Using Professional Judgment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


PPT – Using Professional Judgment PowerPoint presentation | free to view - id: 1b2150-MmEwN


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation

Using Professional Judgment


Strengthen financial aid administrator knowledge base ... Annuity distributions. Untaxed Income. Child support. Workers compensation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 90
Provided by: rko82


Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using Professional Judgment

Using Professional Judgment
Session Overview
  • Past as prologue
  • Professional judgment what, when, why
  • Willingness and ability to pay
  • Income assessment
  • Asset assessment
  • Family contribution
  • Summary

Session Goals
  • Strengthen financial aid administrator knowledge
  • Emphasize relationship of professional judgment
    to equity
  • Support high professional standards

Past as Prologue
  • John Monro - The Father of Need Analysis
  • As the competition for enrollment and talent
    gets tighter, as it will, we may undercut the
    old-fashioned idea that financial aid is intended
    to help the needy and deserving scholar, and that
    well-off families should help themselves. We will
    do ourselves and the country no good if we
    diminish the force of this fine old idea.

Present and Future
  • Reauthorization and the politics of financial aid
  • Cost of higher education
  • Process simplicity
  • Access denied
  • PJ protection
  • The economy

Financial Aid Administrators Role
  • Steward of funds
  • Advocate for access
  • Systems manager
  • Professional activist

Truisms of Professional Judgment
  • Rooted in a good understanding of need analysis
  • Relies on financial aid administrator
  • With authority comes responsibility

Goal of Need Analysis
  • Sensitive evaluation of the financial strength of
    applicants in a fair and consistent manner with
    attention to varying types of income, assets and
    family circumstances

Professional Judgment What Is It?
  • Decision process to alter standard assessment
    when unique or exceptional circumstances impact a
    familys ability to pay for college
  • PJ in FM Authority granted in the Higher
    Education Act for aid administrators to exercise
    discretion in specific areas of student aid

Higher Education Act - Section 479A
  • Nothing shall be interpreted as limiting the
    authority of the financial aid administrator, on
    the basis of adequate documentation, to make
    adjustments on a case-by-case basis to the cost
    of attendance or the values of the data items
    required to calculate the expected student or
    parent contribution to allow for treatment of an
    individual eligible applicant with special

Professional Judgment Why?
  • Gives aid administrators the authority to
    consider individual circumstances
  • Enables responsiveness to student circumstances
    that cant be fully anticipated in legislation or
  • Promotes access by targeting delivery of aid to
    qualified students in need

Professional Expectations
  • Computers make calculation of family contribution
    easy invisible
  • Whats behind the screen?
  • Aid professionals must understand methodology or
    cant be sure FC or PJ decision is appropriate

Aid Professionals Doctors -Proper Diagnosis
  • Doctor
  • Examines patient
  • Evaluates symptoms
  • Makes diagnosis
  • Develops treatment plan
  • FA Professional
  • Examines application
  • Evaluates special circumstances
  • Makes adjustments
  • Develops financing plan

Professional Concerns
  • Families more likely to challenge doctors and aid
    administrator decisions now than in past.
  • Willingness vs. ability to exercise professional
  • Depends on campus circumstances
  • Scope of federal authority
  • Accountability
  • Uncertainty

Professional Judgment What is Involved?
  • Identifying special circumstances outside of
    standard assessment
  • Judging validity of adjustments
  • Evaluating the scope of adjustments
  • Developing adequate documentation
  • Maintaining consistent practice
  • PJ is time-consuming finding the proper balance
    is tough

Professional Judgment - Decisions
  • Evaluating
  • Are adjustments appropriate?
  • Implementing
  • Where to make adjustments?
  • Cost of attendance
  • Educationally-related expenses such as books
    computers other expenses such as child care
  • Need analysis data elements
  • Income
  • Assets
  • Family size, dependency status

Decisions Supported by Data
  • Professional judgment allows aid administrators
    to use data that best represents current family
  • Professional judgment cannot be based only on a
    feeling it must also be based on a reasonable
    level of data information pertaining to
  • the financial resources of a family (income
    and assets)
  • nondiscretionary expenses (i.e., medical,
    family maintenance)
  • functional (or not) relationships within the

Evaluating Data
  • Source
  • Letters from applicants and/or third parties
  • Accuracy
  • Verified using tax returns and other
  • Appropriateness
  • Information that reflects a familys current
    circumstances and ongoing capacity to pay

Professional Judgment Federal Methodology
  • What you can do
  • Can must exercise PJ on case-by-case basis
  • Change data values (but not data elements or
    allowance values)
  • Adjust cost of attendance

