Substorm Activity during CME and CIR Driven Storms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Substorm Activity during CME and CIR Driven Storms

Description:

Substorm Activity during CME and CIR Driven Storms ... Which magnetic storms produce relativistic electrons at geosynchronous orbit? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: facultyI3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Substorm Activity during CME and CIR Driven Storms


1
Substorm Activity during CME and CIR Driven Storms
  • Smitha Thampi, Diwakar Tiwari, Ruigang Wang, Hui
    Zhang, Ling Qian Zhang, Yihua Zheng
  • Tutor Robert L. McPherron

2
Introduction Scientific Background
  • Geomagnetic storms, in which the global
    geomagnetic field intensity decreases on the
    order of tens to hundreds nT, are large scale
    phenomena in the solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphe
    re coupling.
  • Geomagnetic storms develop when solar
    wind-magnetosphere couplings are intensified by
    solar wind disturbances (coronal holes and CMEs).
  • Types of Geomagnetic storms CME driven, CIR
    driven, (others)

Solar maximum (CMEs)
Solar minimum (CIRs)
3
Introduction Scientific Background --- continued
  • Characteristics (view of the present) the storms
    driven by the fast CMEs are usually very intense
    (Dst lt-100 nT), while the storms diven by CIRs
    are usually weaker and their main phase has
    irregular profile and long recover phase lasting
    many days to weeks and cause High Intensity Long
    Duration Continuous AE Activity (HILDCAAs). Since
    they are caused by recurrent high speed streams,
    they are ordered in time.
  • Importance Although CIR storms are weak, they
    may be very important in generating relativitic
    electrons (semiannual variation of killer
    electrons and Dst in solar minimum), which are
    detremental to spacecraft, human in space and so
    on. gt
  • Focus of the proposal Characteristics of CIR
    storms and the differences and similarities
    between the two types of magnetic storms

4
CIR storms killer e- fluxes
High flux of killer electrons appear in solar
minimum
Killer electrons' semiannual variations
Dst also has semiannual variations
gt solar min storms correlate with killer
electron fluxes
5
Scientific Objectives
  • Scientific objectives to understand the
    characteristics, and the differences and
    similarities of the solar origin (the driver) of
    the two types of magnetic storms and the
    differences and similarities of the ionosphere's
    responses to the two-type storms via auroral
    activities. Specifically, we will use 40 years of
    solar wind and IMF data along with other
    necessary parameters to study
  • Difference (if any) between CME and CIR Storms
    (solar wind and IMF para.)
  • Distribution of AE during CME and CIR storms
  • Duration of AE disturbances in the recovery phase
    of two types of storms
  • The role of Russell-McPherron effect on CIR
    storms
  • Effects of the two storm types on relativistic
    electrons
  • Other Ionospheric effects caused by the two
    types. (???? more specific?)

6
Significance of the proposal
  • Scientifically this investigation will help in
    better understanding the following outstanding
    questions related to geomagnetic storms a) the
    role of solar wind density in storm growth? b)
    How do the properties of storms change with the
    solar cycle? c) Does storm development depend on
    season and universal time?
  • Pratically with better understanding of the
    driver characteristics of two types of storms
    during solar minimum and solar maximum, it will
    help us in a better definition of forecasting
    procedure from the solar origin, which is crucial
    in space weather forecasting.
  • Relativistic (killer) electrons are
    detremental to satellites, human in space and can
    also create great damage on the ground. They are
    known to have high fluxes during solar minimum
    and are possibly correlated to CIR driven storms.
    Understanding their relationship is very
    important for reducing or minimizing their
    damaging effects.

7
Approach
  • Data sets required
  • OMNI data
  • Synchronous relativistic electron fluxes
  • ISCAT/SuperDARN Range-Time-Intensity/Velocity
  • Preprocessing
  • Data editing and creation of Matlab binary files
  • Analysis tools
  • Plot solar wind and IMF data along with AE and
    Dst indices to select events and then the
    significant times for further analysisgt
  • Use Matlab built-in functions and/or procedures
    and also develop necessary software to perform
    statistical analysis and display tools

8
Details on analysis approaches
An example of how to find CIR recurrent high
speed stream interface
9
Preliminary results
10
Preliminary results
11
Preliminary Results
12
Work Plan (1 year)
  • Data Downloading Ruigang Wang and Hui Zhang
    (1month)
  • Software development Diwakar Tiwari, Smitha
    Thampi (1 month)
  • Literature search and knowledge enhancement
    Yihua Zheng and Ling Qian
  • Zhang (1 month)
  • These are done simultaneously.
  • Event selection and data analysis divide and
    conquer, each of
  • the team members perform the investigation for
    several years (10 month)
  • nterpretation of the results all (1 month)

13
References
1. Gonzalez, W. D., B. T. Tsurutani and A. L. C.
Gonzalez, Interplanetary origin of geomagnetic
storms, Space Sci. Rev. 88, 529-562,1999 2.
Kamide, Y., R.L. McPherron, W.D. Gonzalez, D.C.
Hamilton, H.S. Hudson, J.A. Joselyn, S.W. Kahler,
L.R. Lyons, H. Lundstedt, and E. Szuszczewicz,
Magnetic storms Current understanding and
outstanding questions, in Proceedings of the
Chapman Conference on Magnetic Storms, pp. 1-19,
American Geophysical Union, Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, 1997. 3. McPherron,
R.L., Physical processes producing magnetospheric
substorms and magnetic storms, in Geomagnetism,
Vol 4, edited by J. Jacobs, pp. 593-739, Academic
Press Ltd., London, England, 1991. 4. O'Brien,
T.P., Empirical Analysis of Storm-Time Energetic
Electron Enhancements, Unviersity of California
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, 2001. 5. O'Brien, T.P.,
R.L. McPherron, D. Sornette, G.D. Reeves, R.
Friedel, and H.J. Singer, Which magnetic storms
produce relativistic electrons at geosynchronous
orbit?, Journal of Geophysical Research, 106
(A8), 15533-44, 2001. 6. Tsurutani, B. T., and
W. D. Gonzalez, The cause of high-intensity
long-duration continuous AE activity (HILDCAAS)
Interplanetary Alfven wave trains, Planet.
Space Sci., 35, 405-412, 1987. 7. Tsurutani,
B.T., and W.D. Gonzalez, The causes of
geomagnetic storms during solar maximum,
presented at Eos Trans. AGU, 1994. 8. Tsurutani,
B.T., W.D. Gonzalez, and Y. Kamide, Magnetic
storms, Surveys in Geophysics, 18, 363-383, 1997.
14
Extras
15
Motivation---some open questions in Solar Cycle
Variations in Storms
  • Is there a difference between storms at solar
    minimum and maximum?
  • Do solar minimum storms develop differently from
    solar-max storms?
  • Do these storms last longer?
  • Does the occurrence rate of substorms, SMC,
    Sawtooths in different phases of a storm change
    with solar cycle?
  • Why are there more killer electrons at solar
    minimum?
  • Why is there a strong semiannual and universal
    time variation in occurrence and size of storms
    at solar minimum?
  • What physical effects are the cause of the
    semiannual variation in Dst?
  • What effects do Alfen waves in high speed streams
    have on storms?

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com