Title: Dialect change among Ameland dialect speakers and the island mentality
1Dialect change among Ameland dialect speakers and
the island mentality
- Mathilde M. Jansen, Meertens Instituut.
- Mathilde.Jansen_at_meertens.knaw.nl
2Introduction The Research Area Ameland
3IntroductionThe Research Area Ameland
- One of the five Waddensea islands in The
Netherlands - Population 3.564 inhabitants
- Tourists per year ca. 500.000
- Mixed dialect both Dutch and Frisian elements
- Eastern variety Buren and Nes
- Western variety Ballum and Hollum
4IntroductionOrigin of the Ameland Dialect
- Contact history
- Politics original Frisian island ruled by
officials from the province of Holland - Trading contacts with people from Holland
- Isolated community
- Geographical borders
- Independent developments in the dialect as well
as maintenance of internal variation
5IntroductionThe Identity of the Speaker of the
Ameland Dialect
- A lot of people from Frisia think that because
Ameland is part of their province inhabitants of
the island understand the Frisian language as
well. My girlfriend is Frisian so I can
understand it. But there are a lot of Ameland
people who dont. Still, Frisian people try to
speak Frisian on the island. But most of the time
they get an answer in Ameland dialect. (23-year
old dialect speaker)
6IntroductionThe Identity of the Speaker of the
Ameland Dialect
- They i.e. people from outside of Frisia think
we speak Frisian. That is their first reaction.
It sounds northern and thats why they think its
Frisian. Then my reaction is If I spoke Frisian,
you wouldnt be able to understand me. But when I
speak in Ameland dialect you do understand me.
(52-year old dialect speaker)
7Theoretical partDefinitions
- Dialect levelling the process of the reduction
of both intrasystemic and intersystemic variation - Linguistic convergence a process of languages or
language varieties becoming more similar to one
another - Linguistic divergence change in which languages
or language varieties become more dissimilar
8Theoretical partDefinitions
- Vertical convergence/divergence dynamics in
dialect-standard language dimension - Horizontal convergence/divergence dynamics in
dialect-dialect dimension
9Theoretical partResearch questions
- How is the process of dialect levelling (the
reduction of variation) taking place on the
island of Ameland? - What dialect features are more resistent to
dialect loss and which ones are less? -
- How do social factors as age, gender, identity,
attitude and network influence the dialect
competence of the individual dialect speaker?
10Theoretical partThe current situation
convergence
- Horizontal convergence
- Between western and eastern variety
- Between Ameland and Frisian mainland varieties
- Vertical convergence
- Towards the Dutch standard language
- Towards the Frisian standard language
11Theoretical partThe current situation divergence
- Horizontal divergence
- Between western and eastern variety
- Between Amelands and Frisian varieties (tourists)
- Vertical divergence
- Towards the Dutch standard language
- Towards the Frisian standard language
12Theoretical partLinguistic variables
- A variables typical for the village
- B variables typical for the island
- C variables typical for the region
13Theoretical partThe current situation
convergence
- Horizontal convergence
- Between western and eastern variety
- A-variables disappear
- Between Amelands and other Frisian varieties
- B-variables disappear
- Vertical convergence
- Towards the Dutch standard language
- C-variables disappear
- Towards the Frisian standard language
- B-variables disappear
14Theoretical partThe current situation
(psychological) divergence
- Horizontal divergence
- Between western and eastern variety
- Maintenance of A-variables
- Between Amelands and Frisian varieties (tourists)
- Maintenance of B-variables
- Vertical divergence
- Towards the Dutch standard language
- Maintenance of C-variables
- Towards the Frisian standard language
- Maintenance of B-variables
15Theoretical partGeneral hypotheses
- I In general, language features that are more
wide-spread in geographical space are more
resistent to change than less wide-spread
features. - Ia We therefore expect the eastern and western
varieties to converge, although attitudinal
factors may retard this process
16Theoretical partGeneral hypotheses
- Ib We therefore expect that the regional dialect
features are more resistent to dialect loss than
the typical dialect features. However, the
geographical as well as the psychological borders
that separate the island of Ameland from the
mainland may well disturb this usual procedure.
17Theoretical partHypotheses
- Identity will be a determinant (extralinguistic)
factor in the levelling process - Attitude will be a determinant (extralinguistic)
factor in the levelling process - Network wil be a determinant (extralinguistic)
factor in the levelling process
18Linguistic variablesSelection
- Grammatical component phonology /
morphology - Geographical spread
village / island / region typical - Frequency
- Productivity
19A-variables
village typical
20B-variables
island typical
21C-variables
region typical
22MethodologySubjects
- 60 informants, stratified by age, gender and
geographical origin (all of the informants, as
well as one of their parents, are born and raised
in the village they represent).
