Nutrition Monitoring and Surveillance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Nutrition Monitoring and Surveillance

Description:

pregnancy, lactation, nursing status, height and weight. income, poverty status, household size, ... III Anthropometric Procedures Video. Body weight. Standing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:4280
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 88
Provided by: donnaj3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nutrition Monitoring and Surveillance


1
Nutrition Monitoring and Surveillance
2
Some Definitions
  • Joint Nutrition Monitoring Evaluation Committee,
    1986
  • Expert Panel on Nutrition Monitoring, 1989

3
Nutrition Monitoring
  • Assessment of dietary or nutrition status at
    intermittent times with the aim of detecting
    changes in the dietary or nutritional status of a
    population

4
Nutrition Surveillance
  • Continuous assessment of nutritional status for
    the purpose of detecting changes in trend or
    distribution in order to initiate corrective
    measures

5
Dietary Status
  • The condition of a populations or an
    individuals intake of foods and food components,
    especially nutrients.

6
Nutrition Assessment
  • Measurement of indicators of dietary status and
    nutrition related health status to identify the
    possible occurrence, nature, and extent of
    impaired nutritional status.

7
Nutrition Monitoring in the United States
8
Chronology
9
(No Transcript)
10
Goals of NNMS
  • Provide foundations for improvement of
    nutritional status and quality and healthfulness
    of food supply
  • Collect, analyze, and disseminate timely data on
    nutrition and dietary status, quality of food
    supply, food consumption patterns, consumer
    knowledge and attitudes

11
NNMS Goals, cont...
  • ID high risk groups and geographic areas and
    trends
  • Establish national baseline data and develop
    standards for monitoring
  • Provide data for evaluating implications of
    changes in agricultural policy

12
National Nutrition Monitoring System
  • Jointly administered by USDA and DHHS
  • 22 federal agencies involved
  • Over 70 surveys and surveillance activities
  • Ten year comprehensive plan for Nutrition
    Monitoring and Related Research sent to congress
    in 1993

13
NNMS - Some Agencies
  • USDA
  • Food and Nutrition Service
  • Food Safety and Inspection Service
  • Agricultural Research Service
  • Economic Research Service
  • Extension Service
  • Cooperative State Research Service

14
  • Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Center for Health Statistics
  • CDC-National Center for Chronic Disease
    Prevention and Health Promotion
  • Food and Drug Administration
  • Heath Resources and Services Administration
  • Indian Health Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
    Administration

15
  • Others
  • Department of Defense
  • Department of Education
  • Agency for International Development
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Census Bureau
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • National Marine Fisheries Service

16
5 Areas of NNMS
  • Nutrition and related health measurements
  • Food and nutrient composition
  • Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
  • Food composition and nutrient databases
  • Food Supply Determinations

17
(No Transcript)
18
Nutrition and Related Health Measurements
  • National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys
    (I-V, and continuous)
  • National Health Interview Survey
  • National Hospital Discharge Survey
  • Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System

19
Food and Nutrient Composition
  • Nationwide Food Consumption Survey
  • Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals

20
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior
  • Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
  • Youth Risk Behavior Survey
  • Diet and Health Knowledge Survey

21
Food Composition and Nutrient Data Bases
  • National Nutrient Data Bank (NNDB)

22
Food Supply Determinations
  • US Food and Nutrition Supply Series

23
Third Report on Nutrition Monitoring in the
United States - December 1995
24
  • Increase in rates of overweight and sedentary
    lifestyle
  • Increase in proportion of adults with desirable
    serum total cholesterol
  • Hypertension remains major public health problem
    - especially in non-Hispanic blacks
  • 9-13 of low income households experience food
    insecurity
  • Rates of femoral osteoporosis in females gt 50
    years old
  • 21 in non-Hispanic whites
  • 10 in non-Hispanic blacks
  • 16 in Mexican Americans

25
  • Intakes of of diet from total fat, saturated
    fatty acids, and cholesterol have decreased, but
    remain above recommended levels for large
    proportion of the population
  • Mean calcium intakes are below recommendations -
    especially in adolescents, adult females,
    elderly, and non-Hispanic black males
  • Median iron intakes below recommendations for
    children 1-2, female adolescents, females 20-59
  • Average daily intake of fruits and vegetables is
    about 4 servings

26
Nutrition Monitoring in theUnited StatesThe
Directory of Federal and State NutritionMonitorin
g and Related Research Activities2000
An Inventory of Resources
27
Major Surveys with Nutrition Content
28
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
  • CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease
    Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP)
  • Annually since 1984 (not all states at first)
  • Telephone interview
  • Data collection is conducted separately by each
    State. Sample design uses State-level,
    random-digit-dialed probability samples of the
    adult (aged 18 years and over) population.
  • State-specific sample sizes ranged from 1,499 to
    6,005

29
BRFSS - Questions
  • Behavioral risk factors (for example, alcohol and
    tobacco use), preventive health measures,
    HIV/AIDS, health status, limitation of activity,
    and health care access and utilization
  • Core of questions asked in all States
  • Standardized optional questions on selected
    topics administered at the States discretion
  • Rotating core of questions asked every other year
    in all States
  • State-added questions developed to address
    State-specific needs

