Projet minier aurifre Canadian Malartic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Projet minier aurifre Canadian Malartic

Description:

Projet minier aurifre Canadian Malartic – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: bernardfou
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Projet minier aurifre Canadian Malartic


1
CANADIAN MALARTIC GOLD MINE PROJECT
Impacts, mitigation measures and proposed
follow-up measures
Public Presentation No. 3June 17,
2008 Translated from French presentation (with
original French notes)
2
Plan for the evening
  • Words of welcome
  • Overview of the impact study process
  • Overview and status of the project
  • Results of the environmental evaluation
  • Physical components
  • Biological components
  • Human environment components
  • Conclusions about the companys work
  • Question period

3
OVERVIEW OF THE IMPACT STUDY PROCESS
3
4
Four main steps characterize the preparation of
the impact study
  • Characterization of the receiving environment
  • Presentation of February 2008
  • Definition and description of the study project
  • Presentation of April 2008
  • Analysis of the impacts and the proposed
    mitigation measures
  • Elaboration of monitoring and follow-up programs

4
5
OVERVIEW AND STATUS OF THE PROJECT
5
6
Project was developed based on input from many
sources
  • - Preliminary technical study outlined in winter
    of 2008
  • First draft of project
  • Many environmental inputs were considered
  • - Since March 2008
  • Weekly meetings between OSISKO and GENIVAR with
    the aim of optimizing the project to
  • Take into account local sensitivities
  • And also the technical constraints
  • - Other recommendations of the impact study
  • Will be integrated into subsequent studies
    (feasibility study, sustainable development plan,
    construction specifications, etc.)

6
7
  • Mining installations
  • Green zone

Videos showing the mining installations and green
zone were played during the public presentation.
These can be seen on Osiskos website at
Community gtgt Animations Maps http//osisko.orga
nism.ca/en/community/animations-maps.html
7
8
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
EVALUATION
8
9
Studied components
  • Physical environment
  • Streamflow regime and other surface waters
  • Groundwater and hydrogeology
  • Soils
  • Noise
  • Vibrations
  • Air quality

9
10
Stream flow regime and other surface waters
Malartic
Rivière
Route 117
Ruisseau Raymond
Ruisseau Raymond
Embranchement Mainville
Piché
Rivière
Ruisseau
7ème Rang
Ch. Lac-Mourier
Mainville
Lac Fournière
6ème Rang
10
11
Groundwater
11
12
NOISE
  • During the construction phase
  • Noise coming from the work site falling below the
    norms
  • Simulated 36 dBA (Leq 12 h) during the day and
    38 dBA (Leq 1h) at night
  • Norm 55 dBA (Leq 12 h) during the day and 45 dBA
    (Leq 1 h) at night
  • Measurements taken to obtain this result
  • Plant is 2.5 km from residential sectors
  • Main entrance to work site placed at East
    Malartic
  • During the mining phase
  • Many measures integrated into the project
  • Landscaped ridge 15 m high alongside Rue de la
    Paix
  • Other ridges (4 m) along the main circulation
    routes
  • A quieter model of truck (227 tonnes)
  • Smaller drill rigs for the first pit benches

12
13
Results of the noise contribution - first years -
57-59 dBA (Leq 1h)
Acceptable limit 40 dBA (Leq 1h) Annual follow-up
recommended
13
14
Vibrations and impacts due to dynamiting
  • Possibility of flying rock chips
  • Mainly during excavation of the first pit benches
  • Main preventative measure blast mats that
    retain rock chips
  • Risk of damage to structures
  • Very limited and below the MDDEPs criteria
  • Authorized speed 12.7 mm/s (damage would start
    at 19-20 mm/s)
  • Reduced explosive charges in the northern part of
    the pit
  • - Cannot be avoided altogether other measures
  • Blast tests before operations start
  • Quality assurance procedure to be put into place
  • Electronic detonators and modelling software
  • Monitoring during operations and building
    inspections before operations start

14
15
Network of proposed seismographs
15
16
Sensitivity of people to vibrations
  • Depends on various factors
  • - Weather/climate
  • - Air overpressures
  • - Human activities
  • - Other human factors

Painful
  • Additional mitigation measures
  • One blast per day (3.5 sec)
  • In late morning (1130) or afternoon (330)
  • Keep a sufficient reserve in the ore pile to
    avoid blasting when the weather conditions are
    unfavourable

16
17
Air quality
  • Dust during work
  • Standard management measures will continue to be
    employed
  • Particles emitted during operations
  • Measures incorporated into the design to reduce
    the impact
  • Selected exhaust systems for machinery have best
    performance
  • Water trucks (two large and one small) on site at
    all times
  • Watering of drill holes in the north part of the
    open pit
  • Enclosed conveyor belts in open-air structures
  • Cover on stockpile of crushed ore
  • Closed building for crushing complex
  • Continous monitoring recommended

17
18
Annual concentrations of particles coming from
the mine - first years -
Acceptable limit 70 ug/m3
18
19
Studied components
  • Biological environment
  • Vegetation and wetlands
  • Fauna (wildlife)
  • - Land mammals
  • - Aquatic fauna
  • - Avifauna (waterfowl, birds of prey and other
    birds)
  • - Herpetofauna (amphibians and reptiles)

