RMBS Rating Methodology

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

RMBS Rating Methodology

Description:

twAAA. twBB. twAAA. RMBS Rating Methodology. Clementine Kiang. Oct. 16th, 2003. twAAA. twBB ... Mortgage loan and property market research ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:139
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: cleme5

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RMBS Rating Methodology


1
RMBS Rating Methodology
Clementine Kiang Oct. 16th, 2003
2
RMBS Rating Methodology
  • Mortgage loan and property market research
  • Determine market value decline under the worst
    case scenario
  • Determine expected loss and required credit
    enhancement under the worst case scenario

3
Property Review
  • Real estate historical trend
  • Research on macroeconomic factors
  • affecting housing
  • - Housing market supply and demand
  • - Economic growth
  • - Unemployment rate
  • - Mortgage interest rate

4
Costs and Risks of Residential Mortgages
  • Loan market research
  • - Residential loan market size
  • - Underwriting process
  • - Government subsidy program
  • Property transaction process and costs
  • Foreclosure process
  • Mortgage loss experience
  • Insurance

5
Credit Risk Analysis
  • What is the likelihood that an obligor will
    default or not make payments in accordance with
    the terms of the related loan agreement?
  • If the obligor does default, how much will be
    lost relative to the original amount of the loan
    with respect to the loan agreement?

6
Credit Risk
  • Why do we need to quantify credit risk?
  • To know how much credit support is required at
    particular rating categories

Required credit support
Default Frequency
Loss Severity
Expected losses
X

7
Other Risks
  • Credit risk is only one of the risks in a
    securitization structure
  • The required credit support will also size other
    risks such as commingling risk, set-off risk, and
    servicer transition risk

8
RMBS Rating Methodology-Expected Credit Loss
Assumption
  • Start with a benchmark pool
  • Determine loss severity under different rating
    levels
  • Determine default frequency under different
    rating levels
  • Adjust loss severity of the benchmark pool to
    reflect risks of the loan pools

9
Benchmark Pool
  • Pool size - minimum 300 loans
  • Loan term - 25 years
  • Max loan size - Taipei NT6 million others
    NT3.5million
  • Loan to value - maximum 70
  • Geographic dispersion (by postal code)
  • - maximum Taipei 10 others 5
  • Borrower status - salaried or professional
  • Property features - less than 10 years or in
    prime location
  • Loan record - no delinquent within the past 24
    months
  • Use of funds - purchase home no equity take-out

10
Determine Loss Severity -Market Value Decline
Assumption
  • Based on loss experience, real estate status and
    macroeconomic conditions
  • Determine the maximum market value decline in the
    worst case scenario of its rating level
  • Categorize market value decline into four
    regions Taipei city, northern Taiwan, central
    Taiwan and south Taiwan

11
Determine Loss Severity
  • Original property value
  • Market value decline
  • Auction discount
  • Selling costs
  • Legal costs
  • Accrued interest

12
Market Value Decline Assumption
  • twAAA - twBBB
  • Taipei City 30 - 18 Northern
    Taiwan 36 - 24 Central Taiwan 48 - 36
  • South Taiwan 48 - 36
  • the ratio applies the benchmark pool only

13
Loss Severity Assumption
  • twAAA - twBBB
  • Taipei City 55 - 32 Northern
    Taiwan 61 - 38 Central Taiwan 72 - 52
  • South Taiwan 72 - 52
  • the ratio is subject to change to reflect risks
    of the loan pools

14
Credit Loss Assumption
  • Default frequency x loss severity expected
    credit loss -----gt required credit support
  • Default probability twAAA - twBBB
  • 11 -
    5
  • Expected credit loss
  • twAAA
    - twBBB
  • Taipei City
    6.1 - 1.6
  • Northern Taiwan 6.7
    - 1.9
  • Central and Southern Taiwan 7.9 - 2.6
  • the ratio applies the benchmark pool only

15
RMBS Case Study
  • NT
    mil.
  • Class A twAAA 4,200
  • Class B twAA 250
  • Class C twA 150
  • Class D twBBB 125
  • Class E non-rated 275
  • 5,000

16
Transaction Features
  • Backed by NT5 billion residential mortgages
  • Floating rate mortgage using one year time
    savings deposit rates
  • Floating rate certificate using 90 day commercial
    paper rate
  • The final legal maturity date is 24 months after
    the last scheduled payment of the loan

17
Certificate Payment
  • Interest payments of senior certificates will be
    made before subordinated certificates
  • Principal payment of senior certificates will be
    made before subordinated certificates
  • When default trigger is reached, the trust will
    accelerate repayment of principal to certificate
    holders

18
Risks in the Structure
  • Interest rate risk
  • Prepayment risk
  • Commingling risk
  • Set-off risk
  • Servicer transition risk

19
Interest Rate Risk
  • Basis risk exists because interest received from
    mortgages is based on one year savings deposit
    rate but interest paid to certificate holders is
    based on 90 day commercial paper rate
  • Interest spike on savings deposit rate and
    commercial paper rate are simulated and tested in
    the cash flow analysis to ensure timely and full
    payment of interest and principal
  • Basis risk can be mitigated through swap

20
Prepayment Risk
  • Prepayment is not a credit risk. The likelihood
    of default is reduced if the borrower prepays
  • If the borrower prepays, accrued interest on
    loans will be paid only up to the repayment date
  • Interest received in the trust will be less than
    expected leading to insufficient funds to meet
    payment obligations to certificate holders
  • The cash flow models simulate different
    prepayment assumptions to see impact on the cash
    flow

21
Commingling Risk
  • The servicer will remit monies collected to the
    trust one day after monies are received
  • Commingling risk occurs if the servicer is
    insolvent and the monies belonging to the trust
    are not remitted to the trust
  • Commingling risk is mitigated either by setting
    aside a reserve or by increasing the issuance
    weighting of the most junior class certificate to
    absorb losses

22
Set-off Risk
  • If the originator is insolvent, borrowers can
    set-off their deposits against their loans with
    the originator if such deposits exist prior to
    the closing of the securitization transaction
  • Set-off risk is sized according to obligors
    deposit amount as of the closing date
  • No set-off risk will be sized if obligors do not
    have deposits with the originator before closing

23
Servicer Transition Risks
  • If the master servicer is not able to perform its
    duties, the rights and obligations of the master
    servicer will be terminated
  • The back-up servicer will assume the obligations
    and duties of the master servicer
  • Servicer transition risks exist during the
    transition period
  • Certificate interest and senior fees are sized
    and kept as liquidity reserve during the life of
    the transaction

24
Other Considerations
  • True sale
  • SPT bankruptcy remoteness
  • Transfer of properties to the trust
  • Foreclosure of properties
  • Tax ruling/tax opinions

25
What Ratings Do Not Address
  • The early maturity of the certificates due to
    prepayment
  • Total return of the certificates
  • Likelihood of downgrade
  • Fraud and mistakes on the part of the issuer
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)