WZ Muon Selection For Winter Conferences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

WZ Muon Selection For Winter Conferences

Description:

Identify all 'typical' muons using muon-only information. All muons available in one chunk & All information about them available in that ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: jfrederic
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WZ Muon Selection For Winter Conferences


1
W/Z Muon Selection For Winter Conferences
  • Tom Diehl
  • FNAL
  • _at_ Saclay 12/2001

Tight and Loose Muon selection for the WZ
group
2
Muon Quality
  • Specification and Description of
  • Tight
  • Loose
  • Astub
  • What we have to do for these to be complete
  • What I know
  • What I dont know?
  • W/Z -gt muons selection criteria
  • Ideas I have or have heard that I liked

3
Muon Quality Tight
  • Specification for Tight
  • Identify all typical muons using muon-only
    information
  • All muons available in one chunk All
    information about them available in that chunk or
    from pointers there.
  • Uses the pieces of the muon detector that are
    also used in the L1 trigger
  • Its used now in
  • Reco for Muon-Corrected MET (Quality4)
  • WZ_Reco for streaming from FARM
  • La Macchina for selecting
  • Muon_L3

4
Muon Quality Tight
  • Definition of Tight MuonID
  • Use MuonID chunk
  • NS!hits(A-layer)gt0 (1 _at_ L1)
  • NWhits(A-layer)gt1 (3-4 maximum)
  • NS!hits(BC-layer)gt0 (1 _at_ L1)
  • NWhits(BC-layer)gt2 (23-4 typical, 2-4 not
    unlikely holes )
  • Chi2gt0 (fit converged)
  • I believe it satisfies non-technical part of the
    specifications
  • Tight definition is looser than in Run 1 - we
    can afford that
  • The inner tracker will be a major contributor to
    muon ID, not only making the pT determination but
    also providing remaining background rejection

5
Specification for Loose
  • Identify all muons that can be found with the
    muon detector
  • not intended to be a muon-detector-unbiased
    sample
  • keep in mind holes in the detector coverage and
    typical electronics failures
  • Efficiency of Loose should be reliable with MC
    calculation
  • Loose muons should provide a sample with which
    to measure the efficiency of each component of
    Tight
  • Same technical specifications as for Tight
    i.e.- one chuck - all parameters available there
    or via pointers (we are stuck with tuples through
    winter conferences)

6
Muon Quality Loose
  • Definition of Tight muon MuonID chunk
  • 1a) NS!hits(A-layer)gt0 (1 _at_ L1)
  • 1b) NWhits(A-layer)gt1 (3-4 maximum)
  • 3) NS!hits(BC-layer)gt0 (1 _at_ L1)
  • 4) NWhits(BC-layer)gt2 (23-4 typical, 2-4 not
    unlikely holes )
  • 5) Chi2gt0 (fit converged)
  • A Loose muon can fail one of the above criteria
    except 1a) and 1b) count only as one possible
    failure

Because A-layer scint. and drift chamber holes
are coincident
7
Drift Detectors
8
Scintillation Counters
9
Muon Quality Astubs
  • Specification for Astubs
  • primary Identify muons that dont penetrate the
    toroid magnets
  • 1.1 lt pT(GeV/c) lt 3 or 4 in central
  • 1.1 lt p (GeV/c) lt 3 or 4 in forward
  • secondary Identify muons that miss all of BC
  • Definition (hardly even preliminary)
  • Astub is S!HitsWHits(A-layer)gt1
  • For L3, its probably got overlap with Loose
    and Tight
  • Warning Theres lots of these because of
    background

10
Problems with Quality Definitions
That I know of 15/Dec/2001
  • In p10.13.00 all Tight are available in MuonID
    bank as nseg 3 or -3 (and some of the Loose
    are -3 as well) but Not ALL Loose are
    available in MuonID chunk.
  • Loose must include BC tracks with a pT
    calculated from the vertex (nseg-2) as well as
    those that have a gtrk match (nseg2)
  • Muon Duplication
  • One real muon can occur in the MuonID bankchunk
    up to three (six) times if its in a dense
    region of central tracks, in a jet, perhaps.
  • What else?

11
Muon Isolation Definition
  • Most Physics Groups have agreed to use
    DR(mu-jets0.5)gt0.5 until someone demonstrates
    something better.
  • We havent taken time to reoptimize this since
    Run I
  • Note that central muon phi resolution is pretty
    bad (unless nseg is positive)
  • Note that forward muon phi resolution is pretty
    bad (unless pixels are used in segment)

12
W/Z to Muons Selection
  • Ws Tight Muon plus trackmatch
  • Zs Probably Tight Tight Tight
    Loose and at least one trackmatch.
  • Plus sensible kinematic requirements

13
Some Good Ideas
  • Tight scintillator timing
  • L1 trigger gate is 24 ns wide in central A-Layer.
    Efficiency would remain 99 if this was
    tightened to 18ns in L1 or L3 and probably could
    be tightened more Offline given some careful
    studies
  • Similar comment for all the rest of the
    scintillator
  • Count Decks instead of Hits in performing ID
    (Dave)
  • PDTs MDTs have 3 or 4 decks
  • This is obviously correct.
  • Use the Inner Trackers !!!!!!!!!

