Significance in Strategic Management Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Significance in Strategic Management Research

Description:

Counters classical view of predetermining alpha. Simplifies hypothesis testing. ... Neyman-Pearson hypothesis testing with researcher pre-determined alphas. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: stevew92
Learn more at: https://www.bauer.uh.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Significance in Strategic Management Research


1
Significance in Strategic Management Research
Steve Werner Department of Management Bauer
College of Business University of Houston
2
Overview
  • The problems of statistical significance.
  • The solutions.
  • Conclusions.

3
The Problems of Statistical Significance
  • Statistical significance is not practical
    significance.
  • The conventional cut-offs are arbitrary and
    misleading.
  • Frequently occurring Type II errors.

4
Statistical Significance is not Practical
Significance
  • Practical significance is effect size and
    importance.
  • Related but not the same.
  • Statistical significance largely affected by n.

5
Conventional Cut-offs are Arbitrary and Misleading
  • Convention is
  • plt.10 marginally significant
  • plt.05 significant
  • plt.01 highly significant
  • plt.001very highly significant.
  • plt.05 from Fisher (1925).
  • Counters classical view of predetermining alpha.
  • Simplifies hypothesis testing.

6
Frequently OccurringType II Errors
  • Studies conclude no relationship because findings
    not significant.
  • Power issues.
  • This occurs in 60 of all studies (Hunter, 1997).

7
The Solutions
  • Solutions to the practical significance problem.
  • Solutions to the conventional cut-offs problem.
  • Solutions to the frequently occurring Type II
    errors problem.

8
Solutions to the Practical Significance Problem
  • Report confidence intervals.
  • Report effect sizes.
  • Avoiding using significance.
  • Many journals still do not report effect sizes.
  • SMJ 98.5 of studies report effect sizes.

9
Solutions to theArbitrary Cut-off Problem
  • Go back to classical Neyman-Pearson hypothesis
    testing with researcher pre-determined alphas.
  • Report actual p values (Fisher, 1956).
  • Easier to accomplish now.
  • SMJ 13.4 (35/262) of studies report some actual
    p values.

10
Solutions to theType II Error Problem
  • Increase Power
  • Conduct power analyses
  • Increase sample size
  • Increase effect size.
  • Relax alpha.
  • SMJ 65.6 (172/262) of studies use plt.10 as
    cut-off.
  • Report actual p values.

11
(No Transcript)
12
Conclusion
  • The problems of statistical significance.
  • The solutions.
  • Report actual p values.
  • Consider p, power, effect size, sample size, and
    importance when evaluating research findings.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com