Converting List Members into Donors Target User Forum - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Converting List Members into Donors Target User Forum

Description:

1. Converting List Members into Donors. Target User Forum ... Email status valid-emailable, hard-bounced, unsubscribed, etc. Also test: Different packages ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: nten9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Converting List Members into Donors Target User Forum


1
Converting List Members into DonorsTarget User
ForumBoston, April 2008
Defenders of Wildlife Defenders of Wildlife
Action Fund
2
Agenda
  • A little bit about Defenders
  • Background Why convert online
    activists/e-supporters to donors
  • How to convert
  • Case study
  • Measuring ROI

3
Defenders and Online Objectives
  • Defenders of Wildlife - founded 1947
  • 160 total staff
  • 9 Online Marketing and Communications Dept.
    staffwebsites and email
  • Over 620,000 e-supporters
  • 3.2MM raised last FY
  • Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund 501(c)4
    sister organization
  • Objectives of Online Dept.
  • Fundraising
  • Advocacy / Offline Activism
  • Education
  • List Growth
  • Influence elections (501c4, only)

4
Why convert online activists to donors?
Penetrate younger, more affluent audience
Often more satisfied and engaged supporters, too!
5
Background Online activists can become valuable
donors
  • Value from least to most
  • Offline donors without email
  • Offline donors with email
  • Online donors same as offline donors with
    email
  • Online/offline donors
  • Online donors younger (average age 49 vs. 62)
    higher avg income

6
Online gifts larger than offline multi-channel
donors are best
Online avg gift size growing offline almost
constant
Source Defenders of WildlifeJul06-Jun07
7
Acquisition source also a value-driver Better
to acquire online despite slightly lower
retention rates
Data based on Defenders of Wildlife Jul04-Jun05
donors by source
8
Defenders donors are migrating from online to
offline, but not visa versa
  • First-year donorsmade only offline donations in
    2006 (who gave in 2007)
  • 97.7 gave offline only in 2007
  • 2.3 gave online (and in some cases offline) in
    2007
  • ?Problem Often no email addresses for offline
    only donors
  • First-year donorsmade online donation in 2006
    (who gave in 2007)
  • 47 gave offline only in 2007
  • 53 gave online (and in some cases offline) in
    2007
  • ?Online donors converting to offline
  • ?Direct mail (DM)/telemarketing (TM) critical for
    retaining online-acquired donors

9
Question So is it best to convert activists to
donors online?
  • Short answer Probably yes because
  • Lower costs to converting online
  • Larger gifts online
  • Online-acquired donors more valuable
  • Easier to make multi-channel if online donation
    first
  • Longer answer We dont actually know
  • Anyone compared value of online activist whose
    initial donation is online vs. offline?
  • Anyone compared value of a) online activist
    turned donor vs. b) origin offline donor vs. c)
    origin online donor? DOW done a bit
  • Conclusion Most important to convert and
    multi-channel is most powerful so try to convert
    quickly online/TM/DM

10
How to convert activists to donors
  • Solicit
  • Online
  • TM
  • DM
  • Other channels? -)
  • Insufficient testing for firm conclusions, but
    general guidelines
  • Solicit promptlyStrike while iron is hot!
  • Coordinate online/TM/DM
  • Solicit on activist origin issue and/or recent
    issue took action on

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Time to first donation notes
  • Dont give up too soon (online)
  • EOY great time to convert
  • Maybe give up pretty quickly offline
  • More rapid diminishing return on activist names
    offline than other NPO donor lists
  • DM/TM revenue should come in sooner
  • Defenders integration improving so more
    front-loaded offline revenue
  • DM/TM increasingly important over time (e.g.,
    renewal)

16
Activists to offline donors Segment activists
for DM/TM effortsand test packages DM below
17
Defenders segments activists on
  • of actions
  • Recency
  • Interest areas
  • Also considering segmenting on
  • Time on file (shorter for given of actions is
    better)
  • Age
  • Giving to other NPOs
  • Email statusvalid-emailable, hard-bounced,
    unsubscribed, etc.
  • Also test
  • Different packages
  • One-time vs. sustainer
  • Etc.
  • ?Find best criteria to segment, best packages for
    you

18
Defenders experience
  • Some activist segments?Top value donors
  • 31 of new major donors originate thru online
    Join/Renew forms, 10 thru online issues
  • Other activist segments are turkeys
  • Measure each online acquisition source separately
  • Per above, online activist lists may tire quickly
    in DM/TM
  • And DM/TM activist response rates down -(

19
Measuring ROI for online activists
  • is fraught with pitfalls
  • so a few things to consider

20
Basics
  • Include costs of acquiring ALL online activists
    from a given source (and use proxy if acquiring
    through website)
  • Include acquisition costs from ALL sources
  • Hypothetical example for 10k activists after 3
    months
  • Costs
  • Online Source XYZ _at_ 2.50/name 25k
  • 2 DM packages 10k
  • TM for targeted activists 6/call x 500 3k
  • Premium/fulfllment costs
  • Total cost 38k
  • Revenue
  • Online 2 converted _at_ 40 8k
  • DM 3 converted _at_ 20 6k
  • TM (10 monthly x .05) (23 one-time x .03)
    750 345 1.1k
  • Total revs 15.5k
  • 3 month return
  • 5.4 (540) converted to donors including 30
    sustainers
  • ROI negative 59 ROI

21
AdvancedThings to consider
  • If already have name in online file and pay for
    name (again), need to include in acquisition cost
  • If already on offline file and adding email,
    perhaps only add value of online donations,
    thereafter
  • Potential equation for ROI
  • Costs Costs for ALL names including
  • Acquisition for all channels
  • Ongoing DM, TM, premium and fulfillment costs.
    Proxy for eCRM costs?
  • Revenues
  • All revs for unique new names that not previously
    on online/offline DBs
  • PLUS online (only) revs for records that had DM
    address but no email
  • NO revs for records with DM address and email
    even if email different

Revs All revs (new to file) Online revs
(email added to offline record)
22
Discussion and final thoughts
  • Build a great teamProbably 1 key to effective
    cross-channel fundraising and cultivation
  • Contact info jregen_at_defenders.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com