the Clash between speedy access and seeing a doctor you know PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 15
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: the Clash between speedy access and seeing a doctor you know


1
the Clash between speedy access and seeing a
doctor you know
  • two linked studies in west London- seeking
    patients views and
  • observing receptionists
  • Navjot Gill medical studentsRachel Timms BSc
    in Social Medicine
  • George Freeman project supervisor
  • Department of Primary Care Social Medicine

2
my co-workers cannot be present today!
  • receptionist study
  • Rachel Timms BSc
  • patient study
  • Nav Gill BSc

3
background -1
  • originally all general practice was without
    appointments and todays work was done today!
  • long waits for appointments became prevalent
    often two weeks or more
  • British government responded by setting access
    targets
  • all patients should be able to see a
    professional within 24 hours and a doctor within
    48 hours

4
background - 2
  • concept of Advanced Access imported from
    California to help practices achieve new targets
  • variable implementation but many practices
    severely restrict forward booking to keep
    capacity free to meet access targets
  • patients cannot choose who they see and personal
    continuity is suffering?
  • what was happening in our locality?

5
method
  • two linked studies each in three practices
  • patient study
  • pre-consultation questionnaire in waiting room -
    200 patients in each practice
  • choice of doctor
  • problem type
  • waiting time
  • trust

6
method
  • two linked studies each in three practices
  • receptionist study
  • observed booking process during one week
  • telephone and face to face bookings
  • record on proforma sheet
  • brief receptionist interviews at end of week

7
practices
  • practice GPs receptionists patients
  • patient study
  • A 6 8,000
  • B 7 11,000
  • C 8 12,400
  • receptionist study
  • D 5 3 9,500
  • E 5 7 11,000
  • F 2 3 3,000

8
results 1 - practices and access systems
  • patient study
  • A B traditional with choice of doctor doctor
    triage for urgent requestssimilar results so
    presented together
  • C same day booking (very limited advance
    booking)
  • receptionist study
  • D same day booking - emergency slots
  • E nurse triage for urgent requests
  • F same day booking only telephone
    consultations

9
results 2 - patients
  • 651/763 completed questionnaires (85)
  • AB C
  • seeing chosen doctor 64 41
  • seen on day of request 26 81
  • wait to see a chosen doctor 34 18
  • dont mind who I see 34 42
  • write in comments 2 10

10
patients comments
  • practices A B
  • I have seen all of the doctors in this practice
    and I consult with different doctors for
    different matters. Therefore, I have many usual
    doctors. (f 44)
  • My only criticism of what I think is an
    excellent NHS practice, is that you often have to
    wait 10 days or thereabouts to see your
    doctor. (m 71)
  • practice C
  • I would usually ask for a female doctor and
    would prefer to see the same doctor but, I would
    rather see any doctor than not get an appointment
    at all. (f 25)
  • With the current appointment booking system
    here, one has to see the GP on duty. The concept
    of a usual doctor has disappeared. (f 61)
  • The present arrangement is certainly not
    working! I find great difficulty in seeing the
    doctor I want to see. Can we please go back to
    the old system or update the present system. (m
    69)

11
results receptionist observation -1 appointment
requests for a specific doctor
12
results receptionist observation - 2appointment
requests for a specific doctor
13
seven receptionist interviews
  • most thought that being seen quickly was more
    important that seeing a specific doctor
  • if a patient wishes to see a particular doctor
    they must be prepared to wait
  • inappropriate for receptionists to decide what is
    urgent
  • experience and personal knowledge does help

14
summary of results
  • GP care is indeed becoming much less personal in
    west London
  • patients are accepting change, often reluctantly
  • receptionists are responding to the priority for
    quick access
  • demand for personal care reflects its availability

15
does it matter?
  • these studies cannot measure costs and benefits
    of change away from more personal care
  • this needs more studies
  • but it is simple to monitor what is going on
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com