Title: Definitions
1Quality of Measures
- Definitions
- Correlation, Reliability, Validity, Measurement
error - Theories of Reliability
- Types of Reliability
- Standard Error of Measurement
- Types of Validity
- Article
- Exercise
2Definitions
- Correlation
- reflect direction (/-) strength (0 to 1) of
the relation between two variables - Variance explained
- Reflects the strength of relation of two
variables - Square of correlation
- Varies from 0 to 1
3Vince Carter
Tom Cruise
Julia Roberts
Calista Flockhart
4 r .76 r2 58
Vince Carter
Tom Cruise
Julia Roberts
Calista Flockhart
5Effect of Measurement Error on Correlations
6 r 1.00 r2 100
7 r .98 r2 96
8 r .92 r2 85
9Definitions
- Reliability
- Consistency stability of measurement
- Reliability is necessary but not sufficient for
validity - E.g. A measuring tape to is not a valid way to
measure weight although the tape reliably
measures height and height correlates w/weight - Validity
- Accuracy/meaning of measurement
- Example unstructured vs. structured job
interviews
10Theories of Reliability
- Classical Test Theory explains random variation
in a persons scores on a measure - Effects of learning, mood, changes in
understanding etc. - Test scoretrue score error
- Errors have zero mean
- Errors are uncorrelated with each other
- Errors are uncorrelated with true score
- Constant error is part of true score
11Types of Reliability
- Test-retest
- Consistency across time
- Parallel forms
- Consistency across versions
- Internal
- Consistency across items
- Scorer (inter-rater)
- Consistency across raters/judges
12Example The Satisfaction with Life Scale
(SWLS) 1. In most ways my life is close to
ideal. 2. The conditions of my life are
excellent.3. I am satisfied with my life.4. So
far I have gotten the important things I want in
my life.5. If I could live my life over, I
would change almost nothing. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Strong
ly StronglyDisagree Agree
13Types of Reliability
- Test-retest reliability
- Correlation of scores on the same measure taken
at two different times - Time interval assumes no memory/learning effects
- Parallel-forms
- Correlation of scores on similar versions of the
measure - Forms equivalent on mean, stan dev,
inter-correlations - Can have time interval b/w admin of two forms
14Types of Reliability
Pparticipant
Iitem
15 r .73 r2 50
16- Test-retest reliability of SWLS
- Good test-retest reliability
- Participants have similar scores at Time 1
(beginning of semester) and at Time 2 (end of
semester). - Retest reliability is useful for constructs
assumed to be stable - Current mood (e.g., how you feel right now) shows
low-retest correlations, but that does not mean
that the mood measure is not reliable
17Types of Reliability
- Internal Consistency
- Correlation of scores on two halves of the
measure - Length of measure increases reliability
- Inter-rater
- Correlation of raters scores
- E.g., Scores on structured job interview
- Can also include time interval
- e.g., ratings of the worth of jobs across time
across judges
18Types of Reliability
19 r .70 r2 49
20- Internal consistency of SWLS
- Satisfactory internal consistency.
- Participants respond similarly to items that are
supposed to measure the same variable. - Should be .70 or higher
- Measurement error accounts for half of the
variance in SWLS scores.
21Types of Reliability
- Test-retest
- Parallel forms
- Internal
- Scorer (inter-rater)
22Standard Error of Measurement
- SD of scores when a measure is completed several
times by the same individual - Mostly used in selection contexts
- Decide which of two individuals are hired
- Decide whether a test score is significantly
higher/lower than a cutoff score
23Correction for Attenuation
- Real correlation between two variables after
removing unreliability of each measure - Divide observed correlation by product of the
square roots of individual reliabilities - Note Selection research only controls for
unreliability in criterion bec. we are more
interested in the value of the predictor given a
perfectly reliable criterion
24Quality of Measures
- Definitions
- Correlation, Reliability, Validity, Measurement
error - Theories of Reliability
- Types of Reliability
- Standard Error of Measurement
- Types of Validity
25- Validity
- Evidence that a measure assesses the construct
- Reasons for Invalid Measures
- Different understanding of items
- Different use of the scale (Response Styles)
- Intentionally presenting false information
(socially desirable responding, other-deception) - Unintentionally presenting false information
(self-deception)
26Types of Validity
Construct Validity
Criterion Validity
Content Validity
Predictive Validity
Concurrent Validity
Convergent Validity
Discriminant Validity
Adapted from Sekaran, 2004
27Types of Validity
- Content Validity
- Extent to which items on the measure are a good
representation of the construct - e.g., Is your job interview based on what is
required for the job? - Content validity ratio based on judges
assessments of a measures content - e.g., Expert (supervisors, incumbents) rating of
job relevance of interview questions
28Types of Validity
- Criterion-related Validity
- Extent to which a new measure relates to another
known measure - Validity coefficient Size of relation between
the new measure (predictor) and the known measure
(criterion) (a.k.a correlation) - e.g., do scores on your job interview predict
performance evaluation scores?
