Participating in the 6th EU Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstr - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Participating in the 6th EU Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstr

Description:

quality of plan for using or disseminating knowledge, potential for promoting ... auditable set of names at time of deadline. RUSERA FP6 Trainings May 2004 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: sitc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Participating in the 6th EU Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstr


1
Participating in the 6th EU Framework Programme
for Research, Technological Developmentand
Demonstration
  • Specific aspects of proposals forNetworks of
    Excellence (NoE)
  • B. Asamer, R. König R. SchwertnerBIT - Bureau
    for International Research and Technology
    Cooperation, AT
  • An initiative of the Austrian Government and
    the Economic Chamber Austria

2
Networks of ExcellenceStructuring ERA
Virtual Centres of Excellence
3
Networks of Excellence 1Joint Programme of
Activities
  • Best people and best places (critical mass)
  • Integrating activities
  • coordinated programming of partners activities
  • sharing of research tools and facilities
  • joint managment of knowledge portfolio
  • staff mobility and exchanges
  • relocation of staff, teams and equipment
  • reinforced electronic communication systems
  • joint research activities
  • development of new research tools and platforms
  • generating new knowledge

4
Networks of Excellence 2Joint Programme of
Activities
  • Activities to spread excellence
  • training researchers and key staff
  • dissemination
  • networking external
  • promoting exploitation within network
  • protection of knowledge
  • socio-economic impact of knowledge
  • plan for use and dissemination of knowledge
  • take-up activities

5
Networks of Excellence 3Joint Programme of
Activities
  • Network management
  • overall coordination
  • communication with commission, reporting
  • consortium level financing, accounting and legal
    issues
  • coordination of knowledge management activities
  • gender equality
  • science and society issues
  • supporting governing board and other network
    bodies

6
General Evaluation Criteria
  • scientific and technological excellence and the
    degree of innovation
  • efficient management resources, competencies,
    organisational modalities
  • Relevance to the objectives of the specific
    programme
  • European added value, critical mass of resources
    mobilised, contribution to EU policies
  • quality of plan for using or disseminating
    knowledge, potential for promoting innovation,
    clear plans for the management of IPR

7
Specific Evaluation Criteria for NoE
  • 1. Relevance (theshold score 3 out of 5)
  • 2. Potential impact (3 out of 5)
  • 3. Excellence of participants (3 out of 5)
  • 4. Degree of integration and the Joint Programme
    of Activities (JPA) (4 out of 5)
  • 5. Organisation and management (3 out of 5)

8
Part A Administrative Forms
  • Form A1 General Information on the Proposal
  • Form A2 Information on Participants
  • Form A3 Financial Information
  • per participant
  • number of researchers to be integrated (F/M)
  • number of registered doctoral students in the
    NoE
  • researcher - at least 4 years of experience
    or doctoral degree - employee or under
    authority of participant
  • - constituting the auditable research
    capacities of the NoE
  • at the time of deadline
  • registered doctoral students
  • - enrolled in doctoral course run by partner
    in frame of NoE
  • - auditable set of names at time of deadline

9
Financial Regime for NoE 1
  • New Not a cost approach
  • EU contribution targeted at stimulating durable
    integration, willingness to change
  • overcoming organisational, cultural, human
    barriers
  • incentive for integration, organisational
    change, mutual specialisation
  • EU contribution as a fixed grant for integration
  • calculated on basis of total number of
    researchers that make up research capacities of
    the partners on the topic of the NoE
  • precise method of calculation will be described
    in Call
  • annual grant 20 kEUR/researcher

10
Financial Regime for NoE 2
  • Table for determining theaverage annual amount
    for NoE
  • 50 researchers 1 million/year
  • 100 researchers 2 million/year
  • 150 researchers 3 million/year
  • 250 researchers 4 million/year
  • 500 researchers 5 million/year
  • 1000 researchers 6 million/year
  • An additional amount of 4000 EUR per year (up to
    max. 10 of grant for researchers) will be
    granted for each registered doctoral student.
  • At least the value of the grant have to be used
    for the implementation of the Joint Programme of
    Activities.