30
BRFSS - Data
  • National
  • State
  • Smaller units when local agencies pay for
    additional surveys
  • Data system homepage http//www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/b
    rfss

31
BRFSS - Nutrition
  • Self reported height and weight
  • Trying to loose weight?
  • 6 fruit and vegetable intake questions
  • Activity
  • Food security

32
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS)
  • CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease
    Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP)
  • School based, grades 9-12
  • National survey is done in 150 schools, states
    and local districts conduct their own surveys
  • Other components national alternative school
    survey, middle school surveys in selected States,
    and the National College Health Risk Behavior
    Survey
  • Anonymous self-administered questionnaires
  • Biennial (odd-numbered years)
  • 1999 national survey, N 15,349

33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
YRBS - Data
  • Gender, age, grade, race/ethnicity, urbanicity of
    school
  • National and 4 census regions
  • By state for 41 states in 1999
  • 16 large metropolitan school districts
  • http//www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash/yrbs/ov.htm

36
YRBS - Categories
  • injury
  • tobacco use
  • alcohol and other drug use
  • sexual behavior
  • diet and nutrition
  • physical activity

37
YRBS - Nutrition
  • Self reported weight and height
  • Dieting behaviors
  • Eating disorder behaviors
  • Fruit and vegetable intake
  • Fat intake

38
Seattle YRBS
1993 1999
Percentage of students who were trying to lose weight 34.4 38.3
Percentage of students who exercised or participated in physical activities for at least 20 minutes that made them sweat and breathe hard on three or more of the past seven days 64.4 64.1
39
Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals
(CSFII)
  • USDA
  • 1994-1996
  • in-person interviews
  • 24-hour dietary recall 2 nonconsecutive days of
    food intake data collected 3-10 days apart
  • 2 weeks later, one adult from each household
    asked questions about knowledge and attitudes
    toward dietary guidance, health, and use of food
    labels.

40
CFSII - Sample
  • Nationally representative stratified multistage
    area probability sample of U.S.
    noninstitutionalized civilian population, all
    ages.
  • Oversampling of low-income households
  • For 199496, sample size for 1-day dietary data
    was 16,103 for 2-day dietary data, it was
    15,303.

41
CFSII - Data
  • kinds and amounts of foods consumed
  • sources of foods
  • time, name of each eating occasion
  • food expenditures, shopping practices
  • pregnancy, lactation, nursing status,
  • height and weight
  • income, poverty status, household size,
  • participation in Food Stamp and WIC programs

42
CFSII - Data Availability
  • National four U.S. Census Bureau regions
    Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas
  • http//www.barc.usda.gov/bhnrc/foodsurvey/home.htm

43
CFSII - Nutrition
  • food intakes in grams of 71 USDA-defined food
    groups and subgroups
  • nutrient intakes of 28 nutrients and food
    components
  • nutrient intakes expressed as percentages of the
    1989 Recommended Dietary Allowance
  • Pyramid servings from 30 food groups

44
Cleveland et al. Dietary Intake of Whole Grains.
J Am Coll Nutr. 2002.
45
Enns et al. Family Economics and Nutrition
Review, 1997.
46
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES)
  • CDC, National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)
  • In-person interview in household and mobile
    examination center
  • stratified multistage probability sample,
    nationally representative of the U.S. civilian
    noninstitutionalized population
  • Approximately 5,000 people are examined at 15
    locations each year
  • All ages beginning in 1999

47
NHANES - Continuous
  • Periodic (196094)
  • annual beginning in 1999
  • after 1999 annual sample size will be too small
    to provide reliable estimates for many measures
    and for most subgroups. Most analyses will
    require 3 years of data for reliable estimates.

48
http//www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/mectour
.htm
49
(No Transcript)
50
NHANES - Content
  • Chronic disease prevalence and conditions
    (including undiagnosed conditions
  • immunization status
  • infectious disease prevalence
  • health insurance
  • measures of environmental exposures
  • hearing
  • vision
  • mental health

51
NHANES - Content
  • anemia
  • diabetes
  • cardiovascular disease
  • osteoporosis
  • obesity
  • oral health
  • physical fitness

52
NHANES - New in 1999
  • cardiorespiratory fitness
  • physical functioning
  • lower extremity disease
  • full body DXA for body fat as well as bone
    density
  • tuberculosis

53
NHANES - Data
  • National four U.S. Census Bureau regions
  • Demographics Gender, age, education,
    race/ethnicity, place of birth, income,
    occupation, and industry
  • http//www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm

54
NHANES - Nutrition
  • Food Security
  • Dietary supplements
  • Weight history
  • Dietary Recall - one 24 hour

55
NHANES III Anthropometric Procedures Video
  • Body weight
  • Standing height
  • Sitting height
  • Upper leg length
  • Recumbent length
  • Upper arm length
  • Knee height
  • Arm circumference
  • Waist circumference
  • Buttocks circumference
  • Thigh circumference
  • Head circumference
  • Skinfolds (including thighs, triceps,
    subscapular, and suprailiac)
  • Wrist breadth
  • Elbow breadth

