Title: Participating in the 6th EU Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstr
1Participating in the 6th EU Framework Programme
for Research, Technological Developmentand
Demonstration
- Specific aspects of proposals forNetworks of
Excellence (NoE) - B. Asamer, R. König R. SchwertnerBIT - Bureau
for International Research and Technology
Cooperation, AT - An initiative of the Austrian Government and
the Economic Chamber Austria
2Networks of ExcellenceStructuring ERA
Virtual Centres of Excellence
3Networks of Excellence 1Joint Programme of
Activities
- Best people and best places (critical mass)
- Integrating activities
- coordinated programming of partners activities
- sharing of research tools and facilities
- joint managment of knowledge portfolio
- staff mobility and exchanges
- relocation of staff, teams and equipment
- reinforced electronic communication systems
- joint research activities
- development of new research tools and platforms
- generating new knowledge
4Networks of Excellence 2Joint Programme of
Activities
- Activities to spread excellence
- training researchers and key staff
- dissemination
- networking external
- promoting exploitation within network
- protection of knowledge
- socio-economic impact of knowledge
- plan for use and dissemination of knowledge
- take-up activities
5Networks of Excellence 3Joint Programme of
Activities
- Network management
- overall coordination
- communication with commission, reporting
- consortium level financing, accounting and legal
issues - coordination of knowledge management activities
- gender equality
- science and society issues
- supporting governing board and other network
bodies
6General Evaluation Criteria
- scientific and technological excellence and the
degree of innovation - efficient management resources, competencies,
organisational modalities - Relevance to the objectives of the specific
programme - European added value, critical mass of resources
mobilised, contribution to EU policies - quality of plan for using or disseminating
knowledge, potential for promoting innovation,
clear plans for the management of IPR
7Specific Evaluation Criteria for NoE
- 1. Relevance (theshold score 3 out of 5)
- 2. Potential impact (3 out of 5)
- 3. Excellence of participants (3 out of 5)
- 4. Degree of integration and the Joint Programme
of Activities (JPA) (4 out of 5) - 5. Organisation and management (3 out of 5)
8Part A Administrative Forms
- Form A1 General Information on the Proposal
- Form A2 Information on Participants
- Form A3 Financial Information
- per participant
- number of researchers to be integrated (F/M)
- number of registered doctoral students in the
NoE - researcher - at least 4 years of experience
or doctoral degree - employee or under
authority of participant - - constituting the auditable research
capacities of the NoE - at the time of deadline
- registered doctoral students
- - enrolled in doctoral course run by partner
in frame of NoE - - auditable set of names at time of deadline
9Financial Regime for NoE 1
- New Not a cost approach
- EU contribution targeted at stimulating durable
integration, willingness to change - overcoming organisational, cultural, human
barriers - incentive for integration, organisational
change, mutual specialisation - EU contribution as a fixed grant for integration
- calculated on basis of total number of
researchers that make up research capacities of
the partners on the topic of the NoE - precise method of calculation will be described
in Call - annual grant 20 kEUR/researcher
10Financial Regime for NoE 2
- Table for determining theaverage annual amount
for NoE - 50 researchers 1 million/year
- 100 researchers 2 million/year
- 150 researchers 3 million/year
- 250 researchers 4 million/year
- 500 researchers 5 million/year
- 1000 researchers 6 million/year
- An additional amount of 4000 EUR per year (up to
max. 10 of grant for researchers) will be
granted for each registered doctoral student. - At least the value of the grant have to be used
for the implementation of the Joint Programme of
Activities.
6
11Part B (0)
- Front page
- proposal full title
- Proposal acronym
- Date of Preparation
- Type of instrument Network of Excellence
- List of participants with coordinator first
- Coordinator name
- Coordinator organisation name
- Coordinator email
- Coordinator fax
12Part B (1)
- Contents page
- Proposal summary page
- proposal full title
- Proposal acronym
- Strategic objectives addressed
- Proposal abstract
13Part B (2)
- B.1 Objectives of the NoE (3 pages)
- in measurable and verifiable form
- progress of NoEs integration will be measured
- list of names and employing organisations
- B.2 Relevance to the objective of the Priority(3
pages) - relate how the proposed NoEs integration
goaladdresses the objectives of the Thematic
Priority
14Part B (3)
- B.3 Potential impact (5 pages)
- demonstrate the need for strengthening and
reinforcing ST excellence on the topic concerned
by restructuring - plan to achieve restructuring and strengthening
ST - plan for spreading of excellence
- plan for dissemination and exploitation of
knowledge - explain sustainability of structuring impact on
European research beyond EU funding - B.3.1contribution to standards / policies /
regulations(national, international) (1 page)
15Part B (4)
- B.4 Degree of integration and the JPA (25 pages)
- Show how JPA brings about the expected degree of
integration - detailed description of JPA - activities and
their components - show integrating effect toward
NoE(NoE List of activities) - Detailed description of
- B.4.1 Integrating activities and involved
partners performance indicators - B.4.2 Programme for joint research activities
- B.4.3 Activities to spread excellence
particularly training - B.4.4. Management activities organisation and
management plans
16Part B (5)
- B.5 Description of consortium and excellence of
the participants (5 pages) - research that participants are currently doing in
the topical area of NoE or show other
contributions - suitability of roles of partners in JPA
- collective critical mass of expertise and
resources - role of potential future partners (2 pages)
- importance of INCO partners or partners from
countries with ST agreement (1 page) - B.6 Quality of the integration (5 pages)
- integration through the JPA
- commitment of partners towards deep and durable
integration - list of quantitative and qualitative performance
indicators
17Part B (6)
- B.7 Organisation and management (5 pages)
- appropriateness of organisational structure and
decision-making mechanism for complexity of NoE
and integration - contribution of management to achieve NoE goals
- plan for the management of knowledge, IPR, other
innovation related activities - management of integration of new partners
18Part B (7)
- B.8 Joint Programme of Activities (JPA) - first
18 months (15 pages forms) - structure of JPA and contribution to 18m goals
- identify risks and contingency plans
- Work packages break down
- network management, assessment
- JPA introduction structure, overall methodology
- work planning (Gantt chart or similar)
- Graphical presentation of components and
interdependencies (Pert diagram or similar) - Detailed activity description
- Work package list
- Delieverable/milestones list
- description of each work package
- Forms Gantt chart, Pert diagram, WP list,
deliverable/milestone list, description of
each WP
19Part B (8)
- B.9 Other issues (1page)
- how are ethical issues taken into account (if
appropriate) based on nat. internat.
regulations - potential ethical aspects of the implementation
of the NoE results - other issues related to EU policies
- spreading awareness and knowledge beyond NoE
- explore wider societal implications
- synergies with education at all levels
- action plan to assure gender equality in NoE
- B.10 Gender issues (1page)
- Gender Action Plan
- how are gender issues related to the subject of
proposal taken into account
20Thank you for your attention!
Prof. Manfred Horvat Director Tel 43 1
26013-114 (-109) Fax 43 1 26013-16
(-16) horvat_at_bit.ac.at http//www.bit.ac.at