BMC Emergency Medicine Journal Club - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

BMC Emergency Medicine Journal Club

Description:

'But doctor, I always get antibiotics for my sinus infections... The nighttime sniffling, sneezing, coughing, aching, so-you-can-rest antibiotics? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:221
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: markb91
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BMC Emergency Medicine Journal Club


1
BMC Emergency MedicineJournal Club
  • But doctor, I always get antibiotics for my
    sinus infections
  • When are antibiotics needed for acute
    rhinosinusitis?
  • January 2009

2
Todays Agenda
  • Curriculum Topic Head and ENT
  • Morsal Tahouni, MD (EM2)
  • Shane Ruter, MD (EM1)

BMC EM Journal Club
BMC EM Journal Club
3
BMC Emergency MedicineJournal Club
  • But doctor, I always get antibiotics for my
    sinus infections
  • When are antibiotics needed for acute
    rhinosinusitis?
  • Shane Ruter, MD
  • January 2009

BMC EM Journal Club
4
Got sinusitis?
5
Supportive Therapy
  • Reassurance
  • Oral decongestants
  • Topical decongestants
  • Saline nasal spray
  • Antihistamines
  • Mucolytics

6
  • The nighttime sniffling, sneezing, coughing,
    aching, so-you-can-rest antibiotics?

ANTIBIOTICS
7
J Fam Pract 200554144-151
8
Background
  • 31 million people annually
  • Fifth most common diagnosis for which antibiotics
    are prescribed in outpatient settings
  • 1 in 5 antibiotic prescriptions
  • 6 billion spent annually on prescription and OTC
    medications

9
Objective 1
  • To determine whether patients with sinusitis-like
    symptoms improved with antibiotics
  • Null hypothesis antibiotics placebo

10
Objective 2
  • To test the validity of a clinical prediction
    rule
  • At least 3 out of 4 cardinal clinical features
  • (1) One-sided purulent nasal discharge
  • (2) One-sided local facial pain
  • (3) Bilateral purulent nasal discharge
  • (4) Pus in the nasal cavity
  • 76 sensitivity, 79 specificity

11
Methods
  • Population
  • Recruited from a suburban primary care office
  • Enrolled from Oct 1, 2001 March 31, 2003
  • At least 1 cardinal feature of clinical
    prediction rule
  • At least 7 days of symptoms
  • Exclusion criteria
  • Children (lt 18 years) prior h/o antibiotic
    treatment (past month), allergy to PCN, sinus
    surgery, pneumonia, streptococcal pharyngitis,
    compromised immunity

12
Methods
  • Exposure and Control
  • Amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily or placebo taken
    for 10 days

13
Methods
  • Outcome (1) improved vs not improved by 2
    weeks
  • On what day were you entirely improved?
  • Rates of improvement (Kaplan-Meier curve)
  • Patients self-rating (Likert scores)
  • Outcome (2) Clinical Prediction Rule
  • Do more signs and symptoms (i.e., 3 or 4 cardinal
    features) show differences in clinical outcome?

14
Results
  • Primary Outcome Complete improvement in 32 (48)
    amoxicillin group compared with 25 (37) placebo
    group (P0.26) after 2 weeks

15
Figure Kaplan-Meier curve for improvementamoxici
llin (n67) vs placebo (n68)
16
Table 2 Likert scoresHow sick do you feel
today?
Likert score of 1 represents perfect health to
10 representing worst condition data shown
represent mean and standard deviation (SD) NS,
Not Significant
17
Table 3 Clinical Prediction Rule
Mean number of days to improvement by group and
number of signs and (at baseline) for patients
who improved
Signs and symptoms are purulent nasal discharge
predominating on 1 side, local facial pain
predominating on 1 side, purulent nasal discharge
on both sides, and pus in the naval cavity
18
Authors Conclusion
  • Overall antibiotics offered no greater
    improvement in patients with sinusitis-like
    symptoms
  • However, among those who improved, there may
    exist a subset of patients for whom antibiotics
    may be beneficial

19
Strengths of Article
  • Study design
  • Blinded personnel conducting follow-up
  • Clinical improvement as a primary outcome
  • Intention-to-treat analysis
  • Study groups are compared in terms of the
    treatment to which they are randomly allocated,
    irrespective of the treatment they actually
    receive
  • Preserves the value of randomization and
    minimizes bias

20
Limitations of Article
  • Determining primary outcome and its endpoint
  • Limited power to find differences between groups
    based on the number of signs and symptoms
  • Single study site

21
Further Questions
  • Inter-rater variability (e.g., detecting purulent
    nasal discharge)
  • Assessment of outcomes
  • What were the twelve follow-up questions asked?
  • What other sinusitis treatments did the patients
    get?

