Efficient and Effective Process for Completing FBA within a 3-tiered Continuum - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Efficient and Effective Process for Completing FBA within a 3-tiered Continuum

Description:

Setting event. None. Antecedent. Preferred peer. Problem Behavior. Talking. Maintaining Consequence ... Design setting event strategies to eliminate or ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: teri72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Efficient and Effective Process for Completing FBA within a 3-tiered Continuum


1
Efficient and Effective Process for Completing
FBA within a 3-tiered Continuum
  • Teri Lewis-Palmer
  • July 11, 2008

2
Purpose
  • To describe the critical features of functional
    behavioral assessment-based behavior intervention
    planning (FBA-BIP) process.

3
1-5
1-5
5-10
5-10
80-90
80-90
4
What is FBA?
  • A systematic problem solving process for
    developing statements about factors that
  • Contribute to the occurrence and maintenance of
    problem behavior, and
  • More importantly, serve as basis for developing
    proactive comprehensive behavior support plans.

5
Purpose of FBA
  • Increase efficiency, relevance, effectiveness
    of behavior support interventions.
  • Improve consistency with which behavior support
    plans are implemented.
  • Increase accountability (legal professional)

6
Use FBA when
  • Students are not successful
  • Interventions need to be developed
  • Existing interventions need to made more
    effective and/or efficient

7
How do I know if I have done an FBA?
  • Description of problem behavior
  • Identification of conditions that predict when
    problem behavior will and will not occur
  • Identification of consequences that maintain
    problem behaviors (functions)

8
  • Summary statements or testable hypotheses that
    describe specific behavior, conditions, and
    reinforcers
  • Collection of direct observation data that
    support summary statements

9
FBAs do not
  • FBAs guide the development of BIP. They do not
    result in
  • Eligibility
  • Placement
  • Manifest determination
  • Can provide information that is useful for all of
    these of procedures

10
FBA Misrules
  • Only one way to collect FBA information,
  • FBA process is basically the same
  • Decisions about methods for collecting data may
    vary based on what information need to be
    collected

11
  • Must do everything every time.
  • Base FBA activities on what you know.
  • FBA is systematic behavior support planning
    process.

12
  • Everyone has to know how to do FBA.
  • Small of people must have high fluency.
  • All people must know process what to expect.
  • Some individuals must work on sustainability.

13
  • FBA is it.
  • One component of comprehensive plan of behavior
    support.
  • FBA is only for students with disability
  • Process for behavior of all individuals across
    multiple settings

14
  • Power, authority, control, intimidation,
    bullying, etc. are functionsTwo basic research
    validated functions
  • Positive reinforcement (get/access)
  • Negative reinforcement (avoid/escape)

15
(No Transcript)
16
WHAT ARE FBA STEPS (process)?
  • Collect Information to determine function.
  • Develop testable hypothesis or summary statements
    and indicate functions.
  • Collect direct observation data to confirm
    summary statement.
  • Identify desired and acceptable replacement
    behaviors.
  • Develop behavior intervention plan.
  • Develop comprehensive BIP to ensure high fidelity
    implementation.
  • Develop on-going monitoring system.

17
Step 1 Collect Information
  • Multiple sources
  • Student, parent, teacher, etc.
  • Multiple settings
  • Where it occurs doesnt occur
  • Strengths
  • Reinforcers, goals, hobbies, social skills,
    academic achievements, etc.

18
Step 1.continued
  • Multiple methods
  • Archival review
  • Office discipline referrals, behavior incident
    reports, etc.
  • Checklist/inventory
  • FACTS, routine analysis
  • Interview
  • Brief, student-guided, parent, teacher
  • Direct observation
  • ONeill et al., ABC, scatter plot. Etc.

19
Aaron
  • Teacher interview, student interview, record
    reviewWhen Aaron sits next to preferred peers,
    he talks to them to gain peer attention.

20
Defining behavior
  • Must be in operational, observable, or measurable
    terms.
  • To achieve high agreement between two people.

21
Aaron
  • Aaron whispers to three different peers during
    class instruction and independent and group work
    time. He will both initiate the interaction and
    respond to peer initiations. He talks more in
    science and social studies. Sometimes he talks
    about class topic.

22
STEP 2. Develop summary statement.
  • Testable hypothesis (objective guess).
  • Write in observable terms.
  • If not confirmable, collect more information
    restate.
  • Developed from review of assessment information.
  • Composed of (a) problem behavior, (b) triggering
    antecedent, (c) maintaining consequences, (d)
    setting events.

23
Setting events
  • Factors that make problem behavior worse (more
    likely to occur, more intense)
  • E.g., illness, fatigue, social conflict, change
    in routine,
  • Factors that change value of current reinforcers
  • E.g., verbal praise less effective, peer
    attention more influential,escaping work more
    desirable.