Professional Judgment Federal Methodology
  • What you cannot do
  • Adjust methodology
  • Change bottom line contribution
  • Treat an ineligible student as eligible
  • Cannot make an otherwise federally independent
    student dependent

Professional Judgment Institutional Flexibility
  • Institutionally-defined flexibility
  • Discretion in use of institutional funds
  • Adjust data values and elements
  • Adjust methodology
  • Define acceptable documentation
  • Group applicants with like circumstances
  • Not limited to case-by-case adjustments
  • Determines level of individual aid administrator

Professional Judgment FM or IM - Use it Wisely
  • With flexibility comes responsibility
  • Professional judgment is not a toolto legitimize
    negotiation or to manipulate results or to
    manage enrollment.

Responsibility Accountability -Challenges
  • Balance PJ frequency
  • Manage policy and process
  • Determine documentation
  • Confront ambiguity
  • Accept responsibility

Professional Judgment A Delicate Balance
  • Too Much
  • Undermines consistency
  • Consumes time
  • Changes need analysis system
  • Not Enough
  • Depersonalizes
  • Fosters rigidity
  • Either Extreme ..
  • Contributes to ineffective resource management
  • Impacts access
  • Creates validity concerns

Professional Judgment - Institutional Policy
  • Standardizes treatment of frequent circumstances
  • Defines level of individual aid administrator
  • Triggers review of students with like
  • Determines funding options
  • Grant vs. self-help
  • Impact of creating unmet need
  • States when professional judgment is not used

Professional Judgment - Institutional Process
  • Proactive aid administrator takes initiative,
  • Reactive student requests review
  • Individual authority
  • Staff committee process
  • Supports consistency
  • Enhances staff development

Professional Judgment -Documentation
  • Not defined in federal regulation
  • Institutional forms promote consistency
  • Additional information request
  • What is reasonable?
  • Supports independent review
  • Audit
  • Institutional self-assessment
  • Replication by department peers

Professional Judgment -Documentation
  • Why, what, who, when
  • Rationale for decision
  • How calculation was adjusted
  • Supporting documentation
  • Quantitative qualitative
  • Staff name date of decision
  • Paper or electronic format
  • Written notification to applicant

  • To give away money is an easy matter, and in any
    (wo)mans power. But to decide to whom to give
    it, and how large and when and for what purpose
    and how is neither in every (wo)mans power, nor
    an easy matter. Hence, it is that such excellence
    is rare, praiseworthy and noble.
  • Aristotle

  • Need AnalysisMore than a function key

Philosophy of Need-Based Aid
  • Paying for college is a partnership
  • First responsibility of student and family
  • Aid is a supplement to family resources
  • Dependency status defines partnership

Family Responsibility
  • Need analysis measures
  • ability to pay
  • not willingness

Parent / Student Responsibility
  • Parent
  • Support expected to extent of ability
  • Trend in responsibility shift to student
  • Single parent household issues
  • Noncustodial parents
  • Marital relationships end but parental
    responsibility endures

Parent Responsibility
  • Stepparent responsibility
  • FM requires data
  • How appropriate is expectation?
  • Nontraditional family structures
  • Same-gender parents
  • Others in surrogate parent role

Parent Responsibility Issues
  • When need analysis involves
  • more than numbers

Need Analysis
  • Goal
  • A reasonable family contribution
  • Snapshot of family financial resources
  • Methodology a starting point

Expected Family Contribution An Investment
  • With reasonable FC computation, most families
    manage without major lifestyle changes
  • Education like other large investments
  • Payment over time
  • Saving before college
  • Paying from current income
  • Borrowing against future income

Principles of Need Analysis
  • Equity Fairness in need analysis
  • Horizontal Equity
  • Consistent treatment of people in similar
  • Vertical Equity
  • Appropriately differing treatment of people in
    different circumstances

Principles of Need Analysis
  • Basic family needs come first
  • Need analysis provides allowances for
    non-discretionary expenses
  • After measuring discretionary resources, need
    analysis assesses the portion available for
    educational costs

Effective Need Analysis Key Characteristics
  • Equity
  • Validity
  • Consistency
  • Reasonable family contribution

Effective Need Analysis
  • Sound professional judgment promotes equity and
    access using FM or IM
  • Flexibility to recognize special family
  • Supports validity of need analysis
  • Yields more reasonable assessments

Case Study 1 - Unwilling Parents
  • Lou and Louise Lewis have the ability to pay
    their daughter Lili's college expenses, but are
    not willing to do so because they disapprove of
    decisions she has made. Lili is 18, and a high
    school senior. She moved out of the Lewis' home
    in December of her senior year to live with her
  • At the time she moved out, Lili was pregnant and
    has since had an abortion, which is contrary to
    her parents' strong religious beliefs. Lili's
    boyfriend is 23 years old. He works odd jobs, but
    usually draws unemployment compensation.
  • Lili has been admitted to a college in her
    hometown. She wants to attend, but says that she
    will not leave her boyfriend who does not have
    any funds with which to assist her.

