L19 Plastic Anisotropy: Relaxed Constraints, Theoretical Textures

1
L19 Plastic AnisotropyRelaxed Constraints,
Theoretical Textures

• 27-750, Advanced Characterization and
  Microstructural Analysis
• A. D. Rollett
• Spring 2008

2
Objective

• The objective of this lecture is to complete the
  description of plastic anisotropy.
• Vectorization of stress and strain
• Definition of Taylor factor
• Comparison of single with multiple slip
• Description of Relaxed Constraints

3
Vectorization of stress, strain

• The lack of dependence on hydrostatic stress and
  volume constancy permits a different
  vectorization to be used (cf. matrix notation for
  anisotropic elasticity). The following set of
  basis tensors provides a systematic approach.
  The first tensor, b(1) represents deviatoric
  tension on Z, second plane strain compression in
  the Z plane, and the second row are the three
  simple shears in the XYZ system. The first two
  tensors provide a basis for the p-plane.

4
Vectorization 2
The components of the vectorized stresses and
strains are then contractions (projections)with
the basis tensors sl sb(l), el eb(l)
5
Vectorization 3

• This preserves work conjugacy, i.e. se
  Sslel. The Lequeu vectorization scheme was almost
  the same as this but with the first two
  components interchanged. It is also useful to see
  the vector forms in terms of the regular tensor
  components.

6
Maximum work, summary

• The sum of the shears for the actual set of
  active systems is less than any hypothetical set
  (Taylors hypothesis). This also shows that we
  have obtained an upper bound on the stress
  required to deform the crystal because we have
  approached the solution for the work rate from
  above any hypothetical solution results in a
  larger work rate than the actual solution.

7
Taylor factor, M

• We can take ratios of stresses, or strains to
  define the Taylor factor, M if a simple choice
  of deformation axes is made, such as uniaxial
  tension, then the indices can be dropped to
  obtain the typical form of the equation, s
  ltMgttcrss. The magnitude of M is obtained by
  summing over the (inverse) Schmid factors of each
  slip system. For the polycrystal, the arithmetic
  mean of the Taylor factors is typically used to
  represent the ratio between the macroscopic flow
  stress and the critical resolved shear stress.
  This relies on the assumption that weak (low
  Taylor factor) grains cannot deform much until
  the harder ones are also deforming plastically,
  and that the harder (high Taylor factor) grains
  are made to deform by a combination of stress
  concentration and work hardening around them.

8
Taylor factor, multiaxial stress

• For multiaxial stress states, one may use the
  effective stress, e.g. the von Mises stress
  (defined in terms of the stress deviator tensor,
  Ss-(sii/3), and also known as effective stress).
  Note that the equation below provides the most
  self-consistent approach for calculating the
  Taylor factor for multi-axial deformation.

9
Taylor factor, multiaxial strain

• Similarly for the strain increment (where dep is
  the plastic strain increment which has zero
  trace, i.e. deii0).

Compare with single slip Schmid factor
cosfcosl t/s
10
Uniaxial compression/tension

• So, for axisymmetric straining paths, the
  orientation dependence within a Standard
  Stereographic Triangle (SST) is as follows. The
  velocity gradient has the form

The von Mises equivalent strain for such a
tensile strain is always 2??
11
Taylor factor(orientation)
Hosford mechanics of xtals...
12
Texture hardening

• Note that the Taylor factor is largest at both
  the 111 and 110 positions and a minimum at the
  100 position. Thus a cubic material with a
  perfect lt111gt or lt110gt fiber will be 1.5 times as
  strong in tension or compression as the same
  material with a lt100gt fiber texture. This is not
  as dramatic a strengthening as can be achieved by
  other means, e.g. precipitation hardening, but it
  is significant. Also, it can be achieved without
  sacrificing other properties.