24
Testable Hypothesis
Setting Events
Triggering Antecedents
Maintaining Consequences
Problem Behavior
25
Testable Hypothesis
Setting Events
Triggering Antecedents
Maintaining Consequences
Problem Behavior
Peer proximity
Talks in class
Gain peer attention
None
26
STEP 3. Collect direct observation data to
confirm summary statement
  • Testable hypothesis
  • Multiple settings
  • Measures of
  • problem behavior
  • triggering antecedents,
  • maintaining consequences,
  • setting events

27
  • Collect direction information to confirm summary
    statement.

28
  • STEP 4. Developing competing pathways summary
    statement
  • Components
  • Confirmed summary statements
  • Desired replacement behavior to be displayed in
    problem situation (behavioral objective)
  • Alternative replacement behavior that could
    achieve same outcome as problem behavior

29
Competing Behavior Pathway
Existing Consequence Grades More work
Desired Behavior Work quietly
Setting event None
Antecedent Preferred peer
Problem Behavior Talking
Maintaining Consequence Gain Peer attention
Alternative Behavior Peer helper
30
  • STEP 5. Develop behavior support plan.
  • Tactics for
  • discouraging problem behavior,
  • teaching encouraging desirable acceptable
    replacement behavior,
  • preventing responding to emergency/crisis
    situations,
  • monitoring implementation effectiveness
  • Emphasis on manipulation of (a) behaviors, (b)
    antecedents, (c) consequences, (d) setting
    events

31
Guidelines
  • Design antecedent strategies to make triggering
    antecedents irrelevant.
  • So they no longer serve as triggers.
  • Design behavior teaching strategies to make
    problem behaviors inefficient.
  • So more acceptable behaviors are easier to do.

32
Guidelines
  • Design consequence strategies to make maintaining
    consequences ineffective.
  • So they no longer are present or
  • Are less reinforcing.
  • Design setting event strategies to eliminate or
    neutralize effects of setting events.
  • So they have less impact on routines
    reinforcers.

33
Aaron
Setting Events
Triggering Antecedents
Teaching Behaviors
Maintaining Consequences
  • None
  • Neutralize
  • Self-managementsheet
  • Choice of seating
  • Teacher precorrectionIrrelevant
  • Teach Aaron to- self-assess-self-monitor-self-
    recruitInefficient
  • Praise/tokens for appropriate(self peer)
  • Planned correction
  • Ineffective

34
  • STEP 6. Develop details routines for full
    implementation of behavior support plan
  • Logistics
  • E.g., schedules, people, materials, training,
    monitoring
  • Scripts for adults to
  • Modify structural/routine/environment
  • Neutralize setting events
  • Manipulate antecedent consequence events
  • Teach response/skills
  • Respond to emergency/crisis situations

35
(No Transcript)
36
Generic Plan Template
37
  • STEP 7. Monitor evaluate implementation of
    behavior support plan.
  • Data
  • Impact on
  • student behavior, lifestyle outcomes
  • significant others
  • Fidelity of implementation

38
Consider contextual fit (Albin, Lucyshyn,
Horner, Flannery, 1996)
  • Characteristics of person for whom plan is
    designed.
  • Variables related to people who will implement
    plan.
  • Features of environments systems within which
    plan will be implemented. (p. 82)

39
Aaron
A
A
B
C
C
A
1
0
0
I
n
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
B
L
B
L
F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
S
e
l
f
-
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
B
L
9
0
8
0
P
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

P
e
e
r
7
0
A
l
o
n
e
N
o
n
-
P
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

P
e
e
r
6
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
3
6
8
1
0
1
2
1
4
1
7
2
0
2
2
2
4
2
6
2
8
3
2
3
4
3
6
3
7
3
9
4
1
4
3
Observations
40
Big Ideas
  • FBA-BIP is a process designed to increase the
    effectiveness and efficiency of individualized
    behavior support planning.
  • FBA-BIP is appropriate for all students and all
    types of problem behavior.
  • Intensity of FBA-BIP should match intensity of
    problem and needs of students.

41
Additional Resources
  • www.pbis.org
  • Technical assistance guide 1
  • ONeill et al (1997). Functional assessment and
    program development for problem behavior A
    practical handbook. Pacific Grove, CA Brooks/Cole

42
Existing Consequence Less work
Desired Behavior Let others host Some events
Setting event Job Stress Deadlines
Antecedent Family event (e.g., holiday)
Problem Behavior Host all events Do all cooking
Maintaining Consequence Control
Alternative Behavior ?????
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com