Title: Centre For Parent And Child Support Guys Hospital
1Centre For Parent And Child SupportGuys Hospital
Promoting Childrens Mental Health The Family
Partnership Model Professor Hilton Davis
2Plan of Presentation
Family Needs and Service Problems Need for Theory
Driven, Systematic Preventive Work Present the
Family Partnership Model Consider the
Implications of the Model for Practice Illustrate
the Related Research
3 Further Information
www.cpcs.org.uk Centre for Parent and Child
Support, Guys Hospital
4Justification for Promotional Approach
Highest cause of disability in children. Problems
getting worse. Distressing to all
involved. Impairs all aspects of
development. Highly related to crime. Associated
with adult mental health problems. Expensive to
treat. Services are not meeting the needs.
5Office For National Statistics (UK)
Prevalence of child mental health
disorders 10 5 Social Class I vs. 15
Social Class V (Meltzer et al, 2000)
6Office For National Statistics (UK)
Prevalence of child mental health disorders Lone
Parents 16 vs. 8 Two
Parents Reconstituted Family 15 vs.
9 No Step-children 5 Children 18 vs.
8 2 Children No Parental Qualification 15
vs. 6 Degree Both Unemployed 20
vs. 8 Both Working (Meltzer et
al, 2000)
7Lewisham Needs Assessment
48 Children with One or More Severe
Psychological Problems. 20 Children with Three
or More Severe Problems. Random Sample (n
427) Number of problems explored
53 Attride-Stirling et al (2001)
8Lewisham Needs Assessment
48.1 Families with Three or More Risk
Factors Random Sample (n 427)
Number of Risk Factors Explored
44 Attride-Stirling et al (2001)
9Lewisham Needs Assessment
23 Expressed a Need for Help
Currently Attride-Stirling et al (2001)
10Review of Literature
These findings are sobering. In most of the
studies described, programs struggled to enroll,
engage and retain families. When program
benefits were demonstrated, they usually accrued
only to a subset of the families , they rarely
occurred for all of a programs goals, and the
benefits were often quite modest in
magnitude. Gomby, Culross Behrman (1999).
Home visiting recent program evaluations.
Future of Children, 9, 4-26.
11Theoretical Basis of Partnership Model
Davis H, Day C. Bidmead C (2002). Working in
Partnership with Parents The Parent Adviser
Model. London Harcourt Assessment
12Family Partnership Model
Construction Processes
Partnership
Helper Qualities
Helper Skills
Process
Outcomes
13Intended Outcomes of Helping
Do no harm Help parents identify, clarify and
manage problems. Enable parents (including
problem anticipation). Enable development and
well-being of children. Facilitate social support
and community development. Enable service
support. Compensate where necessary. Change the
system.
14Family Partnership Model
Construction Processes
Partnership
Helper Qualities
Helper Skills
Process
Outcomes
15The Helping Process
RELATIONSHIP BUILDING EXPLORATION UNDERS
TANDING GOAL SETTING STRATEGY
PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW
END
16Family Partnership Model
Construction Processes
Partnership
Helper Qualities
Helper Skills
Process
Outcomes
17Partnership
Active participation/involvement Sharing power
with parents leading. Complementary
expertise. Agreeing aims and process. Negotiation.
Mutual trust and respect. Openness and
honesty. Clear communication.
18Family Partnership Model
Construction Processes
Partnership
Helper Qualities
Helper Skills
Process
Outcomes
19Communication Skills Of Helpers
Attention/Active listening Prompting and
exploration Empathic responding Summarizing
Enabling change Negotiating Problem solving
20Family Partnership Model
Construction Processes
Partnership
Helper Qualities
Helper Skills
Process
Outcomes
21Essential Qualities Of The Helper
Professional expertise Respect Genuineness Empathy
Humility Quiet enthusiasm Personal integrity
22Family Partnership Model
Construction Processes
Partnership
Helper Qualities
Helper Skills
Process
Outcomes
23Construing
All build construction system As model to
anticipate and adapt Constructions derive from
previous experience Unique to the individual Not
necessarily conscious or verbal Constant process
of testing, clarification and change Constructions
of others determine interaction
24Implications of Model
Need to recruit for qualities and skills of
helpers. Need to train in the Model. Need to
manage and support effectively.
25Parallel Processes Platinum Rule
Do unto others as you would have others do unto
others. Pawl (1994-95)
26People Trained
Health Visitors, Paediatric and School Nurses
Therapists Speech, Physios,
OTs Paediatricians, Psychologists,
Psychotherapists Teachers All Ages and Special
Needs Early Years and Child Care Staff, Youth
Workers Social Workers and Educational Welfare
Officers Parents and Voluntary Agency Staff
27Family Partnership Training Manual
Davis H, Day C Bidmead C (2002). The Parent
Adviser Training Manual. London Harcourt
Assessment
28EEPP Families In Need (UK)
HV Research Judgment
Judgment Intervention 62 (55) 77
(68) Comparison 25 (24) 73 (71)
29Frequency of Problems Rated by Trained and
Untrained Health Visitors
Trained Untrained Mental health problems
(plt 0.001) 19 3 Marital discord (p 0.008)
23 6 Social isolation (plt 0.001) 30
4 Financial problems (plt 0.001) 19
1 Adverse life events (p 0.041) 15 6
30Accuracy Of Specific Need Identification
Intervention Comparison
Cyprus 55 67 Finland 61 68 Greece 78
32 Serbia 53 47 UK 66 32 Total
62 49
31Mothers Satisfaction with EEPP Service (Medians)
Intervention Comparison
p Cyprus 33 38 0.003 Finland
20.5 21 0.2 Greece 13 20
0.0002 Serbia 16 19 0.08 UK 20 25
0.03 Total 20.5 25 Average effect
size 0.4
32Suffering
Suffering is not a question that demands an
answer it is not a problem that demands a
solution it is a mystery that demands a
presence. Anon.
33 Further Information
www.cpcs.org.uk Centre for Parent and Child
Support, Guys Hospital