CCDs for DECam - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

CCDs for DECam

Description:

Lick Guider (2x) (1 with 2-stage amp) SNAP 9 mm. Pixel spectrograph. CCD 2226 x 868 ... Packaging going on at Lick, Yale Arizona. 6/25/09 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: home7
Learn more at: https://home.fnal.gov
Category:
Tags: ccds | decam | lick

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CCDs for DECam


1
CCDs for DECam
Baseline SNAP CCDs from LBNL (E2V or others are
not excluded) higher QE at near-IR nearly ready
(submit pre-production) potentially lower cost
(processing LBNL finishes backside processing
FNAL does packaging End product is a module
CCD sensor Al N board(s) for support/CRIC
On-plane electronics and cable Other
support/thermal to focal plane
2
Near IR Response
3
Recent progress
  • LBNL has received v.1 SNAP wafers
  • Business model continues to look promising
  • In December, concern was the last top metal step.
    Normally Al could not withstand a high
    temperature backside process. DALSA top metal
    processing with Ti N looks promising
  • LBNL did acquire a plasma etcher for top side
    processing with Al
  • CRIC prototype has read out a LBNL CCD
  • LBNL desires an on-site furnace (400K)

4
SNAP 150mm layout
SNAP 18 mm pixel spectrograph CCD
800 x 1980 NOAO MARS (2x, 1 12 mm pixel with
design for high voltage)
470 x 1264 24mm Lick Guider (2x) (1 with 2-stage
amp)
SNAP 35122
Template for 100 mm cut down if necessary
1k x 512 (4x)
2210 x 802 9mm 2-stage amps (4) 20 fps (4x)
SNAP 9 mm Pixel spectrograph CCD 2226 x 868
5
SNAP 18 mm pixel spectrograph CCD
800 x 1980 NOAO MARS (2x, 1 12 mm pixel with
design for high voltage)
470 x 1264 24mm Lick Guider (2x) (1 with 2-stage
amp)
SNAP 35122
1k x 512 (4x)
2210 x 802 9mm 2-stage amps (4) 20 fps (4x)
SNAP 9 mm Pixel spectrograph CCD 2226 x 868
6
Meeting at LBNL
  • Random thoughts of M. Levi, C. Bebek, S. Holland,
    H. von der Lippe, W. Wester, and J. Fast
  • Modification of mask design 1 week effort with
    3 months of verification
  • No specific 2K x 4K submissions
  • Readout 100kps could be increased x2
  • Packaging is a major issue 50K for packaged
    devices seems like a bargain.
  • Schedule is a driver
  • Packaging going on at Lick, Yale Arizona

7
Other new knowledge
  • Slew times closer to 30 sec not 10 sec
  • 100 kps readout of 24582 (4 amplifiers) is 15 sec
    and 200 kps becomes
  • Gaps in focal plane layout are important
  • Need 5 years to ensure 3 exposures
  • Fill factor less important than tiling step
  • Its the economy stupid (and the schedule)
  • We need to be doing things now with no money
  • Baseline SNAP CCDs with 24582 15 mm2
  • Use existing SNAP devices as our prototype
  • Piggyback (and contribute) to packaging RD
  • (2K x 4K not completely excluded)

8
Focal plane layout
  • Still some options that depend mostly on the
    corrector. 70 devices, 74, or 79

420mm FOV
9
Cost and schedules
  • Work towards reading out CCDs at FNAL
  • 50-100K and 1 year is required
  • Buy some SNAP CCDs
  • Pay for some packaging
  • Set-up dewar
  • Set-up test stand
  • Production order 1-1.5M
  • 48 wafers x 4 devices x 50 yield 96 gradeA
  • Includes packaging MS and CRIC chip
  • Testing effort 250K (dewars DAQ)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com