23MethodologyQuestionnaires
- Linguistic Questionnaire
- Dialect competence (elicitation tasks)
- Sociolinguistic Questionnaire
- Can-do scales
- Identity
- Attitude
- Dialect use
- Social network
24MethodologyLinguistic questionnaire
- Tasks
- translation (words and sentences)
- completion (words and sentences)
- contrast (words)
- diminutive forms
- plural forms
- judgement
25MethodologySpontaneous data
- From each cell, two or three informants (out of
five) were taken together to have a conversation
on any topic for about an hour. These
conversations were being tape-recorded. - In total 12 conversations have been taped.
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30TIME variable
- Correlation between Dutch variant and factor
age (r0.34, plt0.05) - Eastern variant is used more often in the Eastern
part whereas the Western variant is used more
often in the Western part of the island. - (t(38)7.3, plt0.001) (t(38)4.9, plt0.001)
31(No Transcript)
32OLD variable
- The Eastern and Western variant are strictly
divided, however, acoustic analysis is necessary
to distinguish both variants. - The new variants seems to be used more frequently
in the Eastern part of the island, however, no
significant difference.
33(No Transcript)
34HOUSE variable
- The Dutch variant is used most frequently in west
(t(38)4.3, plt0.001) - The Older variant 1 is used most frequently in
east (t(28.2)5, plt0.001) - The Older variant 2 is used most frequently in
west (t(38)4.8, plt0.001) - The island variant is used most frequently in
east (t(38)2.6, plt0.05) - The new variant is used most frequently in east
(t(24.4)2.1, plt0.05)
35(No Transcript)
36GOAT variable
- The hypercorrect form is used most frequently by
the younger generation (t(32.5)2.2, plt0.05). It
is also used most frequently in west (t(38)3.4,
plt0.01) - The island variant is used most frequently in
east (t(38)3.3, plt0.01). This can be explained
by the existence of this variant in the Eastern
variety in words as TIME.
37HEART variable
38HAND variable
- The Dutch variant is used most frequently in east
(t(38)4.5, plt0.001) - The d/t deletion long vowel is used most
frequently in west (t(38)3, plt0.01), as is d/t
deletion without vowel lengthening (t(38)5.1,
plt0.001) - The long vowel variant is used most frequently by
the younger generation (t(38)2.7, plt0.05)
39ConclusionsA-variables
- Island variants dominate above village typical
variants. - When no such island variant exists a new variant
appears.
40ConclusionsB-variables
- Island variant is dominant
- There is a tendency to adapt to the Dutch
standard which results in intermediate forms - In the case of GOAT the island variant is
probably reinterpreted as an eastern variant
(similar to TIME variant) and that is why it
disappears
41ConclusionsC-variables
- Dutch variants are used in the same amount as the
regional variants - Intermediate forms develop as well
- It is not the case that c-variables, which are
more wide-spread, are less prone to dialect loss.
42Overall conclusions
- Village typical variants are still frequently
used by this generation, however, island variants
seem to replace them. - In cases where no such island variant exists, a
new one is created. - The new variants seem to be intermediate forms,
that is compromises between the dialect and the
Dutch standard language.
43Attitude
44Attitude
45Identity
46Identity
47Dialect change
- When focusing on the newer variants, it is
obvious that most of the innovators are living in
the Eastern part of the island. There is a
significant difference in this respect between
east and west (t(38)2.1, plt0.05). This is what
we would have expected since the Eastern part of
the island has a more open network structure.
What is remarkable is that most innovators are
men. However, it concerns local variants in stead
of supra-local variants.
48Dialect change
- Innovators marginal members of the group with
weak links to more than one group - Early adopters central members of the group
- (Milroy 1992)
49Dialect change
- List of innovators/early adopters
- 1. Thomas YME hotel manager in Nes
- 2. Tiemen OME retired man in Nes - former captain
- member of dialectal committee - - Foppe OME farmer in Nes
- 3. Catherina YFW cafetaria manager in Hollum
50Network analysis
51Summary
- Convergence between the eastern and western
variety becomes visible by the disappearance of
village typical variants and the dominance of
island variants. - The importance of the island identity is shown by
the development of newer variants for variables
that did not have an island variant till now. - Innovators and early adopters are mainly men
since it concerns local variants.