Inferring the source of pathogens in contaminated streams during flood events PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 17
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Inferring the source of pathogens in contaminated streams during flood events


1
Inferring the source of pathogens in contaminated
streams(during flood events)
  • Graham McBride

2
Current conceptual diagram
Campylobacter Ecology Reservoirs, Amplifiers and
Transmission Routes

carcass preparation
slaughter house
X
-
contamin
food processing
food industry
Veg/Fruit/Cereal
Food
food distribution
Safety
animal contact
retail
Agriculture
Animal Conservation
food preparation
home/cater/service
Primary Producer
consumption
consumption
Human
Animal
drinking
-
water
Systems
excreta
excreta
excreta
food
recreation
drinking
sewage treatment
sewage treatment
aquatic environments
drinking
-
water
drinking
-
water
Reservoirs Amplifiers
Environmental
treatment
treatment
Transmission Routes
Health
Direction of Transmission
drinking
-
water
3
Current conceptual diagram
Campylobacter Ecology Reservoirs, Amplifiers and
Transmission Routes

carcass preparation
slaughter house
X
-
contamin
food processing
food industry
Veg/Fruit/Cereal
Food
food distribution
Safety
animal contact
retail
Agriculture
Animal Conservation
food preparation
home/cater/service
Primary Producer
consumption
consumption
Human
Animal
drinking
-
water
Systems
excreta
excreta
excreta
food
recreation
drinking
sewage treatment
sewage treatment
aquatic environments
drinking
-
water
drinking
-
water
Reservoirs Amplifiers
Environmental
treatment
treatment
Transmission Routes
Health
Direction of Transmission
drinking
-
water
4
Complex ecological cycle
  • How do these pathogens enter the (human) food
    chain?
  • Strong signals from (limited) environmental
    monitoring of Campylobacter often found in
    rivers, especially during floods
  • Campylobacter inactivated (by sunlight) much
    faster than a faecal indicator (E. coli)
  • Campylobacter peak coincides with flood peak
    faecal indicator (E. coli) precedes it

5
Field data
6
Field data
7
Field data
8
Kinematic wave model
  • Wave travels faster than the water
  • Hypotheses (to explain differential timing)
  • E. coli predominantly mined from sediments as
    the wave arrives
  • Campylobacter predominantly derived from land
    runoff and so arrives with the water
  • Field data support stream sediments
  • depauperate in Campylobacter
  • rich in E. coli (108 per m2)

9
Kinematic wave model
10
Kinematic wave modelctd.
  • Uses mass conservation equation replaces
    momentum equation by a simple form A aQb,
    where
  • A channel cross-section area (m2)
  • Q rate of flow of water (m3 s-1)
  • a, b parameters
  • f(friction, slope)
  • b 3/5 (Manning)
  • Inflow constant during runoff period

11
Kinetics
  • x distance (m)
  • t time (s)
  • q lateral inflow per unit channel length (m3
    s-1 m-1)
  • S sediment bacteria per unit channel length (
    m-1)
  • C aquatic bacteria per unit water volume
    (100 mL)-1
  • Cl bacteria in lateral inflow (100 mL)-1
  • k inactivation coefficient (day-1)
  • es entrainment coefficient (s-1)
  • U stream velocity (m s-1)
  • Ub baseflow velocity (m s-1)

12
(No Transcript)
13
Explicit Numerical Solution
14
Parameter set
  • As in Chapra (1997, Surface Water-Quality
    Modeling)
  • And

15
Results (no inactivation, constant Cl)
16
Results (inactivation kC 50 kE 10)
17
Conclusions
  • Field data and model ? differential delivery
    mechanisms
  • BMPs for faecal indicator may not coincide with
    those for (at least some) zoonotic pathogens
  • Value of field dataexemplary commitment of
    colleagues
  • In the model, need to
  • minimise numerical dispersion
  • include alternative entrainment assumptions
  • apply to NZ stream settings (non-prismatic
    channels)
  • Do a night-time survey?
  • How to include in general campylobacteriosis risk
    model?
  • Vital to include FST findings
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com