Joshua at Jericho - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Joshua at Jericho

Description:

Why did so few Germans resist working in the concentration camps? ... Implies that a German-style concentration would not flourish in the US, Britain, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1592
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Skip7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Joshua at Jericho


1
Joshua at Jericho
2
Salem Witch Trials
  • In 1692, 20 were executed in Massachusetts

3
Turkish-Armenian Genocide
  • 1.5 million of 2.5 million Armenians in Turkey
    were exterminated between 1915 and 1923.
  • "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation
    of the Armenians?"

4
Holocaust
  • Six million Jews (67 of Europes population)
    were exterminated
  • Others Roma, mentally retarded, mentally
    disturbed, 3 million Soviet POWs, homosexuals,
    Jehovahs Witnesses, Communists, Socialists

5
Cambodia Killing Fields
  • Pol Pot and Khmer Rouge kill 1.7 million (21 of
    population)

6
Rwanda
  • In 1994, within 100 days 800,000 Tutsis and
    moderate Hutus are exterminated

7
Kosovo Ethnic Cleansing
8
Questions Involving Genocide
  • Will genocide be a consistent state of affairs
    during the next several decades?
  • Under what conditions should the US intervene to
    prevent genocide?
  • To what extent should color, culture, religion
    and economics matter?
  • What social conditions lead otherwise good women
    and men to kill their neighbors?

9
William Shirers Analysis
  • Why did so few Germans resist working in the
    concentration camps?
  • A summation of western history since the Magna
    Carta
  • Flaw in German national character
  • Implies that a German-style concentration would
    not flourish in the US, Britain, France, Italy,
    etc

10
Nuremberg Trials
  • Hermann Goerings statement
  • Nazi defense
  • Justice Jacksons summation

11
Hannah Arendt and Adolph Eichmann
  • Arendt was a prominent social philosopher
    employed by the New York Times to cover the
    Eichmann trial
  • Summarized her conclusion in Eichmann in
    Jerusalem On the Banality of Evil

12
Adolph Eichmann
  • Eichmann His responsibilities during WWII
  • Post-war fugitive
  • Capture by the Israelis
  • What kind of person would contribute to the
    deaths of millions of persons

13
Adolph Eichmann and Arendts Hypothesis
  • Slightly above average intelligence, no sign of
    pathology on psychological tests, good organizer
  • Other than during the Final Solution there is o
    evidence of criminal activity
  • Viewed himself as a good soldier who believed
    that not one Jew died because he was born
  • Arendts Hypothesis In obedience to authority
    the average person will commit extreme
    anti-social actions such as mass murder.

14
Mai Lai
15
William Calley
  • Led massacre of 300 unarmed women, children, and
    elderly
  • Sentenced to life at hard labor
  • Served 5 months and was pardoned by Nixon
  • Married and living a normal life outside of Ft
    Benning, GA

16
Hugh Thompson
  • put his guns on Americans, said he would shoot
    them if they shot another Vietnamese, had his
    people wade in the ditch in gore to their knees,
    to their hips, took out children, took them to
    the hospital...
  • Awarded Soldiers Medal in 1996
  • Living a normal life


17
Theories of Obedience to Unjust Authority
  • Nazis were an aberration in history
  • Shirer Flaw in German character
  • Arendt Flaw in human character
  • Milgram A social psychologist looks at obedience

18
Milgrams Baseline Procedure
19
Milgrams Baseline Procedure
  • 63 shock to the limit (STL)

20
Questions From Milgrams Paradigm (1)
  • Is blind obedience to authority a distinctly
    American characteristic?
  • Did the teacher enjoy shocking the learner?
  • Does the status of the authority figure affect
    obedience?

21
Questions From Milgrams Paradigm (2)
  • Does the personality of the victim affect
    obedience?
  • Are the personalities of the maximally obedient
    and maximally rebellious subjects different?
  • How would a moral person respond in Milgrams
    study?

22
Questions From Milgrams Paradigm (3)
  • Were Milgrams results predictable?
  • Why are Milgrams results surprising?
  • A naive belief in the relationship of morality to
    behavior

23
Ethical Criticisms of Milgrams Work
  • No true informed consent
  • Participants experienced significant stress
  • Long-term negative effects on self-worth

24
Milgrams Response To Ethical Criticism
  • Extensive debriefing
  • After session discovered learner was not harmed
  • Participants were free to leave
  • No evidence of permanent psychological harm

25
Follow-up of Milgrams Participants
  • 80 reported that they were Very Glad or Glad
    they participated.
  • 15 had No Strong Feelings
  • Just over 1 were Sorry or Very Sorry
  • 80 said more research of this kind should be
    done.
  • 74 said they learned something of lasting value.

26
A Question Mark The Cost of Ethics?
  • ?

27
How To Get Good Men and Women To Murder Their
Neighbors
  • Get them to say
  • I hate or
  • I would never
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com