Title: Biotechnology: International Diffusion, Recent Findings, and Opportunities for China.
1Biotechnology International Diffusion, Recent
Findings, and Opportunities for China.
- Carl E. Pray
- Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics
- Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
- pray_at_aesop.rutgers.edu
2Main points
- Spread of biotech
- Transgenic varieties (also known as genetically
modified or GMs) continue to spread and have a
major impact on production - Other biotechnologies also important and less
contentious, less known - Empirical results on key issues
- Industry concentration
- Biosafety regulation
- Health impacts
- Transgenics to the poor?
- Opportunities for China
3I. Spread of biotechnology
4Adoption of biotechnology
- Transgenic crops we know a lot because of
controversy - Tissue culture extensively adopted in bananas,
sweet potato, citrus, ornamentals - Genomics and marker aided selection are
increasing productivity of conventional breeding - Livestock few studies BST in US, feed
additives, vaccines and diagnostics (Rinderpest
example)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8Which crops in commercial production?
- Also small areas of potato, squash, papaya,
tomato, green pepper, tobacco, chrysanthemums,
and petunias - NO MAJOR SUBSISTANCE CROP EXCEPT MAIZE
9Which traits in commercial production?
- Also, virus resistance, increased yields, long
shelf life, color, improved cooking oil.
10Summary of economic impact studies
- Insect resistance
- High input agriculture small increase in
yields, large reduction in pesticides, profits up - Low input ag large increases in yields, small
reduction in pesticides, profits up - Herbicide tolerance
- High input agriculture no increase in yields,
reduction in pesticides and less toxic
pesticides, profits up a little, savings in
management - Low input ag studying South Africa now
11Tissue culture and Marker Aided Selection
- Tissue culture
- all commercial banana seedlings to reduce disease
and pests in early stages of growth - All citrus in Sao Paulo to reduce citrus cankor
- Marker aided selection and genomics
- Cut in half breeding times in maize, soybeans,
and cotton in US - Starting to produce new traits in rice in Asia
12II. Recent Empirical Results
13Concentration in the US biotech industry
14Research output US intermediate products
field trials
15Research output US innovations
16Private Biotech/Seed Research
- Dramatic rise until late 1990s
- Since 2000 RD stagnent or declining?
- Monsanto reduced its research expenditure which
is about 85 biotech and plant breeding from
U.S.588 mil in 2000 to 510 mil in 2003 now
increasing again up 6 in 2004 - Research is focused on a few major crops
17Recent econometric research and case studies of
US experience
- No econometric evidence of concentration reducing
research or innovation - Observed decline probably due to reduce
expectations of market size - Our data up to 2001 may be too early
- Case studies of patents on research tools found
little evidence of hold-ups - Despite market power farmers capturing most of
benefits from technology - Special issue of Agbioforum 8(23) 2005 on this
topic
18Biosafety regulation
- For much of the developing world the absence of
a biosafety regulatory framework is a major
problem. - In countries where regulations exist there are
three problems - Times lags and uncertainty about ability to
obtain approval for commercialization - Cost to developers of technology
- Difficulties in enforcing regulations
19Several new studies on costs of complying with
regulations
- It cost US European companies 7 to 15 million
for the products now on market (Kalaitzandonakes
2005) - It cost companies 2 million more to get Bt
cotton approved in India - 200,000 for Bt cotton in South Africa
- It cost companies 100,000 to get Bt cotton
approved in China - This is part of the reason why companies
concentrate on a few blockbuster products
20Studies also looked at enforcement of regulations
- In India 2/3rd of Bt cotton is illegal safe but
illegal - China also has had problems with insect resistant
cotton that was not approved - Only tactic that has worked is approving superior
products which will replace the illegal products
21Health impacts on consumers and farmers
- Dr. Hu has shown health impacts of Bt cotton on
farmers - Current transgenic technology safe according to
Academies of Science in France, US, China, etc - Potential health benefits from reducing natural
toxins in grain
22Bt white maize in South Africa
- Statistical association between the mycotoxin
fumonisin in maize and esophageal cancer in South
Africa and China - Bt maize has less fungus and fumonisin in
experiment stations - Does this translate into reduced exposure to
small farmers?
23Spread of GM Crops S.Africa
24Levels of Fumonisins in Bt Non Bt Maize
Simdlangentsha
25Levels of Fumonisins in Bt Non Bt Maize
Hlabisa
26Lessons for moving biotech to the poor supply
side
- Inexpensive regulations
- Strong IPRs
- Sufficiently large commercial market for original
technology - Government pressure on corporations to support
poor - Extension support
27III. Opportunities for China
28Opportunities for China
- Could make more use of available transgenic
technologies - Many useful transgenic technologies developed by
Big Ag could be easily transferred but are not
maize, soybeans, RR cotton, RR canola - Could use locally developed technology more
extensively and produce transgenic varieties of
new crops - Chinese scientists have developed technologies
also transgenic rice - Multinationals are not working on most Chinese
crops the potential market too small but
Chinese are previous presentation - Genomics and molecular breeding are starting to
be used by public sector
29Imported technology
- Chinese farmers can plant
- transgenic cotton, tomatoes, and pepper and
- choose between 100 plus varieties of transgenic
cotton. - US farmers can plant
- transgenic soybeans, maize, cotton and canola to
choose from - Can choose from 1000s of transgenic varieties of
these crops - South African farmer can choose many more crops
than China
30Chinese potential to export technology
- Big Ag has left the playing field open on minor
crops from rice to millets and vegetables - Rice
- export hybrid rice technology to US in 1980s
- export hybrid rice seed to Southeast Asia
- export opportunities for genes and transgenic
seed if government approve use of transgenic rice - Transgenic cotton
- China is exporting Bt gene to India
31What is holding China back?
- Quantity of public sector research is not a
problem it is Chinas greatest asset - Structure may limit production of public goods?
- Technology transfer expertise limited
- Controversy over transgenic food discussed by Dr.
Hu - IPR issues
- Difficulty in enforcing patents and plant
breeders rights could reduce private technology
development? - Patent on research tools and genes as hold-ups in
China ? - Patent elsewhere could limit exports of Chinese
genes - Biosafety regulatory issues
- Uncertainty and time lags
- Enforcement of regulations
- Lack of harmonization with other countries
affects exports - Structure of seed/biotech industry
- Restrictions on multinationals limits transfer of
technology to China - Chinese firms are small
- largest US 30 to 40 million sales (Monsanto
sales 5 billion) - Ownership structure murky most lack modern
management