Title: G. Doolittle MD, D Cook PhD, M Schlyer RN, S Clay RN and R Henderson ARNP
1 Oncology Care via Telemedicine
- G. Doolittle MD, D Cook PhD, M Schlyer RN, S
Clay RN and R Henderson ARNP - University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas
City, KS Hays Medical Center, Hays KS Horton
Center for Health and Wellness, Horton KS
2University of Kansas Medical Center
3(No Transcript)
4Tele-oncology in Kansas
- Why?
- Clinical Practice
- Support Services
- Lessons Learned
- benefits to community
- satisfaction
- cost studies
5Oncology Care for Rural Kansans
- Few oncologists in the state
- Population predominantly located in urban areas
- Northwestern portion of the state medically
underserved - Cancer patients must travel long distances
- Smaller communities lack patient/financial base
to support an oncologist
6Oncology Care for Rural Kansans
- Oncology Care for Rural Kansans
- University - based outreach program
- Three communities Hays, Parsons, Pittsburg
- Physicians conducted fly-in clinics monthly
- Advantages - patients received care close to
home - local support of primary
practitioner - Disadvantages - travel time for oncologist
- pulled oncologist from
medical center - - Kansas WEATHER
7(No Transcript)
8Tele-oncology Practice
- Established six years ago
- Outreach sites Hays, Horton
- Telemedicine Sites Liberal, Beloit, Caldwell,
Parsons - Service mix
- thrice weekly telemedicine clinics
- outreach clinics--monthly
- Goals
- use telemedicine to enhance outreach practice
- practice oncology via telemedicine
92000 Kansas Tele-Oncology Sites
Beloit
Horton
Hays
KUMC
Parsons
Liberal
Caldwell
10Tele-oncology Practice
- TEAM
- Local primary care practitioner
- Local medical and radiation oncologists
- Oncology-trained nurses
- Technician
- KUMC
- Consultant Oncologist
- TeleMedicine Services scheduler, tech
- Oncology-trained nurse practitioner
11(No Transcript)
12Tele-Oncology Practice
- Patient referred by a local practitioner
- Consult is scheduled
- patient
- on-site health care provider
- consultant
- technicians
- Medical information sent prior to clinic
13Tele-oncology Practice
- Consent
- Introduction to the system
- History
- Physical exam - proxy examiner
- Review radiographs/lab
- Discussion diagnosis/treatment
14Tele-oncology Practice
- 678 clinic visits since 1993
- Hematologic / oncologic diagnoses
- No discrepancies noted between telemedicine and
on-site evaluations - Consultation
- new patient
- follow-up visits
- second opinion
15Tele-oncology Practice Diagnosis at a
distance
HEMATOLOGIC amyloidosis coagulopathy cold
agglutinin disease erythrocytosis essential
thrombocytosis hemochromatosis hyperbilirubinemia
hypercoaguable state hypercoagulation
syndrome Langerhans histiocytosis leukocytosis le
ukopenia lymphadenopathy macrocytosis monoclonal
gammopathy
MALIGNANCIES ONCOLOGIC breast cancer lung
cancer melanoma ovarian cancer sweat gland
cancer prostate cancer HEMATOLOGIC acute
myelogenous leukemia chronic lymphocytic
leukemia chronic myelogenous leukemia prolymphocyt
ic leukemia multiple myeloma non-hodgkins
lymphoma
myelodysplasia pancytopenia p. vera porphyria sple
nomegaly thrombocytopenia thrombocytosis
16Tele-oncology Practice
- Patient Demographics
- Total 167 Patients
- age range 10.2 - 96.4 years
- average age 66.7 years
- catchment area
- Hays area 113
- Horton 44
- Additional sites 10
17Tele-Oncology Practice
- Referring Practitioners
- Hays 41
- Horton 6
- Other 4
- Average time for visits
- New31 min.
- F/ U visit19 min.
18(No Transcript)
19Support Services For Tele-oncology
- Cancer Pain Management
- Tele-psychiatry
- Cancer Support Groups
- TeleHospice Project
- Educational Series patients, nurses, physicians
-
20(No Transcript)
21Tele-oncology Practice
- Lessons Learned
- communication
- reimbursement for services
- gathering patient data
- data management
- expense
- patient travel time/ acceptance
22Benefits of Tele-oncology
- Medical community
- access to hematologist/oncologist
- Patients
- receive care close to home
- minimize travel expenses
- Local revenue generated
- physician billing
- hospitalizations
- outpatient diagnostic evaluations
23Tele-oncology Research
- Studies
- efficacy
- acceptance
- cost effectiveness
- clinical utility
- organizational
24Efficacy Study for Tele-oncologyin analysis
- Patient Population
- Patients accrued the first Monday of each month
- All patients requesting a second opinion were
recruited to the study - Diagnostic Categories
- Design
- On site evaluations
- Community Oncology
- Outreach clinic
- Telemedicine Evaluation
25Cost Study for Tele-oncology
- Costs of providing telemedicine services
considering three practice scenarios - Telemedicing
- Traditional
- Outreach, fly-in clinic
- One year study period
- Two sites KUMC and Hays Medical Center
- Expenses tabulated for
- Equipment/ transmission
- Personnel
26Costs for a tele-oncology practice
- Cost per visit
- Traditional
- 149
- Telemedicine
- 812
- What about at maximum efficiency?
- Outreach
- 897
27Acceptance of Tele-oncology
- Objective to assess satisfaction level of rural
cancer patients who received care via
telemedicine - 37 patients surveyed first year of the
tele-oncology practice - 12 item survey instrument assessing satisfaction
- Seven pt scale one-strongly agree
- seven-strongly disagree
28Patient Acceptance with Tele-oncology
- I felt I could talk about anything with the
consultant - The consultant cared about me as a person
- The consultant knew what he/she was doing
- Telemedicine makes it easier to get medical care
- The care I received from this telemedicine
consultation was as good as a regular in-person
visit
29Tele-Oncology Patient Perceptions
- Interviews 22 patients
- Thematic Content Analysis
- All expressed satisfaction with Consultations
- 41 concerned about proxy examiner
- 50 percent of respondents
- Want to see oncologist in person
- Seen as a monitoring service
30Questions?