IR Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Institutional Repository - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

IR Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Institutional Repository

Description:

The support that researchers need to meet their goals is not currently provided ... The Plethora of Other Possibilities. Research Needs and Services Grid ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: ricky47
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IR Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Institutional Repository


1
IR Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying
and Love the Institutional Repository
  • Ricky Erway
  • CNI Briefing
  • April 6, 2009

2
Citadel or
3
  • The support that researchers need to meet their
    goals is not currently provided by the typical
    research library, --- and the gap between what
    they need and what is provided is growing wider

4
The Research Information Management Universe
Scholar Scopus WoK WorldCat Oaister
CiteSeer Google Books datasets databases
EEBO/ECCO VREs repositories etc
Large research-oriented (tend toward
STEM) Smaller research-oriented (tend toward
humanities) Tenure issues Funding issues
Data Environment
Institution
Domain
User
Assessment Regime
Comfort zone, but with competition issues
Self-assessment (Netherlands Nordic) Funding-base
d (UK, Australia) Tenure based (US) PR and
institutional reputation (all)
5
RLG Research Information Management (RIM) Program
6
Mind the Layers
Rick Luce ARL/CNI presentation October 2008
7
RLG Research Information Management Activity
  • Report on Scholarly Information Practices
  • WRAP consultancy
  • Joint investigation with RIN
  • Projects with the RLG Partnership
  • Testing the desirability of research services
  • A RIM manifesto
  • Role of libraries in data curation
  • Changing roles of library staff
  • Rejected or deferred projects
  • Welcome your input

8
RIM Activity
  • Report on Scholarly Information Practices
  • WRAP consultancy
  • Possible joint investigation with RIN
  • Projects with the RLG Partnership
  • Testing the desirability of research services
  • A RIM manifesto
  • Role of libraries in data curation
  • Changing roles of library staff
  • Rejected or deferred projects
  • Welcome your input

9
Institution Domain User
10
First, some context . . .
11
Analytic Framework Methodology
  • Identify current themes in the literature
    reflecting on expectations in the online
    environment and how library services can address
    those expectations
  • Identified functions common to scholarly activity
    across disciplines Searching, Collecting,
    Reading, Writing, Collaborating
  • Opportunities for shared service development
    Knowledge organization, discovery, curation
  • Some solutions will be found outside the library
  • Core service requirements can be modeled
    generically

12
Patterns of Convergence in Scholarly Practice

Interdisciplinary probing translating
accessing assessing chaining disseminating network
ing
Humanities
Sciences
direct searching
scanning co-authoring coordinating
monitoring data-sharing
browsing collecting
re-reading
assembling consulting
note-taking
Adapted from C. Palmer, L. Teffau, C. Pirmann
(2009)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Workflows in Research Assessment Program (WRAP)
Consultancy
  • Survey library roles in research assessment
    data-gathering regimes within research
    universities in
  • UK
  • Netherlands
  • Denmark
  • Republic of Ireland
  • Australia
  • Describe the assessment regimes, placing them on
    a spectrum from high- to low-intervention, noting
    national characteristics.

Assessment Regime Institution
15
Joint project with UK Research Information Network
  • Investigate methods of managing places of
    intersection around research support on campus

Data Environment Institution User
16
RIM Activity
  • Report on Scholarly Information Practices
  • WRAP consultancy
  • Possible joint investigation with RIN
  • Projects with the RLG Partnership
  • Testing the desirability of research services
  • A RIM manifesto
  • Role of libraries in data curation
  • Changing roles of library staff
  • Rejected or deferred projects
  • Welcome your input

17
List of Research Support Services (slide 1 of 2)
  • We will
  • provide you dedicated space on a server.
  • help you structure space to organize your notes,
    datasets, others publications, presentations
  • help you load it if you like.
  • back up your work.
  • ensure you can access your data remotely, no
    matter where you are.
  • provide tools for group work and version control
    at the file level.
  • help you manage your research, tracking who is
    involved in which grant, which research is funded
    by which grant, and purchasing grant-funded
    equipment. (cont.)

