Title: Chapters 56 Richards text Chapter 8 first half Cooper text Reversal aka Withdrawal Designs in Single
1Chapters 5-6 (Richards text)Chapter 8 (first
half) (Cooper text) Reversal (a/k/a Withdrawal)
Designs in Single-Subject Research
- Ps534
- Dr. Ken Reeve
- Caldwell College
- Graduate Programs in ABA
2Single-Case Experimental Designs
- Traditionally called single-subject designs
- Now referred to as single-case and
single-participant designs - Historical tradition Behavior Analysis
- Techniques and logic applied to other research
areas - If done well, is a perfectly valid research
design
3Single-Case Experimental Designs Terminology
- AB baseline ? intervention
- ABA baseline ? intervention ? baseline
- ABAB baseline ? intervention ? baseline ?
intervention - BAB intervention ? baseline ? intervention
4Single-Case Experimental Designs Issues
- For each design we will ask the following
- Does the design allow us to see a change in DV
(without regard to whether it was caused by the
IV)? - Does the design allow us to infer a functional
relationship between IV and DV? Why does it
allows this? - What threats to internal validity (confounds)
does the design control for? - What ethical issues are important to know about
using a particular design?
5Single-Case Experimental Designs The AB design
6Single-Case Experimental Designs The AB design
- Does the design allow us to see a change in DV
(without regard to whether it was caused by the
IV)? YES - Does the design allow us to infer a functional
relationship between IV and DV? NO. Why DOESNT
it allows this? - What threats to internal validity (confounds)
does the design control for? NONE - Ethical issues?
7The ABA Withdrawal (Reversal)
8The ABA Withdrawal (Reversal)
- Does the design allow us to see a change in DV
(without regard to whether it was caused by the
IV)? YES - Does the design allow us to infer a functional
relationship between IV and DV? YES. - Why DOES it allows this? IF ONLY IV IS
MANIPULATED, THEN NOT LIKELY ANYTHING BUT IV
CAUSED CHANGES IN DV - What threats to internal validity (confounds)
does the design control for? MATURATION HISTORY - Ethical issues? BETTER BECAUSE IT ENDS ON
TREATMENT
9The ABAB Withdrawal (Repeated Reversal)
10The ABAB Withdrawal (Repeated Reversal)
- Does the design allow us to see a change in DV
(without regard to whether it was caused by the
IV)? DUH - Does the design allow us to infer a functional
relationship between IV and DV? YES, EVEN BETTER
THAN THE ABA DESIGN. - Why DOES it allows this? IF ONLY IV IS
MANIPULATED, THEN NOT LIKELY ANYTHING BUT IV
CAUSED CHANGES IN DV - What threats to internal validity (confounds)
does the design control for? MATURATION HISTORY - Ethical issues? ENDS ON BASELINE
11The ABABABAB Withdrawal (Repeated Reversal)
12When to Use the ABAB Withdrawal (Repeated
Reversal)
- When you need to observe a functional
relationship (otherwise you can use the AB
design) - When the effects of IV (intervention) do not
remain in the DV - When ethics allow this design. If it is NOT
ethical to remove treatment, then dont use a
withdrawal design
13Adaptations of Withdrawal designs BAB design
- Better from an ethical standpoint because client
or learner gets intervention right away and ends
on treatment - Worse than ABA design from a control standpoint
because we dont know pre-intervention levels
(BAB has slightly lower internal validity than
ABA)
14Adaptations of Withdrawal designs ABC (Changing
Conditions) design
- Used when treatment B tanks and you switch to a
new treatment C - Introduces an unwanted possible confound of
order/sequence effects (Maybe C only works if it
follows B!) - Has poor internal validity but is very similar to
how we provide treatment in real world. - Can be improved if we use(see next)gtgt
15Adaptations of Withdrawal designs ABAC
(Multiple Treatments) design
- Allows better chance to see functional
relationship - Has better internal validity
- Can be improved even more if we use ABACA (with
added C phase)
16End