13
Uniaxial deformation single slip

• Recall the standard picture of the single crystal
  under tensile load. In this case, we can define
  angles between the tensile direction and the slip
  plane normal, f, and also between the tensile
  direction and the slip direction, l. Given an
  applied tensile stress (force over area) on the
  crystal, we can calculate the shear stress
  resolved onto the particular slip system as
  tscosfcosl. This simple formula (think of using
  only the direction cosine for the slip plane and
  direction that corresponds to the tensile axis)
  then allows us to rationalize the variation of
  stress with testing angle (crystal orientation)
  with Schmid's Law concerning the existence of a
  critical resolved shear stress.

14
Single slip Schmid factors

• Re-write the relationship in terms of (unit)
  vectors that describe the slip plane, n, and slip
  direction, b index notation and tensor notation
  are used interchangeably.

15
Single multiple comparison

• It is interesting to consider the difference
  between multiple slip and single slip stress
  levels because of its relevance to deviations
  from the Taylor model. Hosford presents an
  analysis of the ratio between the stress required
  for multiple slip and the stress for single slip
  under axisymmetric deformation conditions (in
  111lt110gt slip).

16
Single Multiple comparison
Max. difference (1.65)between single
multiple slip
Figure 6.2 from Ch. 6 of Hosford, showing the
ratio of the Taylor factor to the reciprocal
Schmid factor, M/(1/m), for axisymmetric flow
with 111lt110gt slip. Orientations near 110
exhibit the largest ratios and might therefore be
expected to deviate most readily from the Taylor
model.
17
Single Multiple comparison

• The result expressed as a ratio of the Taylor
  factor to the reciprocal Schmid factor is that
  orientations near 100 or 111 exhibit negligible
  differences whereas orientations near 110 exhibit
  the largest differences. This suggests that the
  latter orientations are the ones that would be
  expected to deviate most readily from the Taylor
  model. In wire drawing of bcc metals, this is
  observed the grains tend to deform in plane
  strain into flat ribbons. The flat ribbons then
  curl around each other in order to maintain
  compatibility.

W. F. Hosford, Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 230
(1964), pp. 12.
18
Plane Strain Compression

• So, for plane strain straining paths, the
  velocity gradient has the form

The von Mises equivalent strain for such a
tensile strain is always ??v???????????? Note
that this value leads to different results for
the Taylor factor, compared to examples in, e.g.,
Reid and in Bunge (but is consistent with the
definitions in the Lapp code).
19
Relaxed Constraints

• An important modification of the Taylor model is
  the Relaxed Constraints (RC) model. It is
  important because it improves the agreement
  between experimental and calculated textures.
  The model is based on the development of large
  aspect ratios in grain shape with increasing
  strain. It makes the assumption that certain
  components of shear strain generate displacements
  in volumes that are small enough that they can be
  neglected. Thus any shear strain developed
  parallel to the short direction in an elongated
  grain (e.g. in rolling) produces a negligible
  volume of overlapping material with a neighboring
  grain.

20
Relaxed Constraints, contd.

• In the case of rolling, both the e13 and the e23
  shears produce negligible compatibility problems
  at the periphery of the grain. Thus the RC model
  is a relaxation of the strict enforcement of
  compatibility inherent in the Taylor model.

21
Relaxed Constraints, contd.

• Full constraints vs. Relaxed constraints

22
RC model (rate sensitive)

• With only 3 boundary conditions on the strain
  rate, the same equation must be satisfied but
  over fewer components.
• Note the Bishop-Hill maximum work method can
  still be applied to find the operative stress
  state one uses the 3-fold vertices instead of
  the 6- and 8-fold vertices of the single crystal
  yield surface.

23
Relaxed Constraints

• Despite the crude nature of the RC model,
  experience shows that it results in superior
  prediction of texture development in both rolling
  and torsion.
• It is only an approximation! Better models, such
  as the self-consistent model (and finite-element
  models) account for grain shape more accurately.

24
Effect of RC on texture development

• In (fcc) rolling, the stable orientation
  approaches the Copper instead of the
  Taylor/Dillamore position.

25
Summary

• Vectorization of stress, strain tensors.
• Definition, explanation of the Taylor factor.
• Comparison of single and multiple slip.