Income in Need Analysis
  • Income is the major determinant of family

Goal Identify students and familys recurring
annual income
Taxable Income
  • Alimony
  • Unemployment compensation
  • Taxable social security
  • Taxable pensions
  • Taxable IRA
  • Annuity distributions
  • Wages, salaries, tips
  • Interest
  • Dividends
  • Business income
  • Farm income
  • Capital gains
  • Rental income royalties

Untaxed Income
  • Child support
  • Workers compensation
  • SSI / Disability benefits
  • Untaxed Social Security income
  • TANF
  • Untaxed interest income

Protecting Family Income
  • FM and IM related allowances
  • Federal, FICA, state other taxes
  • Employment Allowance
  • Income Protection Allowance (IPA)
  • Medical/dental expenses
  • IM standard
  • FM adjustment (case-by-case)
  • Elementary/secondary tuition expense
  • IM option
  • FM adjustment (case-by-case)
  • Annual Education Savings Allowance
  • IM standard
  • FM - no equivalent

Allowances for Taxes
  • Federal income tax
  • Self-reported or verified
  • FICA
  • Self-reported or from W-2
  • State and other taxes
  • FM and IM derivations differ

Did you Know?
  • What does the FICA acronym represent?
  • F
  • I
  • C
  • A

Employment Allowance
  • Eligibility
  • Double-income households, or
  • Single working parent
  • Recognizes work-related expenses due to being
    away from household

Income Protection Allowance
  • Updated annually
  • FM CPI based on 1967 BLS data
  • IM Consumer Expenditure Survey
  • No discretion over use of this income
  • Family not expected to subsist on this allowance
  • FM supports one national standard
  • IM supports regional adjustment option

Income Assessment
  • Vertical equity supports relative sacrifice
  • Marginal assessment rates
  • FM 22-47
  • IM 22-46
  • Student income assessed at higher rate if no
    dependents other than spouse

Income in Need Analysis -Think about
  • Base year income
  • Is base year the best predictor?
  • Cash flow vs. declared taxable untaxed income

Income in Need Analysis -Think about
  • What else might be affected if you decide to
    adjust income?
  • FISAP reporting
  • Eligibility for some state grant programs
  • Allowances which are derived from total income
    (e.g., state and other taxes in FM and multiple
    allowances in IM).

Professional Judgment Income Issues
  • Annual income fluctuation
  • Degree of choice
  • Frequency of fluctuation
  • One-time event vs. recurring
  • Renewal impact of PJ

Fluctuating Income
  • Increases in income
  • Capital gains
  • Severance or bonus payments
  • Overtime earnings
  • Unemployment compensation
  • Seasonal employment
  • Gambling winnings
  • Reductions in income
  • Voluntary early retirement
  • Capital business losses
  • Business losses
  • Business use of home
  • Tax write-offs
  • Depreciation

Fluctuating Income To Adjust or Not
  • Documentation
  • Letter from employer
  • Pay stubs from this time last year
  • Multiple years of tax returns
  • Possible treatments
  • Multiple year average
  • Estimated year
  • Consider impact on renewal application

Case Study 2 - Fluctuating Parent Income
  • Frank and Flo Flux both have jobs with incomes
    that vary
  • significantly from year to year.
  • Frank is a long-distance truck driver who
    frequently experiences periods of unemployment
    and who at other times may earn considerable
    overtime pay. His earned income plus unemployment
    compensation for the past three years has been
    41,372, 54,660, and 38,000. In a letter to the
    aid office, Frank projected earnings of 31,000
    this year, stating that he expects lower income
    because of the incursion of Mexican trucks into
    California, his base.
  • Flo sells cars on commission, and her income for
    the past three years has been 24,342, 31,690,
    36,007. She projects 33,000 for the current
  • There are four in the family. Their son,
    Fletcher, will be a freshman in college and their
    daughter will be a college junior. Their assets
    are negligible.

