WP2: Report

1
Kaunas CECA Parterns Meeting
WP2 Report 29th June 2006
Dr Ing Jonathan C. Borg
2
Presentation Outline

• Introduction to WP2
• Survey Approach
• Survey Analysis
• Conclusions

3
WP2 MAIN Objectives

• To optimally define and select the
  instruments/methods (eg e-Learning vs
  face-to-face vs combination) to prepare and
  deliver the ECDL CAD training material
• To identify and select suitable ECDL CAD
  candidate testing methods.

4
Presentation Outline

• Introduction
• Survey Approach
• Survey Analysis
• Conclusions

5
Survey Approach

• To effectively achieve the above main objectives
  of this WP, as agreed in the Bucharest (March
  2006) kick-off meeting, a relevant questionnaire
  was drafted by the leading partner P5 (Malta) and
  the circulated for feedback to all CECA partners.

6
Survey

• Following feedback by the partners, the final
  version was approved by the coordinator and
  re-distributed amongst all partners for sample
  surveys with relevant CAD stakeholders in their
  region.

7
Presentation Outline

• Introduction
• Survey Approach
• Survey Analysis
• Conclusions

8
Survey Participants (1)
Replies By Country
9
Survey Participants (2)
Replies By Gender
10
Survey Participants (3)
Age
By Country
11
Survey Participants (4)
Age
Overall
12
Survey Participants (5)
Educational Status
By Country
13
Survey Participants (6)
Educational Status
Overall
14
Survey Participants (7)
Experience in Technical Drawing
By Country
Years
15
Survey Participants (8)
Experience in Technical Drawing
Overall
16
Quest. 6
Would you Be Willing to obtain ECDL Certification
in the next 3 years ?
By Country
17
Quest. 6
Would you Be Willing to obtain ECDL Certification
in the next 3 years ?
By Gender
18
Quest. 6
Would you Be Willing to obtain ECDL Certification
in the next 3 years ?
Overall
19
Quest. 7
Assuming that a good e-learning course for an
ECDL CAD is developed, would you be willing using
it?
By Country
20
Quest. 7
Assuming that a good e-learning course for an
ECDL CAD is developed, would you be willing using
it?
By Gender
21
Quest. 7
Assuming that a good e-learning course for an
ECDL CAD is developed, would you be willing using
it?
Overall
22
Quest. 8
For an e-learning ECDL CAD course, HOW would you
like to have training organized?
By Country
Approach 1 One topic explained -gt demo
Approach 2 One topic explained -gt exercise
Approach 3 All topics explained -gt complex
drawing
23
Quest. 8
For an e-learning ECDL CAD course, HOW would you
like to have training organized?
By Gender
Approach 1 One topic explained -gt demo
Approach 2 One topic explained -gt exercise
Approach 3 All topics explained -gt complex
drawing
24
Quest. 8
For an e-learning ECDL CAD course, HOW would you
like to have training organized?
Overall
Approach 1 One topic explained -gt demo
Approach 2 One topic explained -gt exercise
Approach 3 All topics explained -gt complex
drawing
25
Quest. 9
Do you need a paper-based training manual too?
By Country
26
Quest. 9
Do you need a paper-based training manual too?
By Gender
27
Quest. 9
Do you need a paper-based training manual too?
Overall
28
Quest. 10
Would you prefer to have the ECDL test as in (a)
or (b)?
By Country
(a) Completely remote and on-line
(b) At an approved testing centre
29
Quest. 10
Would you prefer to have the ECDL test as in (a)
or (b)?
(a) Completely remote and on-line
By Gender
(b) At an approved testing centre
30
Quest. 10
Would you prefer to have the ECDL test as in (a)
or (b)?
(a) Completely remote and on-line
Overall
(b) At an approved testing centre
31
Presentation Outline

• Introduction
• Survey Approach
• Survey Analysis
• Conclusions

32
Conclusions

• Sample sufficiently mixed to have a good
  representation of the target audience
• Results give good indication of training
  approach to adopt
• Results clearly indicate preferred mode of
  testing.