isolate J/?
signal Integrate over mass range of 2.6-3.6
GeV/c2
33
Acceptance Efficiency
PHENIX
  • Detector geometrical coverage
  • Detector hardware performance
  • Trigger efficiency
  • Reconstruction efficiency

34
J/? Invariant Yield
35
Comparing Systems and Energies
  • PHENIX data
  • AuAu 200GeV
  • CuCu 200GeV
  • CuCu 62GeV
  • pp 200GeV
  • dAu 200GeV
  • Nuclear Modification Factor (RAA)
  • Scale measured invariant yield by invariant yield
    found in pp collisions at the same energy
  • Account for differing number of nucleons by
    scaling by the number of binary collisions

36
CuCu AuAu Data
37
Nuclear Modification Factor
System size comparison at forward rapidity
38
Nuclear Modification Factor
System size comparison at mid rapidity
39
Nuclear Modification Factor
Rapidity comparison in AuAu 200 GeV
40
Nuclear Modification Factor
Rapidity comparison in CuCu 200 GeV
41
Nuclear Modification Factor
Energy comparison in CuCu 200 62 GeV
42
CuCu Theory
43
What do the theorists predict??
Theory Curves R. Vogt nucl-th/0507027
44
What do the theorists predict??
Theory Curves R. Vogt nucl-th/0507027, A.
Capella hep-ph/0505032
45
What do the theorists predict??
Theory Curves R. Vogt nucl-th/0507027, A.
Capella hep-ph/0505032
46
AuAu Theory
47
What do the theorists predict??
Cold nuclear matter models
48
What do the theorists predict??
Suppression models w/o regeneration
49
What do the theorists predict??
Suppression models with regeneration
50
Rapidity Dependence
  • Shape of rapidity dependence of J/? yield
    consistent as a function of centrality
  • No difference observed between CuCu and pp
    distributions at 200GeV

51
Rapidity Dependence
  • Shape of rapidity dependence of J/? yield
    consistent as a function of centrality
  • No difference observed between CuCu and pp
    distributions at 200GeV
  • Rapidity narrowing predicted by recombination
    models clearly not present

AuAu
52
What have we learned?
  • Cold nuclear matter models - do not exhibit J/?
    suppression observed in the data
  • Suppression models
  • Comovers
  • Instantaneous melting in QGP
  • Parton collisions in QGP
  • Regeneration models
  • Reproduction via D Dbar (HSD)
  • Charm quark coalescence
  • Statistical hadronization
  • While the theoretical models help with the
    interpretation of the data, none provide an
    unambiguous message

53
What have we learned?
  • Suppression factor of x3 in central AuAu
  • Suppression factor of x2 in central CuCu
  • Nuclear modification factor
  • Little difference observed between the different
    system sizes
  • Little difference observed between the different
    system energies
  • Little difference observed as a function of
    rapidity
  • The real surprise is the similarities in all of
    the distributions gt none of the models account
    for this observation

54
(No Transcript)
55
Transverse Momentum Dependence
fit to extract ltpt2gt
CuCu 200GeV
56
Transverse Momentum Dependence
R.L. Thews, PHENIX Muon Workshop, June 13, 2005.
  • Data ltpT2gt is consistent with flat as a function
    of centrality
  • Theory Red shows NLO calculation without
    recombination
  • Blue shows effect of including J/? produced via
    recombination

57
Npart Scaling
  • J/? yield scaled by the number of participants is
    consistent with flat when plotted versus
    centrality

58
Collision Probes
  • Direct Photons - high energy photons created in
    the collision pass unimpeded through the medium
  • Jets - high energy sprays of back to back
    particles
  • Flow - system expansion
  • HBT - source size and lifetime
  • Quarkonia Production - hard scattering processes
    result in the production of heavy quark pairs
    that interact with the collision medium during
    hadronization
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com