Adaptation of Mimulus guttatus Phrymaceae to serpentine soil - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Adaptation of Mimulus guttatus Phrymaceae to serpentine soil

Description:

Adaptation of Mimulus guttatus Phrymaceae to serpentine soil – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: kristy84
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Adaptation of Mimulus guttatus Phrymaceae to serpentine soil


1
Adaptation of Mimulus guttatus (Phrymaceae) to
serpentine soil Kristy U. BradyDepartment of
Biology University of Washington
2
Many Thanks! Toby Bradshaw Meade Krosby Liz
Van Volkenburgh Suzie Graham Josh
Tewksbury Christina Pince Sarah
Reichard David Haak Art
Kruckeberg Margaret Hendrick Dick Walker Joe
Callizo, Paul Aigner Cathy Koehler Doug Ewing,
Jeanette Milne, Paul Beeman Judy Farrow,
Patti Owens, Dave King Biology Staff
3
Adaptive Evolution
Adaptation to novel environments leads to
speciation.
4
  • Serpentine Systems are Great for Studying
    Adaptive Evolution
  • Extensive literature available
  • Strong selection imposed by factors amenable to
    manipulative experiments in the field,
    greenhouse, and lab
  • Differential adaptation demonstrated by
    reciprocal transplants
  • Physiological differences between serpentine and
    non-serpentine races and sister taxa permit
    investigation of speciation mechanisms and
    evolutionary trajectories

5
  • Serpentine Soil
  • Originates in the Earths mantle
  • Adverse chemical conditions including
  • Low CaMg
  • Low levels of nutrients (e.g., P, K)
  • High levels of heavy metals (e.g., Ni, Cr, Fe)
  • Rocky and often steep with sparse vegetative
    cover
  • Plant morphological responses include
  • Reduced stature
  • Xeromorphic foliage
  • Highly developed root systems
  • High rates of plant endemism

6
Insight Into Mineral Nutrition Physiology
Magnesium deposits at White Seep, McLaughlin
Natural Reserve, California, USA
7
Insight Into Endemism
  • In California, USA, serpentine soil comprises
    1.5 of landscape, but hosts 13 of endemic
    plant species.
  • 11 of CA plant taxa listed as threatened or
    endangered are serpentine endemics.
  • (Safford, Viers, Harrison, 2005, Madroño.)

8
Serpentinized Rock in Architecture
9
Kruckeberg (1985) Two Strategies for Serpentine
Tolerance
  • Endemic species
  • Restricted to serpentine soil
  • Bodenvag or indifferent species
  • Widely distributed species with populations or
    races occurring on serpentine soil.

10
  • Mimulus guttatus
  • (Common Monkeyflower, Yellow Monkeyflower, Seep
    Monkeyflower)
  • Wide-ranging distribution.
  • Found in seeps, riparian areas.
  • A bodenvag species populations on and off
    serpentine soil.
  • Thrives in a greenhouse environment.

11
Mimulus as a study system
  • Long history of study
  • Phylogeny
  • Genetic genomic tools

12
Location
13
Survival After 6 Weeks on Serpentine Soil (n11)
Photos taken 6 days after transplanting onto
treatment soil.
14
Segregating Population
15
Segregating Population
NP
F2
SP
F2
F2
16
First Transplant
17
Transplant Details
  • Serpentine soil collected from McLaughlin Natural
    Reserve, CA.
  • Plants germinated on greenhouse soil.
  • Transplanted onto treatment soil 2 weeks after
    germination.
  • Growth, flowering, and red phenotype data
    collected every other day for 4-5 weeks after
    transplanting.

18
Flowering as a Fitness Indicator
  • Proportion of Individuals that Flowered

Mode of inheritance F1s suggest dominance
19
Red Phenotype as a Fitness Indicator
  • Mean red score for last 11 days of transplant

Number of effective factors (Lande 1981)
6.5Maximum magnitude of leading factor 39
20
Second Transplant
21
Soil Elemental Differences Examined
22
Two Sets of Hypotheses Tested
  • Mechanistic hypotheses
  • Adaptive differences between serpentine plants
    (SP) and non-serpentine plants (NP) that enable
    SP to survive on serpentine soil.
  • Ca-limiting hypotheses
  • Testing whether supplementing serpentine soil
    with Ca enables NP to survive.

