TAKING ON TOO MUCH WATER - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

TAKING ON TOO MUCH WATER

Description:

TAKING ON TOO MUCH WATER. Making Sure Control and Management of Costs ... BERMUDA TRIANGLE DAMAGES SPECULATIVE OR REAL? Pushing the envelope into speculation. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: morys
Category:
Tags: much | taking | too | water | bermuda | triangle

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TAKING ON TOO MUCH WATER


1
TAKING ON TOO MUCH WATER
American Bar Association Forum on the
Construction Industry
2007 Fall Meeting
  • Making Sure Control and Management of Costs
    Provide the Survival Kit
  • of Sound Evidence When Needed

John E. Bulman, Esq. Little Medeiros Kinder
Bulman Whitney Providence, RI
Patrick A. McGeehin, CPA Rubino McGeehin
Bethesda, MD
2
  • We all have the strength to bear the misfortunes
    of others.
  • Francois de la Rochefoucauld, 1613-1680

3
FUNDAMENTAL TENET
  • Non-breaching party entitled to be put in
    position it would have been absent the breach.

4
FUNDAMENTAL CAVEAT NUMBER 1
  • Non-breaching party only entitled to damages
    reasonably in the contemplation of the parties at
    the time of contracting.

FUNDAMENTAL CAVEAT NUMBER 2
Any award of damages must be reduced by the
savings obtained by the contractor as a result of
the breach (i.e., any cost or loss that he has
avoided by not having to perform).
FUNDAMENTAL CAVEAT NUMBER 3
Contractor must establish damages to a
reasonable certainty.
5
SLAM DUNK ON ENTITLEMENT ? GOOD RESULT IN
ARBITRATION
6
HOW DOES THE DAMAGES SHIP VEER OFF COURSE?
7
IT MIGHT COST TOO MUCH TO MAKE THE SHIP AS GOOD
AS YOU PLANNED.
  • Dangerously assuming that repair and replacement
    costs will be awarded instead of diminution in
    value economic waste doctrine.

8
CAUSATION AND DAMAGES MIGHT BE LIKE TWO SHIPS
PASSING IN THE NIGHT.
  • Failing to prove that the damages incurred bear
    sufficient relationship to the breaches claimed.

9
IN A MULTIPLE SHIP COLLISION, WHICH SHIP CAUSED
WHAT DAMAGES?
  • Failure to properly allocate damages where there
    are several potential contributing parties.

10
BERMUDA TRIANGLE DAMAGES SPECULATIVE OR REAL?
  • Pushing the envelope into speculation.

11
  • PROJECT COST AND FIELD RECORDS GENERAL
    CONSIDERATIONS
  • Cost to maintain records
  • Company policy issues
  • Establishing detailed cost and productivity
    tracking at the outset of the project
  • Growing from smaller to larger projects
  • Availability of technology to support tracking

12
  • DELAY AND IMPACT ISSUES
  • Problem arises keep good records
  • Extra work vs. impact and inefficiency and
    acceleration costs
  • Job-specific vs. industry wide data
  • Technology leading to need for higher level of
    tracking and proof

13
  • DAMAGES THEORIES METHODOLOGIES
  • Total Cost Approach
  • Jury Verdict Approach
  • Modified Total Cost Approach
  • Use of Inefficiency Percentages from
    Published Sources
  • Expert estimates of inefficiency
  • Measured Mile

14
  • Measured Mile Approach
  • Most preferred method
  • Productivity during abnormally disrupted period
    minus productivity during normal period of work
  • Deduct losses resulting from disruptions which
    are not compensable (e.g. weather or contractor
    performance issues)

15
  • Measured Mile Approach
  • (continued)
  • Difficulty in finding period of un-impacted
    performance
  • Comparability of the work

16
  • Considerations for Tracking Cost and Productivity
    Data
  • Physical location of the work
  • Type of work and sub-categories
  • Timing of the performance of work

17
  • Considerations for Tracking Cost and Productivity
    Data (continued)
  • Perceived differential in the impact on varied
    sub-categories of work
  • Degree of difficulty comparison
  • Materiality of the work in each area
  • Cost to accumulate the costs and productivity in
    question

18
Types of Records and Other Issues
  • Timesheets
  • Equipment logs
  • Diaries
  • Productivity data (equivalent units per shift)

19
Types of Records and Other Issues (continued)
  • Project personnel instructions
  • Uniqueness of each project situation
  • Actual examples of successful/unsuccessful
    attempts
  • to prove inefficiencies

20
Boston Big Dig Construction Project
  • Impact claims for concrete operations
  • No un-impacted period
  • Measured Mile calculation
  • Analysis based on time only -- no sub- elements
    tracked (e.g. forming, placing,
  • finish, etc. (no tracking by pour)
  • Point and patch issues quality and timing

21
Boston Big Dig Construction Project
22
Boston Big Dig Construction Project
23
Overseas Embassy Construction Project
  • - Inefficiency claim
  • - Inappropriate approach
  • - Rejected by BCA Judge

24
Overseas Embassy Construction Project
25
Remediation of Landfill
  • - Termination of subcontractor
  • - Second set of books craft labor
    database
  • - Self performed vs. brokered job
  • - Use of consultant to do re-coding
  • - Costly and inefficient approach

26
Highway Bridge Construction
  • Subcontractor fabrication and
    inefficiencies
  • - No cost segregation by Pier and Bridge

27
Highway Bridge Construction
28
Boston Big Dig Construction Project
  • - Impact claims for concrete
  • operations
  • - Degree of difficulty comparison
  • - Costs/productivity by structure

29
Boston Big Dig Construction Project
30
Boston Big Dig Construction Project
31
Boston Big Dig Construction Project
32
Boston Big Dig Construction Project
33
SOME BASIC POINTERS FOR LIFE ON THE HIGH SEAS
  • Help your clients develop systems that collect
    damages evidence in a coherent fashion.
  • Try to use the best accepted damages theory.
  • Always remember causation.
  • Give the fact finder the necessary tools to
    perform allocation and diminution of value
    assessments.
  • Common sense should prevail.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com