Sediment pollution from agricultural land: Sources, pathways and mitigation Mike Palmer Paul Quinn, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Sediment pollution from agricultural land: Sources, pathways and mitigation Mike Palmer Paul Quinn,

Description:

Field scale (Paradise Field, Cockle Park Farm) Farm scale (Nafferton Farm) ... Cockle Park drainage experiment. Discharge monitoring. Flow interval sampling. 100 m ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:285
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: MikeP62
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sediment pollution from agricultural land: Sources, pathways and mitigation Mike Palmer Paul Quinn,


1
Sediment pollution from agricultural land
Sources, pathways and mitigationMike
PalmerPaul Quinn, Jennine Jonczyk, David Rimmer
2
Background
While extreme soil erosion in the UK is rare,
there is a pressing need for policy intervention
and better understanding of the processes
involved in aquatic sediment pollution
(Boardman, 2002). Particulate matter a major
vector of pollutants e.g. 90 of P flux in
rivers and lakes in Europe and N. America may be
associated with suspended sediment (FAO, 1996).
Managing pollution by managing runoff?
  • FAO, 1996. Control of water pollution from
    agriculture - FAO irrigation and drainage paper
    55.
  • Boardman, J 2002. The need for soil conservation
    in Britain revisited. Area 34 419-427.

3
Project
  • What are the sources and pathways of sediment
    pollution?
  • What are the best means of control?
  • Fitness for purpose
  • Value for money
  • Acceptability to farmer
  • Field scale (Paradise Field, Cockle Park Farm)
  • Farm scale (Nafferton Farm)
  • Small catchment scale (Belford Burn)

4
Nafferton Farm experimental catchment
Catchment size 65 ha Mixed cereal/dairy pasture
Slowly permeable soils Tile drainage
5
Trial mitigation features
Sediment trap and P filter
Live willow dam
Wetland
6
30 April 2008
7
Sediment sources
Runoff from arable land
Runoff from pasture
8
Runoff from tracks/hardstandings
9
Sediment sources
Tile drains
10
30/04/2008 Sediment trap
11
30/04/2008 Sediment trap
12
30/04/2008 Sediment trap
18 hour event period Sediment input 650.2
kg Sediment output 150.0kg Sediment capture
398.8 kg (77)
13
30/04/2008 Sediment trap
14
30/04/2008 Wetland
High flow remobilises trapped sediment
15
Nafferton conclusions
  • Majority of sediment mobilised during runoff
    events.
  • Sediment can be trapped efficiently during
    events.
  • Removing sediment has a large impact on nutrient
    loads.
  • Sediment should be captured upstream of chemical
    and biological treatments.

But is prevention better than cure?......
Redesigned sediment trap
16
Sediment source fingerprinting
Channel banks
Surface soil
Tile drains
Track runoff
Outlet sediment analysis
Source material analysis
Fingerprint parameter selection (Discriminant
function analysis)
Multivariate mixing model
Sediment source apportionment
17
Cockle Park drainage experiment
  • 3 treatments
  • Conventional till
  • Direct drill (min. till)
  • Broadcast (zero till)

100 m
  • Discharge monitoring
  • Flow interval sampling

18
Belford Burn Catchment area 6 km2 NVZ
status CSF area status Budle Bay NNR, SSSI
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
  • What are the sources of sediment?
  • Different land uses
  • Surface and subsurface pathways
  • Can runoff control structures be truly
    multi-functional?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com