Serving the New Millennials - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Serving the New Millennials

Description:

'A generation is also defined as a series of birth cohorts ... Madonna kisses Brittany Spears. The Panthers go to the super Bowl. Janet's Wardrobe malfunction ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: kimberleb
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Serving the New Millennials


1
Serving the New Millennials
  • Dwight L. Bailey, Psy.D.
  • South Carolina State University
  • Career Center

2
Outline of the Presentation
I. The Nature of Generations II. Who they
are and who they are not III. Implications of
the Zeitgeist IV. Career Centers Serving the
Millennials V. Recruiters hiring the
Millennials VI. Employing the Millennials VII.
Bibliography
3
Generation defined
  • A generation is also defined as a series of
    birth cohorts who share a common location in
    history and a common peer persona that reflects
    their collective identity as well as a sense of
    having shared experiences.
  • (Strauss in Lowery, 2001)

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
4
I. The Nature of Generations
  • Cyclical (based on research done between 1433 and
    1584)
  • Approximately 20 years in length
  • Traits/character/values are framed around the
    zeitgeists of the formative years
  • Well established by early thirties
  • Strauss Howe (1991)

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
5
Influential Zeitgeists
  • WORLD CRISES focus on reordering the outer
    world of institutions
  • SPIRITUAL MOVEMENTS focus on changing the inner
    world of values
  • People/students develop a peer personality
    shared events in their formative years (ages 10
    18) have an impact on generational value systems

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
6
CAVEATS
  • Generations do not abruptly change
  • there are transitions
  • Descriptive norms not all members of a
  • generation fit the mold

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
7
II. Who they are not
  • CIVIC GI
  • Born 1901 1924
  • Formative years 1911- 1942
  • Won WWI and built powerful corporations
  • Heroes

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
8
Who they are not
  • ADAPTIVE SILENT
  • Born 1925 1942
  • Formative Years 1935 1960
  • Matured into conformist adults after growing up
    as overprotected and suffocated youths during the
    Depression and WWII
  • Artists

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
9
Who they are not
  • IDEALIST BOOMER
  • Born 1943 1960
  • Formative Years 1953 1978
  • Reflect self-indulgence and an inward focus
  • The most visible generation of the century
  • Came of age during the consciousness awakening of
    the 60s and 70s
  • Prophets

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
10
Who they are not
  • REACTIVE Boomlet, 13th Generation, Generation
    X
  • Born 1961 1981
  • Formative Years 1971 1998
  • True children of 60s and 70s
  • Grew up as under-protected and criticized youth
    during the Boomers consciousness awakening
  • Older members of this generation are criticized
    for their risk-taking behaviors and their
    alienated, caustic view of life
  • Nomads

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
11
Who They Are
  • CIVIC
    Millennials
  • Born 1982 2002
  • Formative Years 1992 2019
  • Similar in peer personality to the GI/CIVIC
    generation of George Bush
  • Currently being nurtured, protected and
    disciplined to keep them from harm

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
12
The Current Generation
  • Millennials
  • Echo Boom
  • Generation Y
  • Generation Next
  • Generation Tech
  • Boomer Babies
  • Generation Why?
  • Generation.com

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
13
Critical events, factors, trends in their
formative years
  • September 11, 2001
  • Clinton Presidency
  • School Violence
  • National Security Levels
  • Oklahoma City Bombing
  • Million Man March
  • Virginia Sniper
  • McGwire, Sosa, and Bonds
  • Bush vs. Gore Election
  • War in Kosovo
  • War in IRAQ
  • Death of Princess Diana
  • Rodney King Riots
  • Monica Lowinsky scandal
  • Corp scandals
  • Celebrity trials

14
Critical events, factors, trends in their
formative years
  • MOVIES
  • The Passion
  • Harry Potter
  • Shrek
  • Mosters Inc
  • The Hobbit
  • The Simpsons
  • The Rugrats
  • South Park
  • Madonna kisses Brittany Spears
  • The Panthers go to the super Bowl
  • Janets Wardrobe malfunction

15
Critical events, factors, trends in their
formative years
  • Fast computers,Road runner access, Palm, mp3,
    Cell phone, two way pager, laptop
  • Text messaging
  • Instant messenger
  • Camera Watches
  • X-box, Nintendo
  • DVD capability in vans and suv

