A Swarming Architecture is Good for Internet Data Transfer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A Swarming Architecture is Good for Internet Data Transfer

Description:

A Swarming Architecture is Good for Internet Data Transfer ? Offensed by ... Therefore, your 'swarm' does not look like a proper pill for curing the headache. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: csNorth
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Swarming Architecture is Good for Internet Data Transfer


1
A Swarming Architecture is Good for Internet Data
Transfer ?
Offensed by Jiazhen Chen Alexander Kiaie
2
Question1 Why we need this?
  • The Goal of your proposal is
  • Use Swarm for Universal Data Transfer
  • It is Better Because?
  • Robust
  • Multipoint-to-point transport layer
  • Can solve the P2P problem
  • A Headache for Network Administrator
  • However, what about the other aspects?
  • Potential Traffic Congestion
  • Cost of numerous connections among peers
  • Therefore, your swarm does not look like a
    proper pill for curing the headache.

3
Lets continue
  • Despite your ambitious goals
  • What is your motivation for this novel design?
  • In other words
  • Why we need lots of swarm to replace the current
    architecture?
  • Possible Key Benefits
  • Post-Popularity
  • What about using Google Search SourceForge (OR)
  • SkyDrive MSN Search
  • If its legal, there is no barrier for storage
    and sharing online.
  • Block availability
  • Why, Why, Why we need to exchange blocks that
    might never trigger our interest ever???

4
Here we go
  • The Comparison over Uswarm and isolated swarms
  • You claimed Uswarm has potential benefit over
    the other
  • But you admit that here not account for the
    selfish behaviour.
  • Maybe they both perform equally bad )
  • You also admit Its over-estimate the
    improvement in reliability since we did not
    precisely model the tracking process.
  • So.. The tracking process is arbitrarily defined
    and simulated?
  • The impact of DHT, Replicated Trackers on tracker
    availability
  • It might be true - experiment
  • BUT, in this proposal,
  • No explanation on how you measure the result
  • Thus, the conclusion is doubtable to us.

5
Its not over yet
  • The incentive Strategies
  • You said the cost is proportional to the number
    of open connections
  • What if when two peers are willing to upload
    blocks but do not have blocks of interest to the
    other?
  • The TCP inefficiencies, traffic shaping might be
    the cause of the low utilization of bandwidth in
    practice, not mainly caused by your focus
    problem.
  • Without a long-term wide-covered test, it is hard
    to estimate whether your proposal can really work
    better than the current architecture.

6
Deployment
  • Massive Replication
  • Knowledge of routing topology
  • Difficulty
  • Peer knowledge
  • Limit free-riding?

7
Other Work
  • DHT
  • Beehive, CoDoNS
  • They work and have great properties

8
Plan of Work
  • 1 Year for analyzing single-swarm behavior?
  • Security and Privacy testing
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com