23
Hypotheses
Mechanistic SP are able to survive on serpentine
soil because they are equipped with one or more
of the following traits, which NP lack
Tolerance of low CaMg High Mg requirement Mg
toxicity avoidance Heavy metal toxicity avoidance
Ca-limiting Supplementing serpentine soil with
Ca ameliorates serpentine conditions for NP by
altering the following
Low CaMg Mg toxicity susceptibility Heavy metal
toxicity susceptibility
24
Transplant Details
  • Serpentine soil collected from McLaughlin Natural
    Reserve, CA.
  • Plants germinated on greenhouse soil.
  • Transplanted onto treatment soil approx. 2 weeks
    after germination.
  • Plants watered with dH2O or a 4mM Ca(NO3)2
    solution.
  • 10 days after transplanting onto treatment soil,
    leaf tissue collected for ICP-MS.

25
Hypothesis 1 CaMg
  • Mechanistic Loew May (1901) low CaMg of
    serpentine soil problematic for non-serpentine
    plants.
  • SP tolerate the low CaMg ratio in serpentine
    soil better than NP.
  • Prediction SP preserve a higher CaMg in
    their leaf tissue than NP when grown on
    serpentine soil.
  • Ca-limiting Kruckeberg (1954) addition of Ca
    (CaSO4) to serpentine soil permitted
    non-serpentine strains of Phacelia californica to
    survive on serpentine soil.
  • Supplementing Ca to serpentine soil ameliorates
    the serpentine effect by increasing Ca
    availability.
  • Prediction NP have a higher CaMg in their
    leaf tissue when grown on serpentine soil
    supplemented with Ca.

26
Hypothesis 1 CaMg
n11, one-tailed t-test, experiment-wise P
0.05, Bonferroni corrected
27
Conclusions for M. guttatus
Mechanistic SP are able to survive on serpentine
soil because they are equipped with one or more
of the following traits, which NP lack
Tolerance of low CaMg
?
Ca-limiting Supplementing serpentine soil with
Ca ameliorates serpentine conditions for NP by
altering the following
Low CaMg
?
? hypothesis not supported by data ?
hypothesis supported by data
28
Hypothesis 2 Mg requirement
  • Mechanistic Madhok Walker (1969) The
    serpentine sunflower Helianthus bolanderi ssp.
    exilis requires high external levels of Mg for
    optimal growth.
  • For optimal growth, SP require higher levels of
    Mg externally than NP.
  • Prediction Without high levels of Mg
    externally, SP will experience a reduced growth
    rate.

29
Hypothesis 2 Mg requirement
n11, one-tailed t-test, experiment-wise P
0.05, Bonferroni corrected
30
Conclusions for M. guttatus
Mechanistic SP are able to survive on serpentine
soil because they are equipped with one or more
of the following traits, which NP lack
Tolerance of low CaMg High Mg requirement
? ?
Ca-limiting Supplementing serpentine soil with
Ca ameliorates serpentine conditions for NP by
altering the following
Low CaMg
?
? hypothesis not supported by data ?
hypothesis supported by data
31
Hypothesis 3 Mg toxicity
  • Mechanistic Proctor (1970 1971)
    non-serpentine plants are susceptible to Mg
    toxicity on serpentine soil.
  • SP avoid Mg toxicity whereas NP are susceptible
    to Mg toxicity on serpentine soil.
  • Prediction SP maintain lower levels of Mg in
    their leaf tissue than NP when grown on
    serpentine soil.
  • Ca-limiting Proctor (1971) addition of Ca
    (CaSO4 or CaCO3) to serpentine soil ameliorated
    Mg toxicity in oats (Avena sativa var.
    Victory).
  • Supplementing Ca to serpentine soil decreases
    amount of Mg taken up by NP.
  • Prediction NP contain lower levels of Mg in
    their leaf tissue when grown on serpentine soil
    supplemented with Ca.