Data Environment Institution User
18
List of Research Support Services (slide 2 of 2)
  • (Cont.) We will
  • help you negotiate publication rights.
  • help you comply with NIH and other requirements.
  • see that your work is disseminated broadly,
    quickly, and openly and that you get maximum
    impact for you and your university.
  • do the authority work to ensure you are credited
    for all your work, despite the various forms of
    your name used in indicating authorship.
  • keep your personal bibliography up-to-date.
  • provide you with a customizable personal web
    page.
  • include you in the campus expertise database and
    facilitate inclusion in disciplinary expert
    databases.
  • preserve your outputs in the institutional
    repository and facilitate inclusion in
    disciplinary repositories.
  • see that you can take your work with you if you
    leave this institution

19
Bold Roadmap
  • Write manifesto that is a call to action about
    new roles we need to take on -- and compromises
    we may have to make to do so.

Data Environment Assessment Regime Institution
20
Data Curation
  • Assess library contributions related to data
    curation
  • Big science vs. little science and humanities
  • Derivative data and source data
  • Data lifecycle management
  • Data reuse
  • Institutional vs. disciplinary approaches

21
Changing Roles of Library Staff
  • Explore changing roles of library staff
  • Increasing demands
  • Role of "data librarians"
  • Faculty liaison role
  • Specialization in rights and open access
  • Ways to work with departments to increase data
    management awareness and skills

22
RIM Activity
  • Report on Scholarly Information Practices
  • WRAP consultancy
  • Possible joint investigation with RIN
  • Projects with the RLG Partnership
  • Testing the desirability of research services
  • A RIM manifesto
  • Role of libraries in data curation
  • Changing roles of library staff
  • Rejected or deferred projects
  • Welcome your input

23
The Plethora of Other Possibilities
  • Research Needs and Services Grid
  • Personal Name Disambiguation
  • Institutional Name Disambiguation
  • Impact Optimization
  • Assessment Approaches
  • Internal Research Assessment
  • Expertise Profiling

24
Research Needs and Services Grid
  • Map the research support landscape
  • research activities
  • examples of the services that exist to support
    them
  • RLG Partnership Council support
  • RLG RIM interest group, not so much

25
The high-level view of the Research Information
Management Workflow
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Personal Name Consistency
  • Investigate personal name consistency
    possibilities, by doing one or more of the
    following
  • Refine use cases
  • Compare related efforts at other institutions and
    organizations
  • Conduct a personal name disambiguation project
    that would get us closer to a name server that
    could be used by a variety of applications

29
Institutional Name Disambiguation
  • Participate in an assessment of approaches for
    institutional name disambiguation.
  • Investigate what institutions are doing now
  • Consider what other efforts might inform and
    improve current practice

30
Impact Optimization
  • Develop a project to referee impact optimization
    during the publication journey.
  • Would require cooperation of publishing faculty
  • Conduct pre-publication consultations
  • Suggest things to increase a papers potential
    impact (some to be undertaken by the library
    others for the faculty member to consider)
  • Use feedback to inform further work

31
Expertise Profiling
  • Assess various approaches to expertise profiling
  • Ways of gathering data
  • Intended uses
  • Policy issues
  • Outputs for other uses
  • Compare institutional to discipline profiles
  • Commercial approaches

32
The Other Two
  • Compare assessment approaches
  • Compare bibliometrics to peer review
  • Investigate the differences for monographs as
    opposed to journal articles
  • Try a test on a text corpus
  • Explore internal research assessment
  • Are approaches used for external assessment
    adequate for self-evaluation?
  • Recommend approaches for assessing publications,
    citations, usage measures, and other indicators

33
Comments?
  • Report on Scholarly Information Practices
  • WRAP consultancy
  • Possible joint investigation with RIN
  • Projects with the RLG Partnership
  • Testing the desirability of research services
  • A RIM manifesto
  • Role of libraries in data curation
  • Changing roles of library staff
  • Rejected or deferred projects
  • Welcome your input

34
Resources
  • Research Information Management Program
  • www.oclc.org/programs/ourwork/researchinfo
  • OCLC Research White Papers
  • www.oclc.org/programs/publications/reports.htm
  • Ricky Erway
  • erwayr_at_oclc.org
  • Thanks to my collaborators, Constance Malpas and
    John MacColl

35
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com