22
Survey Results Part I
  • Results
  • No respondent would prescribe antibiotics at 2
    days
  • 1 respondent would prescribe antibiotics at 8
    days
  • One-third would prescribe antibiotics at 15 days
  • Most respondents prescribe some form of
    symptomatic relief (decongestant or nasal
    saline)

23
3 out of 4 Joes!
24
BMC Emergency MedicineJournal Club
  • But doctor, I always get antibiotics for my
    sinus infections
  • When are antibiotics needed for acute
    rhinosinusitis?
  • Morsal Tahouni, MD
  • January 2009

BMC EM Journal Club
25
Arch Intern Med 20031631793
26
Background
  • Acute rhinosinusitis is one of the most common
    diagnoses and most frequent reasons for
    prescribing antibiotics in general practice
  • Lack of simple diagnostic test
  • Few studies that reflect routine clinical
    practice
  • Unclear benefit of antibiotics
  • Complicated by
  • Viral etiology
  • High rate of spontaneous resolution (80)
  • Patient requests
  • Antibiotic resistance

27
Objective
  • To assess effects of antibiotic treatment in
    uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis in the general
    practice setting
  • Intervention
  • Augmentin 875mg/125mg bid for 6 days
  • Null hypothesis antibiotics placebo

28
Methods
  • Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomized
    Trial
  • Enrollment Adult patients during winter months
    in Switzerland -November 1 to April 30 1997 to
    2001
  • Repeated purulent nasal discharge, sinus pain for
    48 hours
  • Pus under rhinoscopy (subject to change)
  • Excluded
  • lt18 years old
  • Fever, URI, or antibiotic use in the last 4 weeks
  • Immuno-compromised
  • History of ENT pathology
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • No German, French, Italian and Romansh fluency

29
Methods II
  • Baseline clinical exam with questionnaire
  • Rhinoscopy by trained physician
  • Sinus x-ray, C-reactive protein, and WBC obtained
  • Randomized in blocks of 6
  • Antibiotic and placebo group
  • All subjects received xylometazolin and
    acetaminophen
  • Follow-up
  • Repeat exam at 7 days
  • Telephone interview at 14 and 28 days

30
Methods III
  • 1o Outcome Time to cure (days)
  • Restriction of Activities
  • 1 to 10 scale
  • 2o Outcomes
  • Number of days restricted activity
  • Adverse events
  • Recurrence at 28 days

31
Key Results
  • 1565 eligible
  • 252 randomized
  • 68 women
  • No significant difference between groups
  • Two subgroups
  • Positive rhinoscopy
  • Restriction of activities at baseline

32
Key Results
  • No significant difference in time to cure
  • HR 0.99 (CI 0.68 to1.45)
  • Same findings in subgroups

33
Hazard Ratio (HR)
  • The risk of an individual reaching a certain
    event (hazard) at any point in time
  • In other words, similar to odds ratio
  • i.e. if I drove this car, HR for speeding ticket
    would be gtgt1.0

34
Key Results
  • No difference in days of restriction in any group
  • No difference in recurrence at 28 days
  • Increased diarrhea in treatment group at 7 and 14
    days
  • Trend towards increase in other adverse events

35
Authors Conclusion
  • No difference in time to cure
  • Treatment group more likely to have adverse events

36
Study Strengths
  • Double-blind, placebo-controlled, random
  • High follow-up rate (98)
  • Replicated clinical setting
  • High number of sites (24)

37
Strength - Disclosure
38
Study Limitations
  • Authors
  • 1o outcome insensitive
  • Only one follow-up visit
  • Other follow-up by phone
  • Low prevalence of bacterial etiology
  • Ignored 7-day guideline
  • Changed inclusion criteria
  • Mine
  • 433 subjects not included for other reasons
  • Diarrhea at 14 days
  • Confidence interval includes 1.0
  • Enrollment only during winter months

39
Further Questions
  • What was the enrollment per site?
  • Average enrollment per site 2.4/year
  • What about the 3rd subgroup symptoms for 7
    days?
  • Are there other clinical diagnostic methods
    available?

40
Survey Results
  • Enrollment 9 attendings, 5 residents
  • Results
  • No one would prescribe antibiotics at 2 days
  • 21 would prescribe antibiotics at 8 days
  • 22 attendings, 20 residents
  • 71 would prescribe antibiotics at 15 days
  • 89 attendings, 40 residents

41
Final Comments
  • Study supports current practice patterns
    regarding utility of early antibiotics for acute
    rhinosinusitis
  • Further studies could focus on
  • Best time to prescribe antibiotics
  • Isolating 20 of cases that will not resolve with
    supportive care

42
Upcoming Journal Clubs
  • February 10 Hematology
  • David Meguerdichian (EM2)
  • Nadia Huancahuari (EM1)
  • March 10 Immune Disorders Lopez and Dresden
  • April 14 Infectious Disorders Levenberg and
    DeLong

BMC EM Journal Club
BMC EM Journal Club
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com