The Impact of Student Learning Through Wisconsin School Library Media Centers PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Impact of Student Learning Through Wisconsin School Library Media Centers


1
The Impact of Student Learning Through Wisconsin
School Library Media Centers
  • IMTT Regional Meetings
  • Kate Bugher, Educational Consultant
  • Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
  • October 2006

2
Study Objectives
  • Examine the leadership and instructional role of
    library media specialists in a robust information
    and technology literacy program
  • Measure their impact on and contribution to
    student achievement

3
Study Methodology
  • Three sections or mini-studies
  • Survey of library media specialists
  • Quantitative data library media program
    structure, resources, and operations
  • Survey of students and teachers
  • Qualitative data how students benefit from
    library media programs
  • Case Studies of best practice programs
  • 5 schools representative of grade levels,
    geographic location and demographics

4
Data Collection
  • Online surveys of teachers, students, library
    media specialists (May June 2005)
  • Responses from 107 teachers and 3,957 students in
    51 randomly selected schools
  • Obtained data on 1,043 school library media
    centers from 855 Library Media Specialists
  • Extracted WINSS school and student data for
    responding school libraries for statistical and
    correlational analysis (November 2005)

5
Library Media Program FindingsStaffing
  • significant gaps between recommended staffing
    levels defined by the School Information and
    Technology Staffing Guidelines in and actual
    staffing levels. (page 2)
  • 2005-06 LMS Staffing Data
  • 1153.8 FTE Library Media Specialists
  • 200 districts with only 1 LMS (47)
  • 32 districts with less than 1 FTE LMS (DPI PI1202
    fall staff submission)

6
DPI Staffing Guidelines (Information
Technology Literacy A Collaborative Planning
Guide for Library Media and Technology, p. 23)
7
Library Media Program FindingsStaffing
8
Library Media Program Findings Staff Activities
per Week
9
Library Media Program Findings Hours
  • LMS hours per week increase by grade level from
  • 27.7 (E) to 35.5 (H)
  • Hours of aide per week also increase by grade
    level from 28.4 (E) to 37.7 (H)
  • Libraries are open for 38 hours (E), 41 hours
    (M),
  • 44 hours a week (H)
  • On average, libraries are open for 2 hours a week
    before school and 2 (E) to 3.7 hours (H) after
    school

10
Library Media Program Findings Resources
  • Technology has permeated library media centers
  • 58-67 have laptops
  • 70 have scanners
  • 80 have data projectors and digital cameras
  • An average library media center has
  • 26 (E) to 35 (H) computers
  • 10-15 laptops
  • 1 scanner
  • 3-4 printers
  • 2-3 LCDs
  • 3 digital cameras

11
Library Media Program FindingsResources
  • Tremendous access to online databases
  • 85 of classrooms
  • 70-80 of all school computers and
  • 60-74 from home computers
  • About 80 of Library Media Centers have some form
    of OPAC
  • 60-64 can access it from all school computers

12
Teacher Student Surveys
  • Teachers and student surveys examined library
    media program helpfulness in seven areas
  • Getting information students need
  • Using information to complete school work
  • School work in general (knowledge acquisition)
  • Using technology
  • General reading interests
  • Interests and activities outside of school
    (Independent Skills)
  • Academic Achievement
  • (Five-point scale 1-very helpful, 2-helpful,
    3-somewhat helpful, 4-of little help, 5-not at
    all helpful)

13
FindingsTeacher Student Surveys
  • Teachers overall considered the library media
    center
  • helpful in ALL 7 areas (using mean scores)
  • most helpful as a source for
  • Getting Information
  • Using Technology
  • Reading
  • Using Information

14
FindingsTeacher Student Surveys
  • Rural teachers, compared to suburban and urban,
    found school library media programs more helpful
    for
  • Getting Information
  • Knowledge Acquisition
  • Using Technology
  • Independent Skills
  • Academic Achievement
  • Urban teachers, compared to suburban and rural,
    found school library media programs more helpful
    for
  • Reading
  • Using Information