29Types of Criterion Validity
- Concurrent
- Scores on predictor and criterion are collected
simultaneously (e.g., police officer study) - Distinguishes between participants in sample who
are already known to be different from each other - Weaknesses
- Range restriction
- Does not include those who were not hired, fired
promoted - Differences in test-taking motivation (employees
vs. applicants) - Experience with job can affect scores on criterion
30Types of Criterion Validity
- Predictive
- Scores on predictor (e.g., selection test)
collected some time before scores on criterion
(e.g., job performance) - Able to differentiate individuals on a criterion
assessed in the future - Weaknesses
- Due to management pressures, applicants can be
chosen based on scores on predictor (can have
range restriction, but this can be corrected) - Often, special measures of job performance are
developed for validation study
31Correction for range restriction
- When full range of scores on predictor variable
is available - Use unrestricted and restricted standard
deviations of predictor variable the observed
correlations b/w predictor criterion
32Types of Validity (contd)
- Construct Validity
- Extent to which hypotheses about construct are
supported by data - Define construct, generate hypotheses about
constructs relation to other constructs - Develop comprehensive measure of construct
assess its reliability - Examine relationship of measure of construct to
other, similar and dissimilar constructs - Examples height weight Learning Style
Orientation measure networking career outcomes
33Establishing Construct Validity
- Multi-trait multi-method matrix
- Convergent validity coefficient
- Absolute size of correlation between different
measures of the same construct - should be large, significantly diff from zero,
- Discriminant validity coefficient
- Relative size of correlations between the same
construct measured by different methods compared
to - Different constructs measured by different
methods - Different constructs measured by same method
(method bias)
34Corr b/w Objective (O) Self-Reports (SR) of
Height Weight
35Establishing Construct Validity
- Multi-trait multi-method matrix
- Different measures of the same construct should
be more highly correlated than different measures
of different constructs - e.g., Perceived career success promotion vs.
networking vs. promotion/salary - Different measures of different constructs should
have lowest correlations - e.g., Networking vs. promotion/salary
36Learning Style Orientation Measure
- Item Development Study (generate critical
incidents) - N67
- Yes/no responses to statements
- Recall of learning events
- Two types of learning theoretical, practical
- Two types of outcomessuccess, failure
- 2 x 2 events per participant
- 112 items constructed in total
37Learning Style Orientation Measure
- Item Development Study (questionnaire)
- N154
- 112 items, 5 point likert scale (agree/disagree)
- 5 factor solution w/factor analyses
- 54 items
- Content validity sorting by 8 grad students
- Goldberg personality scale
38Learning Style Orientation Measure
- Item Development Study
- Correlations b/w LSO personality
- Only 1 sig correlation b/w 5 factors of LSOM!
- High reliabilities of subscales of LSOM (.81-.91)
- Construct (not really convergent) validity
- r b/w LSOM personality subscales
- .42 to -.26.
39Learning Style Orientation Measure
- Validation Study
- N350 -193
- LSOM, Personality, old LSI, preferences for
instructional assessment methods - Construct validity
- r b/w LSOM subscales old LSI .01 to .31
- r b/w LSOM personality subscales .01 to .55
- Confirmatory factor analysis
- 5-dimensions confirmed
- High reliability
40Learning Style Orientation Measure
- Validation Study
- Incremental validity
- Additional variance explained (LSOM vs LSI)
41In-class Exercise
- Brainstorm constructs to develop measures
- E.g. Dimensions of CIR professor effectiveness,
CIR student effectiveness - Choose two constructs that can be measured
similarly and be defined clearly - Example measures
- Self-report (rating scales)
- Peer/informant reports
- Observation
- Archival measures
- Trace measures etc etc.
42In-class Exercise
- Form two-person groups to
- Generate items of the 2 different measures for
each of the two constructs - Appointed person collects all items for both
measures for both constructs - Compiles distributes measures to class
- Class gathers data on both measures both
constructs - Class enters data into SPSS format
- Compute reliabilities,means, correlations
43Fill in the correlations
C1
C2
M1
M1
M2
M2
44Types of Validity
Construct Validity
Criterion Validity
Content Validity
Predictive Validity
Concurrent Validity
Convergent Validity
Discriminant Validity
Adapted from Sekaran, 2004