Honoraria for Design Build Projects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Honoraria for Design Build Projects

Description:

Royal Architectural Institute of Canada. Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade ... project and on level of detail contained in the Request for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: adm49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Honoraria for Design Build Projects


1
  • Honoraria for Design Build Projects
  • Methodology Assessment Matrix

2
Honoraria
  • Principles for the selection of a Design Builder
  • Development of the Honoraria Matrix
  • How to use the Honoraria Matrix

3
Joint Industry-Government Design-Build Task Force
  • Association of Consulting Engineers of Canada
  • Canadian Construction Association
  • Canadian Design-Build Institute
  • Construction Specifications Canada
  • Royal Architectural Institute of Canada
  • Department of Foreign Affairs and International
    Trade
  • Department of National Defence
  • Public Works and Government Services Canada
  • Defence Construction Canada

4
Joint Industry-Government Design-Build Task Force
  • Principles for the selection of a Design Builder
  • Remuneration
  • 50 of a reasonable fee
  • Based on complexity of the project and on level
    of detail contained in the Request for Proposal

5
Guide for Calculation of Remuneration
  • Remuneration estimate of construction cost x
    scope factor x cost factor

6
Scope Factor
  • Combination of
  • Level of detail in the RFP documents
  • High
  • Medium
  • Low
  • Complexity of the project
  • High
  • Medium
  • Low

7
Scope Factor
8
Cost Factor
9
Example
  • Aquatic Centre with competition pool, wave pool,
    leisure water play area, weight training, and
    exercise room - 32,000,000
  • RFP included building program, functional
    relationships and description of intended image
    and character
  • Best Value Selection 50 quality/50 price
    requiring a comprehensive proposal

10
Example - Scope Factor
11
Example - Cost Factor
12
Example - Remuneration
  • 32,000,000 x 0.006 x 0.872 167,000

13
Remuneration
  • Guide for the Calculation of Remuneration for
    Design-Build Proposals
  • _at_
  • www.cdbi.org

14
Methodology Assessment Matrix
  • Design
  • For what project complexity is the delivery
    method best suited
  • To what extent must user requirements be defined
    prior to tender
  • What level of design quality is
    characteristically achieved with the delivery
    method

15
Methodology Assessment Matrix
  • Design
  • How complex is the design review process for the
    owner
  • To what extent can the delivery method
    accommodate scope/design changes during
    construction phase

16
Methodology Assessment Matrix
  • Design
  • To what extent does the delivery method
    inherently minimize changes
  • To what degree do the owner and user have direct
    contact with the designer and are they able to
    directly influence the design

17
Methodology Assessment Matrix
  • Schedule
  • To what extent can the delivery method achieve
    accelerated delivery, or ensure delivery to
    specific schedule
  • Ability to accommodate early construction start

18
Methodology Assessment Matrix
  • Cost
  • Potential to obtain an early cost commitment
  • To what extent does the method accommodate
    adjustments to scope change during construction
    to achieve final costs within budget
  • To what ability can the delivery method reduce
    claims/costs for changes and delays

19
Methodology Assessment Matrix
  • Cost
  • Ability to meet cash flow
  • To what extent does the method permit the Owner
    to influence systems, materials and construction
    methods to minimize life cycle costs

20
Methodology Assessment Matrix
  • Contracting
  • To what extent is the required design and
    construction experience and knowledge available
    for the method
  • Ability to pre-qualify the prime contractor on
    publicly funded projects
  • Ability to pre-qualify the prime contractor on
    privately funded projects

21
Methodology Assessment Matrix
  • Contracting
  • Ability to pre-qualify subcontractors
  • To what extent does the method employ a simple
    bid evaluation and selection system
  • What level of construction quality can be
    achieved with the applicable delivery method

22
Methodology Assessment Matrix
  • Risk
  • To what extent does the method permit the Owner
    to transfer the liability for design errors and
    omissions, delays, construction errors and
    omissions and non conformance to contract
    documents

23
Methodology Assessment Matrix
  • General
  • To what extent do Owners have the experience and
    knowledge required to employ the method
  • Market readiness
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com