15
FindingsTeacher Student Surveys
  • Teachers, overall, who aligned the WMAS for
    Information and Technology Literacy to their
    lessons considered the school library media
    program MORE HELPFUL in all seven areas than
    teachers who did not implement such an alignment.
    (Page 2)

16
FindingsTeacher Student Surveys
  • Students most helpful areas
  • Using Technology
  • Getting Information
  • Using Information
  • Elementary students considered the library media
    program more helpful than secondary students in
    all areas

17
KEY FindingsLibrary Media Program Study
  • Higher WKCE performance across all educational
    levels
  • in schools with higher levels of library media
    program staffing
  • where the Library Media Specialist spent more
    time on instructionally-related student and
    teacher activities
  • Schools with greater library resources
    (collection, technology, )

18
KEY FindingsLibrary Media Program Study
  • WKCE performance was higher in programs
  • with full-time Library Media Specialist than
    part-time or no Library Media Specialist
  • full-time aides than part-time or no aides
  • Socio-economic and school variables had the
    greatest impact on student performance
  • Library variables explained 3 (E), 9 (M),
    8-19 (H) of WCKE performance

19
Factors Impacting Student Achievement
  • Staffing
  • Resources
  • School variables (ethnic, poverty,
    student-teacher ratio)
  • LMC Use
  • Collaboration
  • Hours
  • Teacher experience
  • Collection age
  • Technology
  • Online access
  • Information skills instruction
  • Leadership
  • Volunteers

20
Factors, cont.
  • Factors explained variance in library program
    school data
  • Elementary 9 factors explained 65 variance
  • Middle School 10 factors explained 67
    variance
  • High School 8 factors explained 73 variance

21
Factors Impacting WKCE Performance
  • Elementary WKCE Reading 26
  • School variables
  • Teacher experience
  • Resources 3.4
  • LMC staffing leadership
  • Elementary WKCE Language Arts 25
  • School variables
  • Resources
  • Hours 3.2
  • Teacher experience

22
Factors Impacting WKCE Performance
  • Middle School WKCE Reading 22.4
  • School
  • Resources 9.2
  • LMC staffing instructional activities
  • High School WKCE Reading 18.6
  • Resources 7.9
  • School (poverty teacher-student ratio)
  • School (ethnic)
  • WKCE Language Arts 31
  • Resources 19
  • School (poverty teacher-student ratio)
  • School (ethnic)

23
KEY FindingsOverall Conclusions
  • Role of Library Media Specialist focuses on three
    distinct areas as educators and students see the
    Library Media Specialist as
  • A teacher librarian
  • An agent of change
  • An technology integrator

24
KEY FindingsOverall Conclusions
  • Library media specialists
  • contribute directly to quality instructional
    programs and to quality teaching
  • help students acquire unique skills not taught
    in classroom
  • Library media program provides information skills
    and technology literacy essential for
    students/learners in 21st Century in and outside
    of school

25
KEY FindingsOverall Conclusions
  • Library Media Center is a central and vital
    component of schools instructional program
  • The heart of a school
  • Library media program staff (LMS and aides) are
    the most critical program component
  • Programs having less impact on student
    performance have
  • low staffing levels
  • fewer resources (collection, technology, )

26
Areas for Further Examination
  • Staffing guidelines and levels, both for Library
    Media Specialist and aides
  • Amount of time Library Media Specialists spend on
    instructional-related activities
  • Collecting reliable and consistent School Library
    Media program data

27
Researcher Information
  • Esther G. Smith, Ph.D.
  • EGS Research Consulting
  • 6106 Ledge Mountain
  • Austin, Texas 78731
  • egs_at_io.com
  • Voice 512-467-8807
  • Fax 512-467-8801

28
Contact Information
  • Kate Bugher
  • Education Consultant
  • Wisconsin DPI
  • Instructional Media Technology
  • 125 South Webster Street - PO Box 7841
  • Madison, WI 53707-7841
  • kathryn.bugher_at_dpi.state.wi.us
  • Voice 608-267-9287
  • Fax 608-267-1052
  • http//dpi.wi.gov/imt/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com