Case Study 3 Students Projected Income
  • Gloria Garcia is a 25-year-old single independent
    student without dependents who is about to begin
    college full-time after being a retail clerk for
    7 years. She will continue to live alone in the
    apartment that she rents and for which she pays
    600 a month. Her base year income was 18,000
    and she reported 500 in savings.
  • Gloria plans to cut back her hours at work when
    she begins school. She expects to earn 1,500 a
    month in the first 8 months of the year prior to
    starting school, and 750 a month thereafter. She
    says that she will have no funds for college
    expenses and needs financial aid.

Exceptional Expenses
  • Examples
  • Elder/dependent care
  • Educational debt
  • Uninsured losses
  • Bankruptcies
  • Natural disasters
  • Funerals
  • Divorce expenses
  • Legal fees
  • Debts to IRS
  • Not recognized instandard analysis
  • Level of choice
  • Discretionary
  • Required
  • Frequency
  • Isolated instance
  • Recurring

Exceptional Expenses - Documentation
  • Family statement detailing expense
  • Third party corroboration
  • Receipts
  • Payment agreements
  • Insurance statements
  • Other

Exceptional Expenses Possible Treatments
  • Reduce income
  • Reduce AGI
  • FAFSA Worksheet C (Title IV exclusions)
  • IM allowance
  • Increase taxes paid
  • Reduce assets
  • Increase cost of attendance

Case Study 4 - Exceptional Expenses
  • Jim and Judy Johnson have a combined income of
    90,000, and savings and investments of 120,000.
    They have three children. One will be a freshman
    in college in the fall and one a sophomore in
    high school.
  • The third is a 27-year-old, Jim, who has severe
    emotional problems and is living in a group home.
    The cost of the group home is 15,000 a year, all
    of which the Johnsons pay. Additionally, they
    spend 1,200 a year for special assistance, which
    Jim is expected to need for the rest of his life.
  • Judy's 70-year-old widowed mother is living in a
    nearby town. Her sole source of income is Social
    Security of 1,200 a month. The Johnsons
    contribute 10,000 a year to help her meet her

Assets in Need Analysis - Principles
  • Asset analysis supports a more
    comprehensive measure of financial strength and
  • Assets provide a measure of choice in meeting
    current expenses and planning for the future.

Assets in Need Analysis - Issues
  • Assessment a sensitive issue
  • Liquid vs. non-liquid
  • FM IM treatments differ
  • Asset shifting
  • Student to sibling or parent
  • Valuation may be problematic

Assets in Need Analysis -Considerations
  • Accumulated income
  • Inheritance
  • Retirement planning
  • Educational savings
  • Family emergencies

Defining Assets - FM and IM
  • Cash, savings, checking
  • Money market funds
  • Equity in real estate other than home
  • Trust funds
  • CDs, stocks, bonds, mutual funds
  • Coverdell 529 college savings plans
  • Business or non-family farm equity

Defining Assets - IM not FM
  • Home equity
  • Family farm equity
  • Treated as a business
  • Farm supplement used to collect additional
  • Option to collect and/or assess retirement assets

Why Home is an IM Asset
  • Supports vertical horizontal equity
  • Homeowner gets benefits in tax system
  • Home values appreciate
  • Equity available to finance college expenses
  • Homeowners housing costs are lower than those of
    renters with comparable incomes (17 of income
    vs. 28)
  • Homeowners wealthier than renters
  • Eliminating home equity results in higher aid
    eligibility for middle/upper income families,
    potentially diverting finite resources from
    needier families

What Role Assets?
The NumbersSource 2006-07 Dependent National
Filers with Parent Contribution lt
50,000Reported Values
  • Investments 3,679,997,635
  • Home 20,360,000,000
  • Business 1,082,807,803
  • Real Estate 1,850,100,958
  • Farm 227,340,005
  • Sibling Assets 171,182,516
  • Savings 1,689,564,797
  • Total 29,060,993,714

What about Retirement?
  • Recent FASSAC research (before economic
  • Self reported retirement wealth not sufficient

Parent Assets Without Retirement
2008- 09 PROFILE filer data base
Parent Assets With Retirement
2008- 09 PROFILE filer data base
Professional Judgment Asset Issues
  • Trust funds
  • Prior educational loan repayment
  • Family home sale investments
  • Emergency expenses
  • Student assets or parent assets?

