The Wisdom of Crowds - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

The Wisdom of Crowds

Description:

We are programmed to be collectively smart ... How do we live together? How can this work to our mutual benefit? One last thing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:263
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: INS8
Category:
Tags: crowds | live | together | we | wisdom

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Wisdom of Crowds


1
The Wisdom of Crowds
  • James Surowiecki

2
Themes
  • Groups do not need to be dominated by experts or
    unusually smart people to come up with wise
    decisions
  • Bounded rationality what seems good enough based
    on current information
  • Diversity adds to the amount of information
    available
  • Chasing the expert may be a mistake

3
More themes
  • Groups need rules to maintain order
  • Groups benefit from free communication
  • Groups need diversity
  • Best decisions come from disagreement and
    contest not consensus or compromise
  • Each member needs to be as independent as possible

4
We are programmed to be collectively smart
  • Who Wants to be a Millionaire the audience picks
    the right answer 91
  • The group tends to select the optimal answer
  • The average of group guesses is well over 90
    accurate in a long series of tests
  • Google uses this to weight the importance of
    pages on the Internet. That is why their search
    engine works so well

5
How can we leverage this insight?
  • Use decision markets to increase diversity of
    insights and generate better policies
  • Quick way of transforming diverse opinions into a
    single collective judgment
  • Stock market, voting, point spreads, futures
    contracts are other mechanisms

6
Value of diversity
  • A diverse market place allows customers to winnow
    out the best alternative solutions
  • Requires a good way to share information
  • Requires independence
  • Bees
  • Uncover all alternatives then choose among them
  • Adds new perspectives and reduces group think
  • Important in small groups and formal
    organizations
  • Lack of diversity inhibits learning

7
Why not rely on experts?
  • Intelligence is narrow and is not fungible
  • Experts are poor at calibrating their judgments
  • Knowing and knowing that you know are two
    different skills
  • Information that is counter to conventional
    wisdom is often ignored or rationalized,
    reinforcing belief that you are right

8
Leveraging Diversity
  • It is easier to buck the tide of conventional
    wisdom if you have an ally in the group even if
    they have a different rationale
  • Independence prevents correlation of mistakes and
    brings in new data

9
Impediments to Diversity
  • Learning is a social process
  • Tendency to think there is value simply because
    the group is doing it
  • It is harder to come up with an explanation about
    why you disagree
  • Risk aversion following the herd is safest
  • Information cascades can inhibit access to data
    when decisions are made sequentially
  • Can create bubbles

10
How can we become more diverse?
  • Decentralization
  • Coordination
  • Prosocial behavior

11
Decentralization
  • Decision can be based on local and specific
    knowledge
  • Encourages independence and specialization while
    still supporting information sharing and
    coordination
  • Need to ensure SHARING happens
  • Information AND judgments
  • Need way to sort through the info
  • Aggregating different opinions and indexing them
  • Goal is to be globally and collectively useful
    while still retaining specific and local character

12
Internal Markets
  • FutureMAP
  • DARPA program to allow analysts from different
    agencies to buy and sell futures contracts based
    on their expectations about what might happen in
    the Middle East
  • Policy Analysis Market attempted to provide
    intelligence on Middle East
  • Killed by Congress public also opposed
  • Replaced by Net Exchange that used info from
    general public

13
Getting people to coordinate
  • How can people voluntarily make their actions fit
    together efficiently and effectively?
  • Focal points upon which expectations can converge
  • Schelling points represent shared benefits
  • Grand Central at high noon
  • Cultural norms and conventions
  • Subway
  • Pricing of movie tickets
  • Internalized with external sanctions
  • Queue jumping
  • Spontaneous order
  • Grocery store selection

14
Role of society in cooperation
  • Impose broader definition of self interest
  • Ensure support of public goods while reducing the
    free rider effect
  • Incentive to let others do the work
  • If all are free riders, nothing gets done
  • Ensure concept of fairness and relationship
    between accomplishment and reward
  • Trading game
  • Monkeys
  • Cooperate with those we know and with strangers
  • There are benefits of being trusting and
    trustworthy
  • Allows trade to flourish
  • Internal discipline drives fair dealing
  • Government role in protecting property rights
  • Contingent consenters and taxes

15
Diversity and Traffic Jams
  • Diversity impedes coherent flow
  • To move at optimal pace, must move as a solid
    block
  • Would require like driving styles/destinations to
    be placed together
  • Standardization of flow, ingress, exit
  • Congestion pricing

16
Cooperation in science
  • Cooperation and information sharing across
    independent labs help solve the SARS mystery
    within a month
  • Specialized analytical skills plus globally
    shared results and data
  • Good on interdisciplinary problems
  • Gift economy
  • Collective wisdom of the community winnows out
    bad hypotheses meritocracy

17
Making committees work
  • Decisions of small groups ubiquitous and
    consequential
  • The influence of the people in the group on each
    others judgment is inescapable
  • More volatile and extreme
  • Possibility of making better decisions
  • Also possibility of subtracting value
  • Must have open minds
  • Must work from evidence to conclusion
  • Must gather evidence
  • Must freely discuss the evidence debate and
    minority opinions
  • Must not limit the time spent
  • Must not emphasize consensus over dissent
  • Must have leaders that encourage input from all
    and full airing of the issues within a free
    flowing discussion

18
Issues
  • Order of speaking may create a framing problem
  • Talkativeness is not equal to knowledge
  • High status people are more talkative
  • Polarization is caused by social comparison
  • Nonpolarized groups make better decisions
  • Groups must be allowed to make decisions not just
    be advisory

19
Companies and collective wisdom
  • Top down nature of organizations cause leadership
    to be isolated from other points of view
  • Principal/agent problem
  • Layers impede information flow
  • Must be honest about expectations and performance
    assessments
  • Conflict is ok
  • Pay based on output or meeting targets?
  • Incentive to seek new information
  • Silos
  • Ownership/responsibility/control
  • Internal markets

20
Democracy
  • Given enough information and the opportunity to
    consult with peers, people can understand complex
    issues and make meaningful choices
  • Americans are increasingly isolated from the
    political system, public debate is becoming
    coarser and less informative, and the idea of
    public good is being eclipsed by our worship of
    private interest

21
What is at work?
  • Motivations of voters and politicians
  • Simple fact that you voted shows you are not
    being guided by true self interest
  • There is no correlation between self interest and
    voting behavior
  • Democracy needs the constant flow of information
    it gets from votes
  • Per Schumpeter, to different individuals the
    common good is bound to mean different things
  • Dealing with fundamental cooperation and
    coordination problems
  • How do we live together?
  • How can this work to our mutual benefit?

22
One last thing
  • It doesnt matter when an individual makes a
    mistake because as long as the group is diverse
    and independent, the mistakes cancel out and you
    are left with the knowledge of the group

23
Questions???
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com