16
Implications of the Zeitgeist
  • Students Rate-Important or Very Important
  • 73.6 - being very well off financially
  • 69.8 - ability to make more money
  • 70.3 - to be able to get a better job
  • 71.3 - to get training for a specific
    career
  • 43.1 - developing a meaningful philosophy
    of life
  • (H.E.R.I., 2001)

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
17
Implications
  • Students Rate-Little importance or Not important
  • becoming an authority in their chosen field
    (59.9)
  • obtaining recognition from their colleagues for
    contributions to their field (51.3)
  • having administrative responsibilities for the
    work of others (37.2)
  • (H.E.R.I., 2001)

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
18
Implications
  • Frequently bored in class (41.1) and
    academically disengaged
  • Students increasingly concerned about college as
    a means to an end, but not as concerned about the
    learning process itself
  • Majors and career paths often decided by parents
  • Parents make choices between internship and
    summer school
  • Graduating seniors choose jobs near their family

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
19
Implications
  • Students are more focused on local activism and
    service learning or community service and less
    focused on national, international and global
    matters
  • (H.E.R.I., 2001)
  • this has change significantly in the aftermath
    of Sept. 11
  • 47.5 participated in organized demonstrations in
    2000
  • 82.6 performed volunteer work
  • 57.1 performed community service as part of a
    class
  • Keeping up with political affairs low (31.4 vs.
    60.3 in 1966)
  • Increase since Sept. 11

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
20
Implications
  • Using technology intensely and keeping up with
    changes in technology
  • Uses a computer more than 20 times per week to
    complete a tasks and or recreationally
  • 93.0 between 18 and 20
  • 82.5 between 15 and 18
  • 74.4 between 12 and 15
  • 57.3 below 12

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
21
Millennials Are
  • Conventional....Rule Driven
  • Confident..w/ little RWE
  • Sense of EntitlementLack Resourcefulness
  • Sheltered...Not thick skinned
  • Community MindedStay close to home
  • Ends Oriented.Not means
  • Fast orientedNot Quality
  • Team- Oriented..Synergy-connected
  • (Howe Strauss, 2000)

Spencer and Spencer, Chicago 2001
22
Career Centers Serving the Millennials
  • Technologically sophisticated presentations
  • Use of wireless technology
  • Virtual fairs
  • Teleconferencing ability
  • Use of on-line services, newsletters, job
    postings, chat rooms, bulletin boards, black
    boards

23
Career Centers Serving the Millennials
  • Traditional, classic and attractive offices with
    21st century amenities
  • Coaching
  • Give them the rules
  • Use assessments to help make informed decisions
  • Bridge gap between reality and expectations

24
Career Centers Serving the Millenials
  • Service learning
  • Service to university
  • Global programs, study/intern abroad

25
Recruiters Hiring Millenials
  • Create opportunities for open dialog with
    students
  • Give candid feedback to staff about student
    performance
  • Dispel myths about what is negotiable
  • Clarify culture of the organization
  • Technologically sophisticated presentations
  • Use of wireless technology
  • Virtual fairs
  • Teleconferencing ability

26
Employing the Millenials
  • Introduce and enforce rules
  • Communicate your high ethical standards
  • Provide opportunities to work on teams
  • Allow for community service involvement
  • Emphasis the importance of quality over speed
  • Encourage the learning from the process
  • Reward based on effort not results

27
Bibliography
  • Argetsinger, A. (2001). At colleges, students
    are facing a big test. Washington Post,
  • September 17, p. BO1.
  • Flacks, R., Thomas, S.L. (1998). Among
    affluent students, a culture of
  • disengagement. Chronicle of Higher Education,
    November 27, p. A48.
  • Hansen, E.J. (1998). Essential demographics of
    todays college students. AAHE
  • Bulletin, November, 5(3).
  • Higher Education Research Institute (2001). The
    American freshman National norms
  • for fall 2001. Los Angeles UCLA Graduate
    School of Education and
  • Information Studies.
  • Howe, N., Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials
    rising The next great generation. New
  • York Vintage Books.
  • Keeling, R.P. (2000). In loco whom? Networks
    wired and human. Presentation at the annual
    conference of the American College Personnel
    Association, April, Washington, D.C
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com