The Physics of Mass Loss From Stars - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

The Physics of Mass Loss From Stars

Description:

The Physics of Mass Loss From Stars – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: KPan8
Category:
Tags: aa | cup | loss | mass | physics | stars

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Physics of Mass Loss From Stars


1
The Physics of Mass Loss From Stars
  • Jon E. Bjorkman
  • Ritter Observatory

2
Fluid Equations
  • Continuity
  • Momentum
  • Energy (Dominated by Heating/Cooling)
  • Equation of State

3
Wind Mechanisms
  • Pressure-Driven
  • Coronal Winds
  • Wave-Driven
  • Accoustic Waves
  • Alfven Waves
  • Rotationally-Driven
  • Centrifugal
  • Magneto-centrifugal
  • Radiation-Driven
  • Dust
  • Continuum Opacity
  • Spectral Lines

4
Stellar Mass Loss
  • Hydrostatic (Isothermal) Atmosphere
  • Outer Boundary Condition
  • (almost) Zero Pressure
  • Impossible to build Static Star

5
Isothermal Winds
  • Wind Equation
  • Combined momentum and continuity equations
  • Critical Point

Pushing on flow moves rc inward
6
X-Type Solution Topology
Bondi 1952
7
Boundary Conditions
  • Two point boundary value problem
  • Stellar Surface
  • ISM
  • Mass Loss Rate

8
Stellar Outflow
Decreasing PISM
Increasing
9
Stellar Outflow
  • As PISM decreases
  • flow initially subsonic
  • v0 increases gt mass loss increases
  • outer boundary determines mass loss rate
  • Until solution passes through critical point
  • v0 now constant gt mass loss constant
  • flow is choked
  • termination shock matches PISM
  • outer boundary determines shock location
  • Conclude
  • Mass loss determined by critical point location

10
Effect of External Forces
  • Supersonic Momentum Deposition
  • Increases terminal speed
  • Mass loss unchanged
  • Subsonic Momentum Deposition
  • Moves critical point inward
  • Increases mass loss
  • May indirectly affect terminal speed

11
Continuum-Driven Winds
  • Radiative Acceleration
  • Wind Equation
  • AGB Stars
  • Dust condenses in outflow

12
Line-Driven Winds
  • Sobolev Optical Depth
  • Line acceleration
  • Optically thin lines
  • Optically thick lines

13
Line-Driven Winds
  • Line Acceleration
  • CAK parameterization

14
Line Force
Abbott 1980
Abbott 1982
15
Line-Driven Winds
  • Wind Equation

16
Line-Driven Winds
  • Wind Acceleration
  • Subsonic
  • 1 positive soln
  • Sonic
  • 1 positive soln
  • Supersonic
  • 2 positive solns
  • Critical
  • 1 positive soln
  • Plus one more negative solution

17
Line-Driven Winds
Abbott 1980
18
CAK Critical Point Topology
  • Quasi-Linearization
  • Courant and Hilbert 1962
  • Differentiate wind equation (so that it is linear
    in the derivatives)
  • Wind Equation

19
CAK Critical Point Topology
  • CAK critical point is X-type

Bjorkman 95
(D0)
20
Line-Driven Winds
  • Mass Loss Rate
  • At critical point
  • flow speed speed of inward radiative-acoustic
    wave (Abbott 1980)
  • Radiative force balances gravity (inertia)
  • given yc, mass loss (r) is raised/lowered until
    there are the correct number of thin lines
    (Gayley 1995)

21
Line-Driven Winds
  • Terminal Speed
  • (formerly) optically thick lines gt G gt 1
  • Provide acceleration in supersonic region
  • Relative number of thick lines sets terminal
    speed
  • Changes in line force (ionization shifts, d, etc)
    alter terminal speed

22
Temperature Dependence
  • Dominant Driving Ions
  • O Stars
  • CNO
  • B Stars
  • Fe group

Abbott 1982
23
Bi-stable Winds
  • Ionization shifts alter driving lines
  • Mass increases discontinuously
  • Terminal speed drops
  • Caused by change of Fe III ionization (Vink, de
    Koter, Lamers 1999)

Pauldrach Puls 1990 Lamers Pauldrach 1991
24
Bi-Stable Winds
  • Observed Terminal Speeds

Crowther, Lennon, Walborn 06 see also Evans et
al. 04, and Trundle et al. 04
Lamers, Snow, Lindholm 95 Kudritzki Puls 00
25
Weak Line-Driven Winds
  • Breakdown of CAK parameterization
  • Wind requires at least one optically thick line
  • Abbott 1979
  • Babel 1996

Abbott 1979
26
Weak Line-Driven Winds
  • Gas not well coupled to driving ions
  • Ion runaway heating
  • Springmann Pauldrach 1992
  • Gayley Owocki 1994
  • Multicomponent Winds
  • Babel 1995
  • Krticka Kubat 2000, 2001
  • Detailed multicomponent NLTE Model
  • Krticka Kubat 2004
  • Wind terminal speed is lowered
  • removes discrepancies with observations

27
Metallicity Dependence
  • Wind driven by metals
  • Lower mass loss at low Z
  • Vink et al. 2001
  • See also Abbott 1982 Puls et al. 2000 Kudritzki
    2002
  • Lower terminal speed
  • Garmany Conti 85 Prinja 87 Leitherer et al.
    92

28
High Mass Loss
  • Wind Momentum
  • Single Scattering Limit
  • Wind momentum problem (Barlow et al. 1981)
  • Photon Tiring Limit
  • Owocki Gayley 1997

29
Multiple Scattering
Abbott Lucy 1985
30
Multiple Scattering
  • Theoretical performance factor
  • Gayley, Owocki, Cranmer 1995
  • Momentum problem is really an opacity problem
  • must fill entire spectral region with lines
  • Requires ionization stratification
  • Lucy Abbott 93, Springmann 94,
  • Yes, but ionization is tricky
  • Schmutz 91, 94, 97 Shaerer and Schmutz 94

31
Line Driven Winds withMultiple Scattering
  • Monte Carlo RT Simulation
  • Kurucz line list (106 lines)
  • Sample photon scatterings
  • Measure line acceleration
  • Measure energy transfer from photons to wind
  • Lucy Abbott (1993) method
  • Assume velocity law
  • Use energy conservation to find mass loss rate

32
Line Driven Winds withMultiple Scattering
  • Schaerer Schmutz 1994 Kudritzki 2002
  • Use depth-dependent k a
  • solve wind dynamics, including critical point
  • Mihaylov Bjorkman (2004)
  • sample MC line forces in each cell
  • Gives (Cf)i and ai
  • Solve for yi and integrate wind velocity
  • Map solution topology

33
Multiple Scattering
Mihaylov 04
34
Ionization Effects
Mihaylov 04
35
Continuum Driven Winds
  • Basic Requirement
  • Nugis Lamers (2002)
  • used Fe-bump (OPAL opacities)
  • At sonic point
  • Opacity must increase outward
  • Eddington factor G 1

36
OPAL Opacities
  • Sonic Point

Nugis Lamers 02
37
NLTE rad-hydro WR Wind
Gfäfener Hamann 2005
38
NLTE rad-hydro WR Wind
Gfäfener Hamann 2005
39
Instabilities, Clumps Porosity
Shaviv 01
Shaviv 00
40
Acknowledments
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com