Mont Blanc - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Mont Blanc

Description:

cuts through the same reality which. are skew to each other. 23. Universe ... object x has an observable attribute v in range R (of soil fertility, foliage ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1092
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: Barry137
Category:
Tags: attribute | blanc | mont

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mont Blanc


1

 
2
 
3
 
4

 
A Simple Partition
5
A partition can be more or less refined
  • A partition can be more or less refined

6
(No Transcript)
7
 
8
Partition
  • A partition is the drawing of a (typically
    complex) fiat boundary over a certain domain

9
Artists Grid
10
Transparency
  • A partition is transparent
  • It leaves the world exactly as it is

11
Extension of Partitions
  • via enlargement of domain
  • (via gluing of partitions)
  • via refinement
  • via Cartesian product

12
Artists Grid
13
Label/Address System
  • A partition typically comes with labels and an
    address system

14
Cerebral Cortex
15
Mouse Chromosome Five
16
Montana
Montana
17
A partition can comprehend the whole of reality
18
Universe
19
Universe
20
It can do this in different ways
21
Periodic Table
22
Perspectivalism
  • Perspectivalism

Different partitions may represent cuts through
the same reality which are skew to each other
23
Universe/Periodic Table
24
Fiat
  • Fiat objects determined by partitions

25
Kansas
26
France
France
27
Bona Fide
  • Bona fide objects

28
California Land Cover
29
Lake Tahoe Land Cover
Form / Matter
30
Fiat vs bona fide
  • The fiat boundaries which constitute a
    partition may or may not correspond to bona fide
    boundaries on the side of the objects in the
    domain of the partition

31
Fiat vs bona fide
  • but since each partition is transparent
    (veridical) its fiat boundaries will correspond
    at least to fiat boundaries on the side of the
    objects in its domain

32
Partitions vs. 0bjects
  • Partitions are artefacts of our cognition
  • (of our theorizing, classifying, mapping
    activity)

33
Albertis Gridc.1450
34
Sets, groupings, mereological fusions,
tesselations belong not to the realm of objects
but to the realm of partitions
35
we have all been looking in the wrong direction
36
Dürer Reverse
37
Intentionality
38
Intentionality
39
Lakoffs Big Error
the road to idealism
40
Lakoffs Big Error
41
Objects and cells
  • objects are located in cells as guests are
    located in hotel rooms
  • LA(x, z)

object x is recognized by partition A
x ? A ?z (LA(x, z)
42
Defining ?
Sets are (at best) special cases of partitions

43
Set as List Partition
  • A set is a list partition (it is, roughly, a
    partition minus labels and address system)

The elements exist within the set without order
or location they can be permuted at will and the
set remains identical
44
Against models
  • transparent partitions
  • vs.
  • models and sets

45
Set Intentionality
46
D Lewis on Sets
  • Set theory rests on one central relation the
    relation between element and singleton.
  • Sets are mereological fusions of their
    singletons (Lewis, Parts of Classes, 1991)
  • But the relation between an element and its
    singleton is, as Lewis notes, enveloped in
    mystery

47
Mystery
  • Lewis
  • ... since all classes are fusions of singletons,
    and nothing over and above the singletons theyre
    made of, our utter ignorance about the nature of
    the singletons amounts to utter ignorance about
    the nature of classes generally.

48
L(x, z)
  • An object can be located in a cell within a
    partition in any number of ways
  • object x exemplifies kind K
  • object x falls under concept C
  • object x possesses property P
  • object x is in location L

49
L(x, z)
L(x, z)
  • object x is a member of population P
  • object x is in ecological niche N
  • object x has an observable attribute v in range
    R (of soil fertility, foliage density, exposure
    to sunlight, etc.)

50
Cells form a partial order
  • z ?A z' cell z is a sub-cell of the cell in
    partition A (compare dog as sub-cell of mammal)

not equivalent to ?x(x ? z ? x ? z' )

51
Empty Set
  • Partition theory has no counterpart of the empty
    set

Periodic Table
52
Union fails 1
  • We do not have
  • z1, z2 ? A ? z1 ? z2 ? A
  •  
  • Consider z1 Germany
  • z2 France
  • A partition of states
  •  

53
Union fails 2
  • We do not have
  • x1, x2? A ? x1 ? x2 ? A
  •  
  • Consider
  • x1 my cat Plato
  • x2 your dog Aristotle
  • A the partition of the mammals
  •  

54
Better than Sets
even in spite of all of these problems
partitions are
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com