Protocol Testing of the VoIP Network - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Protocol Testing of the VoIP Network

Description:

2006-09 22 Billion Dollar Market. 98% of business/home LANs are Ethernet ... RealAudio Radio (stream) 375. 65. 421. NetMeeting Video DSL (videoconf) 791. 77. 837 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:123
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: pos64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Protocol Testing of the VoIP Network


1
Protocol Testing of the VoIP Network
August 2005
Mike Mikkelsen Business Development
Mgr. Mike.Mikkelsen_at_exfo.com
2
Protocol Testing of the VoIP Network
  • Ethernet Service Revenues
  • 2004 2.5 Billion Dollar market
  • 2005 5.0 Billion Dollar Market
  • 2006-09 22 Billion Dollar Market
  • 98 of business/home LANs are Ethernet

Source Infonetics Lightwave
3
Protocol Testing of the VoIP Network
  • Market Drivers
  • VoIP and IP Video growth
  • Bandwidth demand steadily increasing
  • Ethernet is more cost effective and scalable
  • VLAN segmentation allows for right sizing of
    circuits on a per customer basis

4
Benefits of Metro EthernetOperational Expense
Savings
  • Metro Ethernet Forum worked with 36 service
    providers to identify actual OpEx savings for
    Metro Ethernet compared to legacy Private Line,
    Frame Relay and ATM services
  • Metro Ethernet services reduced OpEx by 23.
  • Typically OpEx represents 71 of service provider
    budget
  • Savings drops right to the bottom line
  • Primary Drivers
  • Initial Provisioning 13 - 22 savings
  • Bandwidth Upgrades 66 - 83 savings

5
Protocol Testing of the VoIP Network
  • VoIP is a LAN application
  • -Businesses and Home users will experience the
    same issues
  • -VoIP Quality issues
  • -Ethernet service reliability
  • -SLA Contracts

6
Market SegmentationBandwidth Management and
Network Quality
Critical Packets
  • Real Time Imaging
  • Voice over IP
  • Fortune 100
  • Financial Enterprises
  • SLAs
  • Network Security

Carrier-Class Ethernet
Bandwidth Management
Best Effort Services
ResidentialLow Value
  • Residential Browsers
  • Non-Critical Data

Network Quality
Low Reliability
High Reliability
  • Direct Connect Architecture
  • Proactive Management
  • Service Restoration
  • Performance Monitoring
  • Facility Management

7
VoIP transport testing
  • The Trend
  • As of December 2004, Ethernet became the
    preferred enterprise data-access technology,
    surpassing ATM frame relay
  • Ethernet is attractive because it offers easy
    migration to services such as VPNs, remote data
    storage, and VoIP
  • VoIP-based PBX sales are steadily growing in
    popularity as customer confidence increases

Enterprise Telephony Services Revenue
40 growth In 2004
8
VoIP transport testing
  • The Challenge
  • Customers demand toll-quality voice services, or
    they will not migrate to VoIP
  • Operators must offer service guarantees SLAs, to
    attract customers
  • Not meeting an SLA means
  • poor customer satisfaction
  • increased maintenance spending (OpEx)
  • direct financial penalties
  • The Solution
  • Turn-up testing of the Ethernet link is required
  • Performance Testing (RFC-2544)
  • VoIP Packet Jitter
  • VoIP MOS Score

9
VoIP transport testing
  • VoIP Realities
  • Packet-switched networks were not originally
    designed to transmit voice
  • VoIP packets have to share bandwidth with other
    data services
  • FTP, remote backup, internet access, email, video
    streaming, etc.
  • Bandwidth intensive applications can choke VoIP
    traffic, resulting in poor voice quality or
    dropped calls when information is delayed or lost
  • Multi-stream scenarios should be tested during
    commissioning
  • Network parameters (VLAN priorities, IP QoS
    levels, throughput, etc.) can be adjusted by a
    network operator to provide adequate priority and
    bandwidth for VoIP packets.

10
VoIP transport testing
  • The 5 critical VoIP test parameters
  • Before turning up a VoIP service, the Ethernet
    access line should be tested for performance with
    a focus on 5 key parameters

11
VoIP transport testing
  • Troubleshooting
  • These same 5 key parameters are valuable for
    troubleshooting during or after deployment
  • Most of the parameters indicate more than one
    problem, which often occur simultaneously
  • The duration and combination of parameters points
    to different network problems, allowing
    deployment teams to quickly optimize a link.
  • Most common causes of VoIP QoS issues
  • Route flapping when a network frequently
    changes the path packets use to get to their
    final destination. This can be caused by
    congested networks or poor traffic engineering.
  • Access link congestion when VoIP packets are
    not given dedicated bandwidth or sufficient
    priority, other applications can degrade voice
    quality.
  • Backhaul congestion when bandwidth is limited
    during the aggregation of access lines this is
    often indicated by high latency and low
    throughput.

