Terrance M' Scott, University of Florida - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Terrance M' Scott, University of Florida

Description:

Christine Christle, University of Kentucky Kristine Jolivette, University of Kentucky ... ZERO TOLERANCE FOR UNDESIRED BEHAVIOR! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: EDS3
Learn more at: http://edjj.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Terrance M' Scott, University of Florida


1
Positive Behavioral Support and Delinquency
Prevention
  • Terrance M. Scott, University of Florida
  • Carl J. Liaupsin, University of Arizona
  • Christine Christle, University of Kentucky
    Kristine Jolivette, University of Kentucky
  • C. Michael Nelson, University of Kentucky

2
Agenda
  • The Students and the Problem
  • A Model for Delinquency Prevention Positive
    Behavior Support
  • Examples

3
Labels for youth who manifest patterns of
antisocial behavior
  • Socially maladjusted (exclusion/illogical)
  • Juvenile delinquent (legal term/adjudicated)
  • Juvenile offender (age of majority/committed a
    legal or status offense)
  • These labels are not educationally relevant
  • Do not relate to the characteristics or needs of
    the individuals

4
Risk Factors
  • Ethnic minority status
  • Aggressive, antisocial behavior
  • Difficulties in school
  • School failure (including educational
    disabilities)
  • Poverty
  • Broken home
  • Inadequate parental supervision
  • Lax or inconsistent parental discipline
  • Coercive family interactions
  • Physical abuse
  • Substance abuse (self or family)
  • Living in a high crime community
  • Criminal or delinquent relatives or peers

5
Where do you findjuvenile offenders?
  • General and special education classrooms
  • Alternative schools
  • Day treatment programs
  • Detention or correctional facilities

Most
Few
6
How do Schools Respond to Student Behavior
Problems?
  • A suburban high school with 1400 pupils reported
    over 2000 office referrals from Sept. to Feb. of
    one school year
  • In 1998-99, 74,565 suspensions and 3,603
    expulsions were reported in Kentucky schools
  • ZERO TOLERANCE FOR UNDESIRED BEHAVIOR!

7
Student Interactions with the School
Students who exhibit challenging behaviors have
  • higher rates of negative interactions with school
    personnel regardless of their behavior
  • higher rates of punitive consequences than their
    peers
  • this tends to make behaviors worse
  • lower rates academic engaged time with teacher
    perpetuates cycle of problem behavior

(Wehby et al. 1996 Shores et al. 1996)
8

Ineffective Interventions
800
Reviews of over studies involving
children with the most challenging behaviors
(Gottfredson, 1997 Lipsky, 1996) indicate

the smallest intervention effect-sizes for
  • Counseling sending problem students to talk to
    the counselor
  • Psychotherapy sending problem students to
    talk with psychotherapists
  • Punishment reacting to behavior without
    facilitating success

9
Long-Term Predictable Failure
  • Students with a history of chronic and pervasive
    behavioral problems and associated academic
    deficits are more likely to go to jail than to
    graduate from high school
  • Three years after leaving school, 70 of
    antisocial youth have been arrested (Walker,
    Colvin, Ramsey, 1995)
  • 82 of all crimes are committed by people who
    have dropped out of school (APA Commission on
    Youth Violence, 1993)

10
Initial Failures Lead to Challenging Behavior
RISK FACTORS
OUTCOMES

fall behind academically gtgt difficult work gtgt
challenging behaviors gtgt removal from class gtgt
Poverty
School Safety Issues
The Academic- Behavior Connection
Poor Modeling
School Exclusion
ReadingDeficits
Life-Long Failure
11
Kentucky
  • Grade Level CTBS Predictors
    R-Square
  • Grade 3 1. Poverty level .400 2.
    Attendance rate .432 3. Number of
    expulsions .456
  • Grade 6 1. Poverty level .458 2.
    Attendance rate .546 3. Number of
    suspensions .555
  • Grade 9 1. Poverty level .521 2.
    Attendance rate .628 3. Dropout
    rate .646 4. Enrollment
    .655

12
Illinois
  • http//206.166.105.35/designation/indicators.htm

13
Summary of the Problem
  • So Far
  • Labels characteristics
  • Ineffective School Responses
  • Need to Predict Problems
  • Academic Behavior Connection
  • Poverty predicts failure
  • Next
  • A Model for Prevention PBS

14
Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency
  • Primary Prevention
  • Prevent initial offending
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Prevent re-offending
  • Tertiary Prevention
  • Ameliorate effects of persistent offending

15
Positive Behavior Support
  • Positive behaviorgoal is for students to develop
    a repertoire of appropriate skills that enable
    them to participate successfully in a broad range
    of family, school, and community settings.
  • Supporta continuum of strategies provided at the
    appropriate level of personalization, given the
    strengths, needs, and preferences of the student
    and family.