32
Hypothesis 3 Mg toxicity
n11, one-tailed t-test, experiment-wise P
0.05, Bonferroni corrected
33
Conclusions for M. guttatus
Mechanistic SP are able to survive on serpentine
soil because they are equipped with one or more
of the following traits, which NP lack
Tolerance of low CaMg High Mg requirement Mg
toxicity avoidance
? ? ?
Ca-limiting Supplementing serpentine soil with
Ca ameliorates serpentine conditions for NP by
altering the following
Low CaMg Mg toxicity susceptibility
? ?
? hypothesis not supported by data ?
hypothesis supported by data
34
Hypothesis 4 Heavy metal toxicity
  • Mechanistic
  • SP exclude potentially toxic heavy metals present
    at high levels in serpentine soil (Cr, Ni) better
    than NP.
  • Prediction SP maintain lower levels of toxic
    heavy metals in their leaf tissue than NP when
    both are grown on serpentine soil.

Ca-limiting b. Supplementing Ca to serpentine
soil decreases the quantity of potentially toxic
heavy metals taken up by NP, thus ameliorating
the serpentine effect. Prediction NP
contain lower levels of heavy metals in their
leaf tissue when grown on serpentine soil
supplemented with Ca.
35
Hypothesis 4 Heavy metal toxicity
n11, one-tailed t-test, experiment-wise P
0.05, Bonferroni corrected
36
Conclusions for M. guttatus
Mechanistic SP are able to survive on serpentine
soil because they are equipped with one or more
of the following traits, which NP lack
Tolerance of low CaMg High Mg requirement Mg
toxicity avoidance Heavy metal toxicity
avoidance
? ? ? ?
Ca-limiting Supplementing serpentine soil with
Ca ameliorates serpentine conditions for NP by
altering the following
Low CaMg Mg toxicity susceptibility Heavy metal
toxicity susceptibility
? ? ? Cr ? Ni
? hypothesis not supported by data ?
hypothesis supported by data
37
Conclusions for M. guttatus
Mechanistic SP are able to survive on serpentine
soil because they are equipped with one or more
of the following traits, which NP lack
Tolerance of low CaMg High Mg requirement Mg
toxicity avoidance Heavy metal toxicity
avoidance
? ? ? ?
Ca-limiting Supplementing serpentine soil with
Ca ameliorates serpentine conditions for NP by
altering the following
Low CaMg Mg toxicity susceptibility Heavy metal
toxicity susceptibility
? ? ? Cr ? Ni
? hypothesis not supported by data ?
hypothesis supported by data
38
More than one way to solve a problem Nectar
feeding birds
39
More than one way to solve a problem Serpentine
tolerance
  • Likely to be more than one physiological
    mechanism that confers tolerance to serpentine
    soil.
  • Ion uptake discrimination
  • Ion translocation and/or sequestration properties
  • Chelation

40
  • Future Work
  • Investigate serpentine tolerance at the root
    level using chemically-defined nutrient
    solutions.
  • What is happening at the root-soil interface?
  • How does membrane permeability differ between
    serpentine and non-serpentine plants?
  • How are elements stored in the root?
  • Investigate genetic component of serpentine
    tolerance.
  • Generate a QTL map
  • Develop NILs

41
  • Future Work
  • Investigate evolutionary trajectories of
    different serpentine populations.
  • Do different populations arrive at the same
    solution to the serpentine problem or are there
    multiple pathways to tolerance within a species?
  • In California, USA, serpentine soil comprises
    1.5 of landscape, but hosts 13 of endemic
    plant species.
  • 11 of CA plant taxa listed as threatened or
    endangered are serpentine endemics.

42
Many Thanks!
43
Soil Elemental Differences (Complete Table)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com