14
Some More Good Ideas
  • Locate the beam scraping source in the North
    Tunnel - a hot topic
  • More Shielding in A-Layer - part of upgrade for
    Run 2b
  • Muon unbiased muon
  • I can imagine how we might do this and its
    something to think about six months down the road

15
Summary
  • Ive discussed Tight and Loose muon
    definitions and their specifications
  • W/Z group is applying a Tight muon definition
    and has a working definition for Loose
  • We plan to select postshutdown events based on
    these definitions with the addition of Inner
    Tracker and sensible kinematic information.
  • Good ideas that I have heard

16
Trailer
  • MY Talk Ends Prior to Here

17
W/Z to Muons
  • Single Muon Trigger Rates
  • L4.7e30
  • mu1cmsc_fz 46 (64/108) gt5.8 hz/1030
    (not including octants 5 6)
  • mu1pix_fz 60 hz gt12.8
    hz/1030
  • Readout Bandwidth seems to be 30 hz so single
    muons are getting prescaled heavily

Tighter gates
18
Efficiency Calculation
  • Partly from Monte Carlo.
  • Monte Carlo calculates acceptance kinematic
    selection
  • Monte Carlo doesnt model the detector
    performance
  • Partly from Data
  • Use Data whenever possible
  • See above in reverse for Data

19
Muon Changes I
  • Reported by Frederic last time for p10.11.00
  • muo_trackreco
  • addition of quality word (quality
    4 corresponds to tight)
  • muon_id
  • addition of MuonQualityInfo
  • int Nhit NWA10NWBC1000NSA10000NSBC
  • method muoTrackIndex returns the local track
    index for nseg3 else -1
  • method segIndex returns segment index for
    nseg12 else -1
  • method TightMuoTrack returns T if tight muon
    (used by METcalmu)

20
Muon Changes II
  • Migrating muon selection (e.g. tight loose)
    to Muon_ID
  • Muon_ID
  • nseg -3 criteria changed from NWAgt2 NWBCgt3
    0ltChi2lt1000 NWAgt0 NWBCgt1 -infltChi2ltinf to
    match nseg3 (note it takes 2 hits to make a
    segment)
  • Failed to make an nseg -2 in muon_id because
    theres no BC-only tracks in muo_trackreco
    (Frederic is working on this)

21
Muon Changes II continued
  • Muon_ID Track-Matching
  • nseg 3 trackmatch in Central w/ PT(gtrak)gt3.0
    GeV/c (was 1.5 GeV/c) note its still 1.5 GeV/c
    in Forward note its 3.0 GeV for BC-only
    (nseg2) note its 1.5 GeV/c for Astubs
  • Criteria dZ(A-L.cm) dPhi dEta
  • SMT (100/pt)10 0.5 0.4
  • Global same same same
  • CFT none same none
  • (all now RCP controlled) (was 4)
  • Still, because in Muon_ID we match on A BC
    segments, its possible to have an A-stub or
    BC-seg with a trackmatch in common with an ABC
    muon?
  • Track-matching is done with a CH loop
    (Pt-ordered) priority-ordered by muo_trks,
    BC-segs, Astub-segs

22
Muon L3 Filter
  • What criteria are we going to have available to
    identify muons in L3?
  • We separated muon object from object
    relational criteria and concentrate on the muon
    object to begin with.
  • In step with the offline selection.
  • Providing muons well-matched in selection
    criteria
  • Providing means to measure efficiency
  • Attempting to anticipate the requirements of
    triggers

23
Muon Selection Criteria
First Try
  • Muon_L3(key,Nmu,eta,Region, Quality,PtLocal,TrackM
    atch, PtTrackmatch,CalMatch)
  • key is a marker for relational tools
  • Nmu is the required count
  • eta cut (e.g. eta(muon)lteta)
  • Region (e.g. forward/central)
  • Quality (Tight ,Loose, Astub) based on
    muon criteria more coming up
  • PtLocal (Pt of the muon local track)
  • Trackmatch criteria more coming up
  • PtTrackmatch (Pt of inner tracker)
  • CalMatch criteria not much yet

24
Track Match Criteria
  • Matching with Central Tracks is important for
    muons, especially since we anticipate (and see)
    relatively pure muon triggers.
  • Capability in hand includes global trackmatch via
    best spatial criteria.
  • Paul is expanding the tracking detector options
    and
  • is considering selecting the track with a
    Pt-ordered spatial criteria.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com