16
Positive Behavior Support
  • A broad range of systemic and individualized
    strategies for achieving important social and
    learning outcomes while preventing problem
    behavior
  • An integration of (a) valued outcomes, (b) the
    science of human behavior, (c) validated
    procedures, and (d) systems change to enhance
    quality of life and reduce problem behavior

17
BIG PBS IDEAS
  • Use what works
  • Build capacity
  • Take responsibility for all students
  • Be proactive
  • Work smarter

18
ALL STUDENTS
19
Positive Behavior Support ModelLevels of
Prevention




Intensive Individual Interventions (1-3 of
students)
Intensive Individual Interventions (1-3 of
students)
Intensive Individual Interventions (1-3 of
students)

Tertiary
Targeted Classroom and Small Group
Strategies (7-9 of students)
Targeted Classroom and Small Group
Strategies (7-9 of students)
Targeted Classroom and Small Group
Strategies (7-9 of students)
Secondary
Universal School-Wide Systems of Support (90 of
students)
Universal School-Wide Systems of Support (90 of
students)
Universal School-Wide Systems of Support (90 of
students)
Primary
Adapted from George Sugai, 1996
Adapted from George Sugai, 1996
20
Universal InterventionsPrimary Prevention
  • Elements
  • Rules
  • agreed upon by team - willing/able to enforce
  • posted, brief, positively stated
  • Routines
  • avoid problem contexts, times, groupings, etc.
  • consistent
  • Arrangements
  • clear physical boundaries
  • supervision of all areas

21
Targeted InterventionsSecondary Prevention
800
Reviews of over studies involving
children with the most challenging behaviors
(Gottfredson, 1997 Lipsky, 1996) indicate
the largest intervention effect-sizes for
  • Social skills training teach specific skills
    using effective instruction
  • Behaviorally based intervention effective
    use of reinforcement/punishment to facilitate
    success
  • Academic curricular restructuring intensive
    instruction in reading

22
Intensive InterventionsTertiary Prevention
  • Elements
  • planning for involvement of community
    resources as necessary
  • in-depth and continuous assessment from a
    variety of sources and perspectives
  • write activities into formal plans where
    necessary (IEP)

23
Summary of the Model
  • In This Section
  • Prevention of juvenile offending
  • Positive Behavioral Support
  • Primary/Universal
  • Secondary/Targeted
  • Tertiary/Intensive
  • Now
  • Examples

24
EXAMPLE Teaching Behavior
  • Hands and feet to self or
  • Respect others
  • 22 4

25
EXAMPLE Teachable Expectations
  • 1. Respect Yourself -in the classroom (do your
    best) -on the playground (follow safety rules)
  • 2. Respect Others -in the classroom (raise
    your hand to speak) -in the stairway (single
    file line)
  • 3. Respect Property -in the classroom (ask
    before borrowing) -in the lunchroom (pick up
    your mess)

26
ExampleKY KIDS Schools Project
  • 66 reduction in office referrals
  • 64 reduction in suspensions and expulsions

27
EXAMPLE Harrison School-Wide Objectives
  • By the end of the year, number of referrals to
    SAFE will be reduced by at least 30 across all
    students
  • By the end of the year, number of suspensions
    will be reduced by at least 30 across all
    students and minority students
  • By the end of the year, reading scores will
    increase across each grade and across the school

28
Time Spent Away from Academics Due to Behavior
  • Convert Data from number of hours
  • To Average Hours
  • (standardizes data for comparisons)

29
Student Days School Suspension

76
75
30
Academics Baseline - Year 1
  • CTBS Scores
  • Reading
  • Language
  • Math

1997 1998
1999
Baseline Baseline Intervention
Change
21 19 27 42
21 20 30 50
26 20 30 50
31
OSEP Center for Education, Disabilities, and
Juvenile Justicewww.edjj.org
  • University of Maryland
  • University of Kentucky
  • Arizona State University
  • Eastern Kentucky University
  • PACER Center
  • American Institutes of Research

32
OSEP Center for Positive Behavioral
Interventions and Supporthttpwww.pbis.org
  • University of Oregon
  • University of Kentucky
  • University of Missouri
  • University of Kansas
  • University of South Florida

33
www.state.ky.us/agencies/behave/homepage.html
Information and Links
Job Opportunities Discussion Forums Behavioral
Interventions Links to Other Resources Behavioral
Consultation Legal Information More . . .
Sponsored by The University of Kentucky and the
Kentucky Dept. of Education
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com