Professional Judgment Asset Issues
  • Evaluating accuracy of reported asset
  • Based on dividends, interest, capital gains
  • Requires tax return
  • Conflicting information potential if tax return
    on file
  • Consistency issue if tax return not required

Imputing Assets
  • Documentation
  • Request family list assets and related debts
  • Schedule B
  • Determine true owner of assets
  • Possible treatment
  • Determine average rate of return for investment
  • Divide investment income by rate of return
  • Remember Lower rate of return yields higher
    imputed value
  • Home value based on year of purchase and purchase
    price (IM only)

Case Study 5 - Imputing Assets
  • Dylan Bitser is a 30-year-old full-time student.
    His wife, Leah, is a full-time professional.
  • Dylan and Leahs jointly-filed tax return
    indicates two exemptions and taxable income of
    80,000, including interest income of 10,000.
    On the FAFSA, Dylan reported a total of 1,000 in
    net assets.

Protecting Assets in FM
  • Educational Savings AssetProtection Allowance
  • Protect assets for retirement
  • Based on age of parents and marital status
  • Assumes oldest parent retires at age 65 with
    average social security benefits
  • Assumes annuity purchased now will support
    moderate standard of living in retirement

Protecting Assets in IM
  • No retirement protection
  • Retirement assets not in need analysis
  • Emergency Reserve Allowance
  • Protects assets in case of income loss
  • Cumulative Education Savings Allowance
  • Assumes family has saved of income for
    college based on income and number of children
    in household

Business Asset Protection -FM and IM
  • Recognition of income-producing ability
  • Net value equity in business
  • Net value further protected according to business

Asset Assessment FM IM Differ
  • FM
  • Available assets treated as income supplement
  • Parent assets assessed up to 5.6
  • Simple Needs Test
  • Student assets - 20
  • IM
  • Assets assessed separately from income
  • Parent assets assessed 3 - 5
  • No Simple Needs Test
  • Student assets treated as parent asset

Case Study 6 Educational Debt
  • Miles and Mary Kidmore are both 60 years old.
    Miles is a carpenter and Mary is a registered
  • nurse who worked part-time while the children
    were young. Their youngest daughter, Mia, is
  • the last of six children to attend college.
    Other facts
  • They currently have a combined income of 78,000,
    including 500 in interest income.
  • Miles averages 10 months of employment per year
    and has not been able to accumulate significant
    retirement savings beyond his Social Security and
    union pension.
  • They just inherited 150,000 in mutual funds from
    Marys father.
  • Marys ability to work full-time is threatened by
    a back injury.
  • The Kidmores have financed their five oldest
    childrens college educations through a
    combination of PLUS and private loans. Although
    they have paid off their private loans, they
    still have 80,000 in outstanding PLUS debt and
    are currently paying about 800 per month on PLUS
  • Due to their health, limited retirement savings,
    and accumulated debt, they are concerned about
    their ability to pay for Mias education. They
    used the EFC calculator on the College Boards
    web site and estimated a family contribution of
    18,000 to 20,000. They are very worried that
    Mia will be unable to attend college since they
    dont believe they can take on additional debt
    and are unable to pay their contribution from
    current income.

Household Size
  • Parents student (student/students spouse)
  • Students siblings children if they will
    receive more than half support or would be
    considered dependent based on FAFSA dependency
  • Others who live with receive more than half

Number in College FM and IM
  • Contribution prorated by number of children
    enrolled in college at least half-time
  • Parent enrollment excluded
  • Parents with college students spaced 4 or more
    years apart receive no adjustment

Need Analysis More Than a Function Key
  • The financial aid administrator has
    responsibility for assessing the validity and
    reasonableness of the calculation.
  • Requires aid administrator understanding of how
    need analysis resulted in family contribution
  • Reasonable Somewhat intuitive process

Is Family Contribution Reasonable?
  • Does family contribution seem right?
  • Are results reasonable based on amounts and
    sources of familys income and assets?
  • Right means achievable over time
  • Can you justify the FC to the family?
  • FC must be viewed as multi-year effort(savings,
    income, borrowing)
  • Some family sacrifice in funding the FC is a
    reasonable expectation

Is Family Contribution Reasonable?
  • What to do if answer doesnt seem right
  • Look at ISIR edits or PROFILE edits
  • Has family explained unusual circumstances?
  • Check for errors
  • Ask colleague to review
  • If unreasonable, why? Disproportionate
    expectation from income? Assets?
  • Follow-up may be required

Professional Judgment Reality Checks
  • Is adjustment worth time and effort?
  • If contribution is already 0
  • If no funds available student at borrowing
  • If student is willing to work work-study funds
    are available
  • Just to acknowledge special circumstances

Professional Judgment Its all About People
  • Freedom to exercise professional judgment is at
    the heart of the financial aid profession
  • Freedom comes with responsibility