Submission by Community Law Centre UWC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Submission by Community Law Centre UWC

Description:

... may adopt their own definition (conflict resolved in terms of 146 Constitution) ... S 73 Intervention conflict with s 139 Constitution ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: pmg8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Submission by Community Law Centre UWC


1
Land Use Management Bill
  • Submission by Community Law Centre (UWC)
  • Prof Jaap de Visser
  • Leah Cohen

2
  • Essential role of LUMB
  • Clarification of national, provincial and
    municipal roles
  • Rationalisation of laws on land use management
  • Focus of submission constitutional roles and
    responsibilities

3
Difficulty overlapping responsibilities
  • Constitution produces two types of overlap
  • Overlap between functions in Schedules
  • Supervisory overlap wrto local government

4
Overlap between functions
  • Four functions on land use
  • Schedule 4B Municipal Planning
  • Schedule 5A Provincial Planning
  • Schedule 4A Regional Planning and Development,
    Urban and Rural Development
  • Ancillary functions
  • Schedule 4A Housing, Environment etc.

5
Supervisory overlap
  • Schedules 4B matters are local government
    matters
  • But they are also provincial/national matters to
    a limited extent
  • Nat/prov can legislate a framework for municipal
    planning
  • Not detail

6
  • Clarity on roles through definitions
  • Municipal Planning vs Provincial Planning
    not intended to be self-explanatory

7
How to get clarity on roles?
  • Let courts pronounce
  • Courts are reluctant
  • Conflict-driven solution
  • Judgments limited to case at hand
  • Administrative definitions
  • Public scrutiny?

8
  • Legislative definitions
  • Parliament best placed to define functions of
    Schedule 4
  • Broad policy process
  • Public scrutiny
  • If Parliament does not define Schedule 4
    functions ? provinces have concurrent power and
    may adopt their own definition (conflict resolved
    in terms of 146 Constitution)

9
  • Definition of Municipal Planning is most needed
  • Subject to intersection by two spheres ito
    functional overlap
  • Additional intersection by supervision
  • Guidance from existing judicial and
    administrative definitions

10
Constitutional Court
  • Territorial principle
  • Functional principle what is appropriate to each
    sphere
  • Appropriate to local government
  • Developmental local government
  • Control over local spaces/the built-environment

11
Municipal Demarcation Boards definition of
Municipal Planning
  • Integrated Development Planning
  • (district) IDP framework and
  • (local) Development and implementation of a town
    planning scheme or land use management scheme for
    the municipality including administration of
    development applications in terms of special
    consents and rezonings.

12
District/local division
  • Bill both district and local adopt land use
    schemes, district decides cross-boundary
    applications within district
  • Inconsistent with division of powers between
    district and local in terms of Municipal
    Structures Act
  • S 84(1)(a) district adopts IDP and IDP framework
    for district
  • rest of the Municipal Planning function remains
    with local municipality (s 84(2))

13
  • District/local tension is key pressure point in
    system of local government
  • Two tier system is under review ito Policy Review
    of Provincial and Local Government

14
S 36 Jurisdiction of Land Use Regulators
  • S 36(c)(i) and(ii) are cumulative
  • (cross-boundary AND provincial interest)
  • who decides cross-boundary applications where no
    provincial interest is involved?

15
S 36 Jurisdiction of Land Use Regulators
  • provincial interest
  • Linked to PGDS ? legally
  • undefined policy instrument
  • amongst other things
  • or similar instruments
  • Rather give specific content to provincial
    function Regional planning and development,
    Environment etc.

Blank cheque for provinces to determine their
involvement
16
  • No voice for municipalities affected by
    cross-boundary application
  • (Same status as affected citizens)
  • Similar arguments for definition of national
    interest

17
S 73 Intervention conflict with s 139
Constitution
  • S 139 national executive may intervene only-
  • if provincial executive fails
  • AND
  • municipal failure relates to specific financial
    interventions
  • Bill after consulting provincial government and
    in the public interest
  • Bill failure in terms of this Act or in
    housing matters

18
  • Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com