Biotechnology: International Diffusion, Recent Findings, and Opportunities for China. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Biotechnology: International Diffusion, Recent Findings, and Opportunities for China.

Description:

Biotechnology: International Diffusion, Recent Findings, and Opportunities for China. ... Ownership structure murky most lack modern management ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: pray5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biotechnology: International Diffusion, Recent Findings, and Opportunities for China.


1
Biotechnology International Diffusion, Recent
Findings, and Opportunities for China.
  • Carl E. Pray
  • Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics
  • Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
  • pray_at_aesop.rutgers.edu

2
Main points
  • Spread of biotech
  • Transgenic varieties (also known as genetically
    modified or GMs) continue to spread and have a
    major impact on production
  • Other biotechnologies also important and less
    contentious, less known
  • Empirical results on key issues
  • Industry concentration
  • Biosafety regulation
  • Health impacts
  • Transgenics to the poor?
  • Opportunities for China

3
I. Spread of biotechnology
4
Adoption of biotechnology
  • Transgenic crops we know a lot because of
    controversy
  • Tissue culture extensively adopted in bananas,
    sweet potato, citrus, ornamentals
  • Genomics and marker aided selection are
    increasing productivity of conventional breeding
  • Livestock few studies BST in US, feed
    additives, vaccines and diagnostics (Rinderpest
    example)

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Which crops in commercial production?
  • Also small areas of potato, squash, papaya,
    tomato, green pepper, tobacco, chrysanthemums,
    and petunias
  • NO MAJOR SUBSISTANCE CROP EXCEPT MAIZE

9
Which traits in commercial production?
  • Also, virus resistance, increased yields, long
    shelf life, color, improved cooking oil.

10
Summary of economic impact studies
  • Insect resistance
  • High input agriculture small increase in
    yields, large reduction in pesticides, profits up
  • Low input ag large increases in yields, small
    reduction in pesticides, profits up
  • Herbicide tolerance
  • High input agriculture no increase in yields,
    reduction in pesticides and less toxic
    pesticides, profits up a little, savings in
    management
  • Low input ag studying South Africa now

11
Tissue culture and Marker Aided Selection
  • Tissue culture
  • all commercial banana seedlings to reduce disease
    and pests in early stages of growth
  • All citrus in Sao Paulo to reduce citrus cankor
  • Marker aided selection and genomics
  • Cut in half breeding times in maize, soybeans,
    and cotton in US
  • Starting to produce new traits in rice in Asia

12
II. Recent Empirical Results
13
Concentration in the US biotech industry
14
Research output US intermediate products
field trials
15
Research output US innovations
16
Private Biotech/Seed Research
  • Dramatic rise until late 1990s
  • Since 2000 RD stagnent or declining?
  • Monsanto reduced its research expenditure which
    is about 85 biotech and plant breeding from
    U.S.588 mil in 2000 to 510 mil in 2003 now
    increasing again up 6 in 2004
  • Research is focused on a few major crops

17
Recent econometric research and case studies of
US experience
  • No econometric evidence of concentration reducing
    research or innovation
  • Observed decline probably due to reduce
    expectations of market size
  • Our data up to 2001 may be too early
  • Case studies of patents on research tools found
    little evidence of hold-ups
  • Despite market power farmers capturing most of
    benefits from technology
  • Special issue of Agbioforum 8(23) 2005 on this
    topic

18
Biosafety regulation
  • For much of the developing world the absence of
    a biosafety regulatory framework is a major
    problem.
  • In countries where regulations exist there are
    three problems
  • Times lags and uncertainty about ability to
    obtain approval for commercialization
  • Cost to developers of technology
  • Difficulties in enforcing regulations

19
Several new studies on costs of complying with
regulations
  • It cost US European companies 7 to 15 million
    for the products now on market (Kalaitzandonakes
    2005)
  • It cost companies 2 million more to get Bt
    cotton approved in India
  • 200,000 for Bt cotton in South Africa
  • It cost companies 100,000 to get Bt cotton
    approved in China
  • This is part of the reason why companies
    concentrate on a few blockbuster products

20
Studies also looked at enforcement of regulations
  • In India 2/3rd of Bt cotton is illegal safe but
    illegal
  • China also has had problems with insect resistant
    cotton that was not approved
  • Only tactic that has worked is approving superior
    products which will replace the illegal products

21
Health impacts on consumers and farmers
  • Dr. Hu has shown health impacts of Bt cotton on
    farmers
  • Current transgenic technology safe according to
    Academies of Science in France, US, China, etc
  • Potential health benefits from reducing natural
    toxins in grain

22
Bt white maize in South Africa
  • Statistical association between the mycotoxin
    fumonisin in maize and esophageal cancer in South
    Africa and China
  • Bt maize has less fungus and fumonisin in
    experiment stations
  • Does this translate into reduced exposure to
    small farmers?

23
Spread of GM Crops S.Africa
24
Levels of Fumonisins in Bt Non Bt Maize
Simdlangentsha
25
Levels of Fumonisins in Bt Non Bt Maize
Hlabisa
26
Lessons for moving biotech to the poor supply
side
  • Inexpensive regulations
  • Strong IPRs
  • Sufficiently large commercial market for original
    technology
  • Government pressure on corporations to support
    poor
  • Extension support

27
III. Opportunities for China
28
Opportunities for China
  • Could make more use of available transgenic
    technologies
  • Many useful transgenic technologies developed by
    Big Ag could be easily transferred but are not
    maize, soybeans, RR cotton, RR canola
  • Could use locally developed technology more
    extensively and produce transgenic varieties of
    new crops
  • Chinese scientists have developed technologies
    also transgenic rice
  • Multinationals are not working on most Chinese
    crops the potential market too small but
    Chinese are previous presentation
  • Genomics and molecular breeding are starting to
    be used by public sector

29
Imported technology
  • Chinese farmers can plant
  • transgenic cotton, tomatoes, and pepper and
  • choose between 100 plus varieties of transgenic
    cotton.
  • US farmers can plant
  • transgenic soybeans, maize, cotton and canola to
    choose from
  • Can choose from 1000s of transgenic varieties of
    these crops
  • South African farmer can choose many more crops
    than China

30
Chinese potential to export technology
  • Big Ag has left the playing field open on minor
    crops from rice to millets and vegetables
  • Rice
  • export hybrid rice technology to US in 1980s
  • export hybrid rice seed to Southeast Asia
  • export opportunities for genes and transgenic
    seed if government approve use of transgenic rice
  • Transgenic cotton
  • China is exporting Bt gene to India

31
What is holding China back?
  • Quantity of public sector research is not a
    problem it is Chinas greatest asset
  • Structure may limit production of public goods?
  • Technology transfer expertise limited
  • Controversy over transgenic food discussed by Dr.
    Hu
  • IPR issues
  • Difficulty in enforcing patents and plant
    breeders rights could reduce private technology
    development?
  • Patent on research tools and genes as hold-ups in
    China ?
  • Patent elsewhere could limit exports of Chinese
    genes
  • Biosafety regulatory issues
  • Uncertainty and time lags
  • Enforcement of regulations
  • Lack of harmonization with other countries
    affects exports
  • Structure of seed/biotech industry
  • Restrictions on multinationals limits transfer of
    technology to China
  • Chinese firms are small
  • largest US 30 to 40 million sales (Monsanto
    sales 5 billion)
  • Ownership structure murky most lack modern
    management
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com