Title: Financial Globalization, Corporate Governance, and Eastern Europe
1Financial Globalization, Corporate Governance,
and Eastern Europe
2Is the financial world flat?
- Since end of World War II, dramatic reduction in
barriers to international investment. - Neo-classical model predicts a flat world for
finance Extensive risk-sharing across countries
and reduction in the role of countries. - Lucas (1990) argues that since marginal
productivity of capital is higher in emerging
markets, capital should flow to emerging markets
form developed markets. - What do we see? A world that is not flat.
3Neo-classical world upside down?
4Why is the financial world not flat?
- With weak governance, the return from investing
does not accrue fully to the providers of capital
because of what I call the twin agency problems. - Agency problem at the firm level Corporate
insiders consume private benefits. - Agency problem at the state level State rulers
consume private benefits.
5Implications of twin agency problems
- With the twin agency problems, the financial
world is not flat. - The twin agency problems lead to ownership
concentration. - Therefore, countries where the twin agency
problems are important cannot take full advantage
of financial globalization.
6Roadmap
- The twin agency problems.
- Implications for financial globalization.
- Eastern Europe.
- Conclusion.
7The Model
Date 0
Private benefits
State expropriation
Entrepreneur starts firm
Sells equity to public
Liquidating dividend
Entrepreneur does not start firm
Becomes portfolio investor
8The First Twin Agency Problems with Corporate
Insiders
- Corporate insiders consume private benefits
- Planes, easy life, outright theft
- Deadweight cost of private benefits is higher in
countries with better investor protection - Ex post incentives to extract private benefits
fall as the insiders stake in the firm grows - More co-investment is optimal when investor
protection is weaker
9The Second Twin Agency Problems with State
Rulers
- Extract private benefits also
- Redistributive taxes, confiscate assets, require
bribes - Managerial entrenchment limits expropriation by
state rulers - Firms with professional managers and atomistic
shareholders are inefficient when problem is
serious
10Twin Agency Problems
- Problems interact with one another
- Empirically, low expropriation risk is a
necessary condition for diffuse ownership - Family control of firms is prevalent in all
countries with moderate or high risk of state
expropriation
11The value of cash
12Ownership concentration and financial
globalization
- Financial globalization reduces the cost of
capital. - With ownership concentration, a firm can take
advantage of a reduction in the cost of capital
only to the extent that insiders can co-invest. - Hence, the impact of financial globalization is
lower when ownership is concentrated.
13The neo-classical world
14The world with the twin agency problems
15Macroeconomic implications
- Home bias.
- Savings-investment correlation.
- Consumption correlation across countries.
- Financial market development.
- Economic growth.
16Eastern Europe
- How good is governance?
- Use World Bank indicators and compare to similar
income countries as well as to Western countries.
17Governance indicator Overall
18Governance indicator Rule of law
19Governance indicator Corruption
20Implication
- From the theory, we expect concentrated
ownership. - Source of data is Worldscope.
- Alternative approaches also show that ownership
is concentrated in Eastern Europe.
21Ownership concentration in Eastern Europe
22Ownership concentration through time
23What about alternative ways to control agency
problems?
- Doidge, Karolyi and Stulz show that country
characteristics explain most of the firm-level
variation in governance. - Use CSLA rating for firm-level governance in
Eastern Europe. Other firm-level governance
ratings generally used do not rate firms in
Eastern Europe.
24CSLA ratings
25Firm valuations
- Expect low firm valuations.
- Data on Tobins q from Doidge, Karolyi, and
Stulz. - Data from Worldscope.
26Tobins Q in 2004
27Financial development
- The analysis implies that the problems documented
so far are accompanied by low financial
development. - Data from IMF.
28Financial Development in Eastern Europe
29Foreign investor participation
- Expect low foreign investor participation.
- Data from U.S. Treasury International Capital
System (TIC) for U.S. investors.
30U.S. portfolio holdings in Eastern Europe
31Problems with governance reform
- Insiders have paid for their private benefits, so
reform that restricts consumption of private
benefits takes money away from them. - Hence, governance reform must be designed so that
it benefits insiders as well for it to happen. - Insiders can gain because they can sell their
stake and benefit from diversification. - Importance of financial openness as a solution.
32Conclusion
- The financial world is not flat because of the
twin agency problems. - Poor governance leads to ownership concentration
which prevents countries from taking advantage of
financial globalization. - Evidence for Eastern Europe consistent with the
theory Poor governance, high ownership
concentration, low firm valuation, low financial
development, and low participation by foreign
investors. - Improvements in governance would make it possible
for Eastern Europe to benefit more from financial
globalization, but such improvements have to be
made in a way that benefits incumbents as well
for them to be successful.