19
20
Vegetation and wetlands
  • During the construction phase
  • Loss related to stripping of the vegetation cover
    and the infilling of some wetlands results in
    loss of surface area
  • Compensation measures for wetlands
  • (1 for 1 compensation no-loss principle)
  • Minimize the areas to devegetate
  • During the mining phase
  • Low to negligible impact because the
    rehabilitation work (replanting) will be done
    continuously as the cells become filled
  • During the closure phase
  • Positive impact as the vegetation planted during
    the rehabilitation work takes hold will
    represent an improvement over the current
    situtation

20
21
Fauna (wildlife)
  • During the construction phase
  • Potential loss of habitats
  • Disturbances related to noise and traffic in the
    work zones
  • During the mining phase
  • Little impact the effects will mainly be felt
    during the construction phase
  • During the closure phase
  • Positive impact due to the increase in
    forested/wooded surface area and the reduction of
    noise and traffic in the region

21
22
Studied components
  • Human environment
  • Traffic
  • Local and regional economy
  • Quality of life
  • Land use, tourism and recreation
  • Heritage and archaeology
  • Landscape

22
23
Changes to traffic conditions
23
24
Local and regional economy
  • Positive impact on the Malartic and Abitibi
    economy

24
25
Local and regional economy (contd)
  • - Creation of new private and public services in
    Malartic
  • - Increase in property values
  • - Improvement in the hireability of the
    workforce
  • Bonus measure
  • Policy aimed at maximizing the purchase of goods
    and services and hiring workers in Malartic and
    the Abitibi region

26
Local and regional economy (contd)
  • Impact related to the end of mining operations
  • Mitigation measures
  • - Fonds Essor Malartic Osisko (FEMO)
  • - Other potential mine sites under study by
    Osisko
  • Impact related to the increase in the cost of
    housing
  • Mitigation measures
  • - Town of Malartic project for the construction
    of a low-rent housing unit (supported by Osisko)
  • - Osisko agrees to maintain the rents at
    affordable levels for 3 years

26
27
Quality of life
  • Impact of the perception of risks to the health
    and psychological well-being of the population
  • Mitigation measures
  • - Publicly available information on the health
    risks
  • - Toll-free information line
  • - Interventions by a monitoring committee
  • Impact on the social cohesion of Malartic
    possible conflicts related to the arrival of new
    residents and workers, but also adds new stimulus
    to the community
  • Mitigation measures
  • Integration efforts from the entire Malartic
    community
  • Maximization of the local economic benefits
  • - Fair hiring policies (equal opportunity)

27
28
Land use, tourism and recreation
  • Impact on facilities and equipment due to the
    construction of new buildings
  • Added value for the Abitibi-Témiscamingue
    mineralogical museum due to its location next to
    an operating mine
  • Relocation of a 4-km segment of a skidoo trail
  • No impact on the quality of fishing in Lac
    Fournière (no changes to the water quality)

28
29
Heritage and archaeology
  • Impact will be related to the loss of
    institutional buildings that serve as historical
    reminders of the development of the Malartic
    community (daycare facility, Saint-Martin and
    Renaud schools)
  • Mitigation measures
  • Inventory elements of historical interest related
    to these buildings and produce a detailed
    photographic history
  • Conserve and improve the water tower
  • (the question of the Canadian Malartic headframe
    is still under study)
  • No impact on the zones of moderate archaeological
    potential, which will be avoided during project
    development

29
30
Before View from Highway 117
30
31
After View from Highway 117
31
32
Before View from Avenue St-Louis - Rue La Salle
32
33
After View from Avenue St-Louis - Rue La Salle
Monument, sculpture or interpretation panel
33
34
Before View from Chemin du Lac-Mourier
34
35
After View from Chemin du Lac-Mourier
35
36
Before View from Range Road 7 East
36
37
After View from Range Road 7 East
37
38
Before View from Rue de la Paix - Ave DHochelaga
38
39
After View from Rue de la Paix - Ave DHochelaga
39
40
  • COMMITMENTS FROM OSISKO MINING CORPORATION
  • Minimize our impacts
  • Striving towards a carbon neutral goal (zero
    carbon footprint )
  • Implement monitoring programs for vibrations,
    dust and the noise level during operations
  • Put into place a monitoring/follow-up committee
  • Maximize the economic and job benefits for the
    Malartic community
  • Keep the Malartic population and other related
    parties informed

40
41
What happens next
  • Impact study report will be finalized
  • Writing to be finished summer 2008
  • Submit dossier to MDDEP September 2008
  • Admissibility study by the MDDEP
  • Questions and comments fall 2008
  • Dossier made public end of 2008
  • BAPE activities
  • Period of public information beginning 2009
  • Public hearing if required, winter or spring
    2009
  • Decree authorizing the project
  • Final study by authorities spring/summer 2009
  • Decision of the Conseil des Ministres summer
    2009

41
42
  • Future work
  • Closure of the East Malartic site
  • Arrival of maintenance trucks
  • The first homes moved
  • Vibration tests
  • Dismantling of the existing plant
  • Start of construction institutional buildings

42
43
END OF PRESENTATIONEnvironmental Impact
Studyof the Canadian Malartic Gold Mine
Projectof Osisko Mining Corporation
43
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com