6
11
Part B (0)
  • Front page
  • proposal full title
  • Proposal acronym
  • Date of Preparation
  • Type of instrument Network of Excellence
  • List of participants with coordinator first
  • Coordinator name
  • Coordinator organisation name
  • Coordinator email
  • Coordinator fax

12
Part B (1)
  • Contents page
  • Proposal summary page
  • proposal full title
  • Proposal acronym
  • Strategic objectives addressed
  • Proposal abstract

13
Part B (2)
  • B.1 Objectives of the NoE (3 pages)
  • in measurable and verifiable form
  • progress of NoEs integration will be measured
  • list of names and employing organisations
  • B.2 Relevance to the objective of the Priority(3
    pages)
  • relate how the proposed NoEs integration
    goaladdresses the objectives of the Thematic
    Priority

14
Part B (3)
  • B.3 Potential impact (5 pages)
  • demonstrate the need for strengthening and
    reinforcing ST excellence on the topic concerned
    by restructuring
  • plan to achieve restructuring and strengthening
    ST
  • plan for spreading of excellence
  • plan for dissemination and exploitation of
    knowledge
  • explain sustainability of structuring impact on
    European research beyond EU funding
  • B.3.1contribution to standards / policies /
    regulations(national, international) (1 page)

15
Part B (4)
  • B.4 Degree of integration and the JPA (25 pages)
  • Show how JPA brings about the expected degree of
    integration
  • detailed description of JPA - activities and
    their components - show integrating effect toward
    NoE(NoE List of activities)
  • Detailed description of
  • B.4.1 Integrating activities and involved
    partners performance indicators
  • B.4.2 Programme for joint research activities
  • B.4.3 Activities to spread excellence
    particularly training
  • B.4.4. Management activities organisation and
    management plans

16
Part B (5)
  • B.5 Description of consortium and excellence of
    the participants (5 pages)
  • research that participants are currently doing in
    the topical area of NoE or show other
    contributions
  • suitability of roles of partners in JPA
  • collective critical mass of expertise and
    resources
  • role of potential future partners (2 pages)
  • importance of INCO partners or partners from
    countries with ST agreement (1 page)
  • B.6 Quality of the integration (5 pages)
  • integration through the JPA
  • commitment of partners towards deep and durable
    integration
  • list of quantitative and qualitative performance
    indicators

17
Part B (6)
  • B.7 Organisation and management (5 pages)
  • appropriateness of organisational structure and
    decision-making mechanism for complexity of NoE
    and integration
  • contribution of management to achieve NoE goals
  • plan for the management of knowledge, IPR, other
    innovation related activities
  • management of integration of new partners

18
Part B (7)
  • B.8 Joint Programme of Activities (JPA) - first
    18 months (15 pages forms)
  • structure of JPA and contribution to 18m goals
  • identify risks and contingency plans
  • Work packages break down
  • network management, assessment
  • JPA introduction structure, overall methodology
  • work planning (Gantt chart or similar)
  • Graphical presentation of components and
    interdependencies (Pert diagram or similar)
  • Detailed activity description
  • Work package list
  • Delieverable/milestones list
  • description of each work package
  • Forms Gantt chart, Pert diagram, WP list,
    deliverable/milestone list, description of
    each WP

19
Part B (8)
  • B.9 Other issues (1page)
  • how are ethical issues taken into account (if
    appropriate) based on nat. internat.
    regulations
  • potential ethical aspects of the implementation
    of the NoE results
  • other issues related to EU policies
  • spreading awareness and knowledge beyond NoE
  • explore wider societal implications
  • synergies with education at all levels
  • action plan to assure gender equality in NoE
  • B.10 Gender issues (1page)
  • Gender Action Plan
  • how are gender issues related to the subject of
    proposal taken into account

20
Thank you for your attention!
Prof. Manfred Horvat Director Tel 43 1
26013-114 (-109) Fax 43 1 26013-16
(-16) horvat_at_bit.ac.at http//www.bit.ac.at
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com