Web Accessibility 2.0: A Holistic Approach What About Interoperability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Web Accessibility 2.0: A Holistic Approach What About Interoperability

Description:

The talk in which we describe how usability and accessibility are only a part of ... 'quality' value='high' param name='bgcolor' value='#FFFFFF' embed src='loader. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: brian89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Web Accessibility 2.0: A Holistic Approach What About Interoperability


1
Web Accessibility 2.0 A Holistic Approach What
About Interoperability?
http//www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/conference
s/ili-2006/masterclass/
Talk 4
  • Brian Kelly
  • UKOLN
  • University of Bath
  • Bath
  • Email B.Kelly_at_ukoln.ac.uk

The talk in which we describe how usability and
accessibility are only a part of providing
effective Web services.
ili-2006-masterclass-kelly tag used in
del.icio.us
UKOLN is supported by
This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonComme
rcial-ShareAlike 2.0 licence (but note caveat)
2
Background
  • Where Are We?
  • So far we have
  • Identified the potential and limitations of tools
  • Recognised the importance of user testing to
    ensure usable accessible Web site
  • Is this sufficient? What about
  • Supporting new devices e.g. mobile devices in an
    environment with pervasive WiFi networks?
  • Access by robots, etc. (e.g. search engines,
    transformation engines, )
  • Repurposing resources
  • Preserving digital resources
  • In addition to usability and accessibility we
    should also be addressing interoperability

3
Supporting New Devices
  • Greater use is being made of devices other than
    PCs
  • PDAs ? Mobile phones
  • Digital TVs ?

4
Repurposing Resources
  • Lessons from the past
  • We use a great technology (e.g. BBC micro, PC, )
    and develop materials for it
  • Something better comes along and our resources
    are trapped in an obsolete technology
  • We develop a great resource but others only
    want to make use of part of the resources
  • What is needed?
  • Device and application independence
  • Ability to
  • Make use of resources 'chunks'
  • Integrate chunks from disparate resources
  • Find relevant chunks (e.g. relevant content,
    appropriate technologies, appropriate rights
    permissions, )

5
Preserving Resources
  • Will our Web sites be able to be preserved
  • To enrich future generations
  • To ensure support for FoI, etc.
  • Internet Archive's Wayback Machine
  • Can show what Web site looked like previously
  • Can help spot problems
  • Can images be captured?
  • Are technologies being used which may cause
    problems for preservation?
  • Are obsolete file formats used?

6
Addressing Interoperability
  • How can we address such interoperability
    challenges?
  • Use of open standards can help to
  • Provide application device independence
  • Future-proof resources and services
  • Use of open standards can help to minimise
    migration costs
  • But need to consider such issues from the start
  • However there may be conflicts with other
    requirements
  • Proprietary formats (e.g. Flash, PDF) may be easy
    to use and satisfy user needs
  • There may be cost and resource implications
  • Open standards may fail to take off
  • The future may not be as expected!

7
Case Study
http//www.weetwood.co.uk/weetwood.html
  • Weetwood Hall
  • Web site for good conference venue
  • Web site is attractive and easy to use
  • But
  • Requires Flash plugin
  • Can't bookmark pages
  • Not HTML text to index
  • One Flash file so individual resources can't be
    reused
  • Text not resizable

8
Need For Clean URLs
http//www.rnib.org.uk/xpedio/groups/public/docume
nts/code/InternetHome.hcsp
http//www.mla.gov.uk/webdav/harmonise?Page/_at_id82
Section5B _at_stateId_eq_left_hand_root5D/_at_id4289
Document/_at_id24343
  • What are the problems with these URLs?
  • Usability Problems
  • Difficult to type
  • May be difficult to find (can Google index it?)
  • Accessibility Problems
  • Difficult to remember
  • Difficult to use if have problems with keyboard
  • Interoperability Problems
  • Dependent on specific CMS
  • Difficult to annotate

See Guidelines For URI Naming Policies, B. Kelly,
Ariadne 31
9
Conclusions
  • To conclude
  • We need to consider interoperability issues
  • Such issues can help
  • Service providers
  • Users of new devices
  • Users of assistive technologies
  • But
  • There may be cost implications
  • Planning will be important
  • End users may seem happy with an
    non-interoperable site

10
Questions
  • Any questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com