AUSTRALIA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

AUSTRALIA

Description:

AUSTRALIA. A Tale of Scheme Amalgamation. Colin Neave. Chief Ombudsman. Background. All firms operating in Australia in the consumer Financial Services market must ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: carolm49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AUSTRALIA


1
  • AUSTRALIA

2
A Tale of Scheme Amalgamation
  • Colin Neave
  • Chief Ombudsman

3
Background
  • All firms operating in Australia in the consumer
    Financial Services market must be licensed by the
    Regulator.
  • A condition of licensing is that the firm is a
    member of a Regulator approved dispute resolution
    scheme.
  • There were seven such schemes, plus a Statutory
    scheme dealing with superannuation, as at 30 June
    2008.
  • All those schemes (and Statutory scheme) shared
    services (IT, Call Centre, etc.) pre 30 June
    2008.
  • No overt Government pressure for scheme
    consolidation. Rather, subtle Government and
    Regulator pressure.

4
Initial Start Up
  • The Boards of the three largest schemes agreed to
    consolidate their operations into FOS from 1 July
    2008.
  • Two smaller schemes came into FOS from 1 January
    2009.
  • Those five schemes have continued to operate
    under pre FOS Terms of Reference, procedures and
    on separate systems but with a common platform.
  • All staff transferred to FOS from 1 July 2008.

5
Initial Start Up Contd/.
  • Ombudsmen heading up the three schemes became FOS
    Ombudsmen from 1 July 2008, with a Chief
    Ombudsman.
  • Single Board with Industry Advisory Committees on
    industry sectors lines established.
  • Drafting of standard Terms of Reference for FOS
    commenced due for completion June 2009.
  • Those Terms of Reference and standard processes
    and procedures will operate from 1 January 2010.

6
Staff/Culture Issues
  • Three largest schemes broadly reflected the
    culture of the different sectors of the
    financial services industry.
  • They did things differently two had casual
    Fridays, they all had different
    starting/finishing times, some encouraged
    part-time employment one did not.
  • Two schemes had ultimate decision-making in the
    hands of a Panel one and the two smaller schemes
    had an Ombudsman decision-making model.
  • Pay rates in one scheme were perceived to be
    superior to those in the other two schemes.
  • Creating a FOS culture has been a challenge.

7
Experience/Advice
  • Do not come together till there is agreement on,
    at least, the essential features of Structure,
    Terms of Reference/Rules and Policies and
    Procedures for the new scheme.
  • Involve staff extensively in that process but a
    single Board/ Ombudsman/Government needs to take
    hard decisions.
  • Settle staffing requirements for the new scheme
    pre merger.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com