12
VoIP transport testing
  • Simulating Real Traffic Patterns
  • Test equipment must offer various ways of
    simulating real customer traffic when
    commissioning or testing a link
  • Multi-stream traffic generation measure one
    stream while varying others
  • VLAN and Flow Control replicate customer
    network parameters
  • The Skinny on MOS
  • Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a test parameter
    which is calculated from the 5 critical VoIP test
    parameters shown previously
  • MOS attempts to describe the quality of a VoIP
    call as perceived by an actual listener, and
    accounts for echo, drop-outs, fidelity, and
    listening strain
  • MOS is useful to confirm that a service has been
    commissioned properly, BUT as an aggregate
    parameter, does not offer enough info to qualify
    a link or service
  • A MOS test can pass even if an SLA is in
    violation
  • e.g. poor throughput, but good latency and packet
    jitter help to maintain call quality SLA
    penalties will be applied to the throughput
    problem

13
Protocol Testing of the VoIP Network
  • Service Providers Must be Competitive
  • - Maintain SLAs
  • - Demonstrate Ethernet service reliability
  • - Identify/Correct VoIP Quality issues fast
  • Must employ Scalable cost-effective test tools
    and practices, in order to maintain SLAs /
    customer satisfaction.

14
Test Equipment
  • Turn-up and Installation
  • Performance Testing (RFC-2544)
  • VoIP Frame Jitter (RFC-3393)
  • VoIP MOS (Mean Opinion Score)
  • Troubleshooting
  • Bit Error Rate (BER) testing
  • VoIP MOS testing
  • Service Disruption Measurements
  • Framed BER Measurements
  • Multi stream generation application across VLANs

15
Jitter for Voice
  • RFC-3393 defines how to test for Jitter.
  • Three pre-defined VoIP type frames
  • Jitter measurements should not exceed 30ms for
    acceptable VoIP

16
Jitter for Video
  • Definitions for user defined jitter testing for
    Video

Source PictureTel Managing IP Video Streaming
Bandwidth
17
Test Set Configurations Dual Test Set
  • Also known as Head to Head testing
  • Ideal for
  • End to End Testing

18
Test Set Configurations Single Port Loopback
  • One Test Set Solution
  • Port 1 TX into Port 1 RX
  • Ideal for
  • DWDM systems
  • End to End testing with end devices that can loop
    back into the same port

19
End-to-End and End-to-Core testing
Remote Testing
  • SLA Performance requirements
  • Throughput Jitter
  • Latency MOS for VoIP
  • Frame Loss

Internet
Metro Network
Gigabit Ethernet
Gigabit Ethernet
Access Network
10/100Base-T
10/100Base-T
20
Ethernet ServicesOperations, Administration and
Management
Ethernet in the First Mile
  • Ethernet Network Interface Unit
  • 802.3ah Compatible

21
IEEE 802.3ah Ethernet in the First MileEthernet
Operations, Administration and Management
  • IEEE standard out for ballot
  • Approved June 2004
  • Creates OAM sub layer in the data link
  • Operational functionality defined within
    standard
  • Remote loopbacks
  • Remote failure indications
  • Link monitoring
  • Event notification and diagnostics
  • Historical performance parameters
  • All in-band management

How can this new standard be leveraged in
emerging networks?
22
Ethernet Network Interface Unit (ENIU)
Feature Benefits Remote
troubleshooting ? Fewer truck rolls
Single-ended testing ? Restore services
faster Proactive network management ? Reduce
network downtime One-Man operation ?
Increase network availability ? Easily
integrated into existing operations
  • The Remote Ethernet Testing Solution
  • ENIUs installed at customer / network demarcation
    points
  • Test sets remotely communicates with the ENIU
  • Monitor link behavior retrieve link / customer
    usage statistics
  • Enable loopback for end-end Ethernet line
    testing
  • Remote troubleshooting SLA validation
  • Client / Provider problem sectioning/resolution
  • Commissioning new services

NOC
HeadEnd
Remote Management
Ethernet testhead modules
Router
Ethernet Testset
Ethernet Switch
Metro Network SONET/SDH/DWDM
Router
ENIU
Customer Premises
Ethernet Switch
www.adc.com
23
Ethernet Network Interface Unit (ENIU)
  • Multiple interface solutions of 10/100/1000 Mbps
  • Electrical to Optical UTP to Singlemode or
    Multimode fiber
  • Electrical to Electrical UTP to UTP
  • Optical to Optical
  • Bandwidth provisional
  • In-band loopback control
  • Loss of Power circuit cut-through
  • Local craft interface RS-232
  • Provisioning
  • Historical performance data
  • Alarm management
  • AC or DC power

Loss of signal (LOS) CRC Error Threshold Errored
Symbol Period Event Threshold Errored Frame
Event Errored Frame Event Threshold Errored Frame
Second Summary Event Threshold Over
Temperature Optical Power Threshold
www.adc.com
24
Ethernet Network Interface Unit
  • IEEE802.3ah approved in June 2004. Leverage new
    technology opportunity
  • Ethernet NIU is the next step in the
    customer-driven evolution into active Ethernet
    products
  • Proactive management of Ethernet services
  • Remote visibility of system/circuit performance
  • Single end testing
  • Reduce dispatches for troubleshooting and turn-up
  • Demarcation Interfaces E/E, E/O, O/O
  • Competitive Differentiators
  • Flexibility in network and customer interfaces
  • Scalable intelligence

25
QUESTIONS
Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com