Healthy Boundaries Make for Good Governance: So Why Is It So Difficult Sometimes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Healthy Boundaries Make for Good Governance: So Why Is It So Difficult Sometimes

Description:

Healthy Boundaries Make for Good Governance: So Why Is It So Difficult Sometimes – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: marctf
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Healthy Boundaries Make for Good Governance: So Why Is It So Difficult Sometimes


1
Healthy Boundaries Make for Good Governance So
Why Is It So Difficult Sometimes?
  • Marc T. Frankel, Ph.D.
  • Senior Consultant

2
www.ta-stl.com
  • Slides are online at

3
Sources of Incendiary Material Bases of Power
4
Four Paradoxes of School Governance
  • Those most likely to serve (parents of current
    students) are also those most likely to sweat the
    small stuff.
  • Business leaders on the board may (surprise!)
    insist that the school run like a business.
  • Board members are recruited for a specific area
    of expertise and then become single-issue
    trustees.
  • Too often, the board consists of a lot of very
    smart, highly educated, and extremely successful
    people who, collectively, fail to add much value
    to the school.

5
Governance Boundary Crossings
  • ...by the Board e.g., micromanaging or bullying
    the head or misreading the culture of schools
  • by Parents/Alumni e.g., assuming a stockholder
    posture politicizing demands the telephone
    call to the trustee All the parents (or alumni)
    think.
  • To Avoid The e-mail caucus
  • New banner policy for schools Having your
    say does not equal getting your way.
  • Parental Signed Covenants and Parents on
    Probation
  • by the Head e.g., free-lancing on policy or
    getting out too far in front of the troops You
    must always cultivate the favor of the
    inhabitants. Machiavelli
  • by the Faculty e.g., subverting administrative
    or board policies, undermining collegiality, or
    ignoring the quid pro quo with parents.

6
Three Levels of Trusteeshipfrom Richard Chait
  • Level One Fiduciary (oversight and assessment of
    mission finance)
  • Level Two Strategic (less management/more
    governance via scanning and planning)
  • Level Three Generative (shared leadership, RD
    orientation for imagining and experimenting).

7
What the Board Should Do
  • Focus on what matters most.

8
The Bottom Line
  • A board or committee without a focus is a
    dangerous thing to have.

9
6 Board Conversations
  • GlobalizationWhat sort of K-12 education is
    advantageous for students living in the global
    future? (flat world or tribal warfare)
  • DemographyHow will likely demographic changes
    affect our community in 5, 10 and 20 years?
    (demography geography)
  • TalentWho will teach and how will the best
    schools find and retain them? (Many workers,
    little talent)
  • EconomicsWhat strategies prepare you for
    continuous turbulence? (scenario planning)
  • Market SegmentationWho will buy and why?
    (MindBase)
  • TechnologyWhat are the world-class examples of
    how to use technology to transform teaching and
    learning? (classroom unfixed)

10
An Analysis
  • The problem board conversations too frequently
    descend into the weeds, drawn there by members
    questions and stories from the field.
  • The solution build board agendas around
    essential topics forego committee reports
    reduce frequency of meetings monitor tenor of
    the conversation (e.g., have we deliberated in
    all three modes tonight?)

11
  • 225 South Meramec, Suite 504
  • St. Louis, Missouri 63105
  • (314) 725-8889
  • projects_at_ta-stl.com
  • www.ta-stl.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com