Alexkor Limited - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Alexkor Limited

Description:

Technical/Legal advice. Will oppose claim. Internal Auditors. Nabera owes. R826, ... Valuation was based on 2/3. contribution, whereas it. should have been 100%. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: Alex75
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Alexkor Limited


1
Alexkor Limited Parliamentary Portfolio
Committee- DPE 20 October 2004
2
INDEX
  • Location
  • Corporate Structure
  • Financial Review
  • Challenges
  • Mining
  • Litigation
  • Way Forward

3
LOCATION
4
Northern Cape Semi desert with limited
agricultural potential Small seasonal tourist
industry Local economy mineral driven
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
CORPORATE STRUCTURE
8
CORPORATE STRUCTURE
9
FIANCIAL REVIEW
10
Results
  • Compared to FY03
  • Earnings per share up 570 to 71.5 cents
  • Return on shareholders funds of 89
  • Operating expenses well contained up 0.2 to R238
    million
  • US price per carat up 9
  • Diamond production up 0.6 to 79,725 carats
  • US exchange rate down 22
  • Cash and cash equivalent at year end up 6 to
    R71.4 million
  • Profit margin rose from 2.14 to 13,50
  • The current ratio at 14.96
  • Diamond production income decreased from R265.2
    million to R219.79 million.
  • Net asset value per share improved from 27.2 cent
    to 90.36 cents.
  • ABT reduced the operating loss by 98 to R82,276
    from R5.02 million
  • Capex (Replace of property, plant and equipment)
    up 43 to R15.9 million
  • Exploration spend up 497 to R13.5 million
  • Net tangible value up to 358 cents/share from 316
    cents/share

11
NET PROFIT/(LOSS)
12
Diamond prices achieved
13
Net operating expenses(R millions)
14
Available Cash as at 30 June 2004
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
RevenueTotal Revenue R264 million
18
ABM operating profit
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
MINING
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Marine Mining
26
5 Year Carat Plan
27
Revenue/Profit Plan
28
CHALLENGES
29
Major Challenges
  • Massive replacement Capex
  • Extensive exploration on land
  • Land Claims case
  • Litigation
  • Long term liabilities

30
Timeline
  • Timeline
  • 18 Dec 2003, DPE Min, N.C Premier, Dep. Min Land
    Affairs RV community LRC
  • 23 Dec 2003, RV Community submitted proposal to
    Government.
  • 31 March 2004 Government responds to RV
    settlement proposal.
  • LCC 1st 2 nd April 2004
  • New DPE Minister _at_ Alexkor 15/07/2004
  • Main Hearing 2005

31
RV Settlement Proposal
  • 90 of Alexkor Shareholding
  • 10 Transfer to NAMDA
  • Restoration of the rights in the subject land
  • Ownership of subject land
  • The right to minerals in the subject land.
  • Exclusive beneficial use occupation of land.
  • Compensation for minerals extracted
  • Repair of and compensation for environmental
    damage
  • NB Undue burden on the governments LTD resources.

32
Government Settlement Proposals
  • View to attain sustainable settlement of his
    matter.
  • Government seeks to honour and comply with the
    letter and spirit of the Constitutional Court
    Decision.
  • End-State Indicated Shareholding
  • Government 20
  • RV 65 (51 allocated to cap injection
    through SEP)
  • Employees 5
  • GNC/NAMDA 10

  • 100

33
Richtersveld Community
100
ESOPS
NAMDA/ GNC
RC Company (Land and Mineral Rights Ownership)
Government
5
10
65
20
Alexkor Company Retains management
skills Retains mining (land and marine) activities
34
Rationale
  • Controlling interest to an SEP
  • Mitigate against over reliance on Government fund
  • Viability of Mining Activities needs a capital
    injection of R500 million
  • SEP Infuse technical strategic expertise to
    the company
  • Government
  • Oversight Role S T
  • Exit Strategy L T
  • Implementation Spec Period
  • Alexkor to invest in other sustainable economic
    development models
  • Government cannot provide seed funding
  • Participation by RV _at_ BOD level in carving the
    final end state of Alexkor Ltd

35
Capital additions vs disposals
36
Exploration costs (R millions)
37
LITIGATION
38
NABERA / ALEXKOR
MANAGEMENT FEE AND CHARGEABLE COSTS
REMUNERATION FOR VALUE ADDED
Nabera claimed R3.1 million
Alexkor put R6.1 Million in trust
Snowden jointly appointed
¹/? of R357 million
Internal Auditors
Nabera owes R826,603
R119 million
Misapplication/Inconsistent application of
agreed Valuation Methodology
Mediation
Parties are prepared to talk
Technical/Legal advice
Will oppose claim
39
WAY FORWARD
40
Long term liabilities
  • Provision for post medical retirement aid
    decreased by R5 million. Total liability is R86.5
    million.

41
Long term liabilities (continued)
  • EMPR, Vol3,CSIR,1994 R17.58 million
  • _at_ June 30, 2004 escalated R32.93 million
  • _at_ June 30, 2004 Rehabilitation Trust Fund R8.8
    million
  • _at_ October 2003, monthly contribution increased
    from R100 000 to R230 000
  • Prescribed formula in the Aide-Memoire of DME
    (R201,518)
  • Reg 5.16.3 of Mineral Act 50 of 1991
  • SPC determining the quantum
  • Completion towards end of first semester FY05
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com