56
(No Transcript)
57
NHANES-CFSII Integration
  • Staged integration of two surveys underway
  • 2001 a year of testing, 2002 full integration
  • Goals continuous data collection, linkage of
    diet and health data, 2 days of dietary data
    collection (second day by phone 3 to 10 days
    after initial exam)
  • DHKS not part of integrated efforts at this
    time, but under consideration

58
Diet and Health Knowledge Survey (DHKS)
  • USDA, Agricultural Research Service
  • Periodically from 1989 to 1996
  • In conjunction with CSFII
  • Sample size per year
  • 1300 from 1989 through 1991
  • 2000 per year 1994-1996
  • telephone follow up conducted with one adult in
    each household 2-3 weeks after CFSII

59
DHKS - Content
  • Designed to assess relationships between
    knowledge and attitudes about dietary guidance
    and food safety, food choice decisions and
    nutrient intakes
  • Variables can be linked to CFSII variables for
    individuals.

60
DHKS - Questions
  • Self perceived intake levels
  • awareness of diet/health relationships
  • use of food labels
  • perceived importance of following dietary
    guidance for specific nutrients and food
    components
  • beliefs about food safety
  • Knowledge about food sources of nutrients

61
DHKS - Descriptive Variables
  • Individual gender, age, ethnicity, education,
    employment status, height and weight
  • Household income, size, cash assets, region,
    urbanization, tenancy, participation in food
    stamps and WIC

62
DHKS - URL
  • www.barc.usda.gov/bhnrc/foodsurvey/csfii94.htm

63
Optimists rate diet quality as better than
actually is Pessimists rate diet quality as
worse than it is
http//www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/DietAndHealth/hea
lthfuldiet.htm
64
(No Transcript)
65
Household Food Security in the United States,
2001 Food Assistance and Nutrition Research
Report 29 Economic Research Service U.S.
Department of Agriculture November 2002
66
  • 89.3 percent of U.S. households were food secure
    throughout the entire calendar year 2001.
  • 10.7 percent of U.S. households were food
    insecure at some time during the year.
  • In 3.3 percent of households people were hungry
    at times during the year because they couldnt
    afford enough food.
  • Rates of food insecurity and hunger in the U.S.
    increased during the 2-year period 1999-2001.

67
Nutrition Security
  • The provision of an environment that encourages
    and motivates society to make food choices
    consistent with short and long term good health.

68
Food Security
  • Assess by all people at all times to sufficient
    food for an active and healthy life. Food
    security includes at a minimum the ready
    availability of nutritionally adequate and safe
    foods, and an assured ability to acquire
    acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways.

69
Food Insecurity
  • a household had limited or uncertain availability
    of food, or limited or uncertain ability to
    acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable
    ways (i.e., without resorting to emergency food
    supplies, scavenging, stealing, or other unusual
    coping strategies).

70
Hunger
  • The uneasy or painful sensation caused by a lack
    of food.
  • Involuntary hunger that results from not being
    able to afford enough food
  • The recurrent and involuntary lack of access to
    food
  • May produce malnutrition over time.

71
History of the Food Security Measurement Project
1990 NMRR Act recommends a standardized mechanism for defining and obtaining data on the prevalence of food insecurity
1992 USDA staff review existing research
1994 USDA and DHHS sponsor conference on Food Security Measurement and Research
1995 Current Population Survey of US Census Bureau includes Food Security Measurement scale
1996-present Annual Surveys, ERS assumes leadership, others encouraged to use FSMS
72
(No Transcript)
73
(No Transcript)
74
(No Transcript)
75
Washington State, 1999-2001
  • Food Insecure without hunger 12.5
  • Food Insecure with hunger 4.6

76
Prevalence
  • The West and South Census Regions registered
    somewhat higher prevalences than did the
    Northeast and Midwest.
  • Food insecurity and hunger were more prevalent in
    central cities and in nonmetropolitan areas than
    in suburban areas.

77
(No Transcript)
78
(No Transcript)
79
(No Transcript)
80
(No Transcript)
81
(No Transcript)
82
Update with 2003 data
83
2003 National Results
  • Food Insecurity 11.2
  • (increased from 11.1)
  • Food Insecurity with hunger 3.5
  • No change from 2002

84
Food Insecurity with Hunger
85
Food Insecure Numbers in Washington
Year Numbers of Households
2002 290,000
2003 275,000

86
Why did Washingtons rates improve?
  • Increased participation in federal programs
  • Between 2001 and 2004 there was a 59 increase in
    food stamp participation.
  • Improving economy?

87
Other National Findings
  • 70 of food insecure families had visited a food
    pantry within the past year.
  • Only 18.3 of families with incomes below 130
    had participated in food stamps in the past month.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com