Chapters 56 Richards text Chapter 8 first half Cooper text Reversal aka Withdrawal Designs in Single - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapters 56 Richards text Chapter 8 first half Cooper text Reversal aka Withdrawal Designs in Single

Description:

AB = baseline intervention. ABA = baseline ... Designs: The AB 'design' ... a functional relationship (otherwise you can use the AB design) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: kre52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapters 56 Richards text Chapter 8 first half Cooper text Reversal aka Withdrawal Designs in Single


1
Chapters 5-6 (Richards text)Chapter 8 (first
half) (Cooper text) Reversal (a/k/a Withdrawal)
Designs in Single-Subject Research
  • Ps534
  • Dr. Ken Reeve
  • Caldwell College
  • Graduate Programs in ABA

2
Single-Case Experimental Designs
  • Traditionally called single-subject designs
  • Now referred to as single-case and
    single-participant designs
  • Historical tradition Behavior Analysis
  • Techniques and logic applied to other research
    areas
  • If done well, is a perfectly valid research
    design

3
Single-Case Experimental Designs Terminology
  • AB baseline ? intervention
  • ABA baseline ? intervention ? baseline
  • ABAB baseline ? intervention ? baseline ?
    intervention
  • BAB intervention ? baseline ? intervention

4
Single-Case Experimental Designs Issues
  • For each design we will ask the following
  • Does the design allow us to see a change in DV
    (without regard to whether it was caused by the
    IV)?
  • Does the design allow us to infer a functional
    relationship between IV and DV? Why does it
    allows this?
  • What threats to internal validity (confounds)
    does the design control for?
  • What ethical issues are important to know about
    using a particular design?

5
Single-Case Experimental Designs The AB design
6
Single-Case Experimental Designs The AB design
  • Does the design allow us to see a change in DV
    (without regard to whether it was caused by the
    IV)? YES
  • Does the design allow us to infer a functional
    relationship between IV and DV? NO. Why DOESNT
    it allows this?
  • What threats to internal validity (confounds)
    does the design control for? NONE
  • Ethical issues?

7
The ABA Withdrawal (Reversal)
8
The ABA Withdrawal (Reversal)
  • Does the design allow us to see a change in DV
    (without regard to whether it was caused by the
    IV)? YES
  • Does the design allow us to infer a functional
    relationship between IV and DV? YES.
  • Why DOES it allows this? IF ONLY IV IS
    MANIPULATED, THEN NOT LIKELY ANYTHING BUT IV
    CAUSED CHANGES IN DV
  • What threats to internal validity (confounds)
    does the design control for? MATURATION HISTORY
  • Ethical issues? BETTER BECAUSE IT ENDS ON
    TREATMENT

9
The ABAB Withdrawal (Repeated Reversal)
10
The ABAB Withdrawal (Repeated Reversal)
  • Does the design allow us to see a change in DV
    (without regard to whether it was caused by the
    IV)? DUH
  • Does the design allow us to infer a functional
    relationship between IV and DV? YES, EVEN BETTER
    THAN THE ABA DESIGN.
  • Why DOES it allows this? IF ONLY IV IS
    MANIPULATED, THEN NOT LIKELY ANYTHING BUT IV
    CAUSED CHANGES IN DV
  • What threats to internal validity (confounds)
    does the design control for? MATURATION HISTORY
  • Ethical issues? ENDS ON BASELINE

11
The ABABABAB Withdrawal (Repeated Reversal)
12
When to Use the ABAB Withdrawal (Repeated
Reversal)
  • When you need to observe a functional
    relationship (otherwise you can use the AB
    design)
  • When the effects of IV (intervention) do not
    remain in the DV
  • When ethics allow this design. If it is NOT
    ethical to remove treatment, then dont use a
    withdrawal design

13
Adaptations of Withdrawal designs BAB design
  • Better from an ethical standpoint because client
    or learner gets intervention right away and ends
    on treatment
  • Worse than ABA design from a control standpoint
    because we dont know pre-intervention levels
    (BAB has slightly lower internal validity than
    ABA)

14
Adaptations of Withdrawal designs ABC (Changing
Conditions) design
  • Used when treatment B tanks and you switch to a
    new treatment C
  • Introduces an unwanted possible confound of
    order/sequence effects (Maybe C only works if it
    follows B!)
  • Has poor internal validity but is very similar to
    how we provide treatment in real world.
  • Can be improved if we use(see next)gtgt

15
Adaptations of Withdrawal designs ABAC
(Multiple Treatments) design
  • Allows better chance to see functional
    relationship
  • Has better internal validity
  • Can be improved even more if we use ABACA (with
    added C phase)

16
End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com