The Bath Profile and The Journey To Interoperability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Bath Profile and The Journey To Interoperability

Description:

Records that don't obviously meet the search criteria. Miss records that are in ... Propose to discontinue development of CENL profile. Develop European annex ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: nlc8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Bath Profile and The Journey To Interoperability


1
The Bath ProfileandThe Journey To
Interoperability
  • Carrol D Lunau
  • Bath Profile Maintenance Agency
  • July 7, 2003
  • carrol.lunau_at_nlc-bnc.ca

2
Z39.50 Searching what are the difficulties?
  • Large result sets
  • Records that dont obviously meet the search
    criteria
  • Miss records that are in the database
  • Difficulties configuring clients for each server

3
Why is a profile needed?
  • Z39.50 implementation options
  • Different implementer interpretations of the
    standard
  • Result User frustration

4
What is a Profile?
  • Represents community consensus on requirements
  • Identifies Z39.50 specifications to support those
    requirements
  • Improves search retrieval results
  • Aids in purchasing decisions
  • Provides specifications for vendors to build
    Z39.50 products
  • Makes client configuration easier

5
Role of the Bath Profile
  • Provides a core specification for global
    interoperability of Z39.50 servers
  • National/regional profiles can build on Bath for
    local requirements
  • Objective to increase predictability precision
    in searching library catalogues when desired by
    the searcher

6
Development of the Bath Profile
  • Lengthy process to reach international consensus
  • August 1999 first meeting
  • March 2000 Release 1.0
  • June 2000 Release 1.1 (Internationally Registered
    Profile)
  • March 2003 Release 2.0
  • Has been re-submitted to ISO

7
Features of the Bath Profile
  • Groups related functions requirements into
    functional areas
  • Provides 3 levels of conformance
  • Modular, can implement all or only specific
    functions
  • Must use all 6 use attributes for searches

8
Release 1.1
  • Three functional areas
  • A Basic bibliographic search retrieval
  • 2 levels of conformance, 19 searches 6 scans
  • B Bibliographic holdings search retrieval
  • Not really defined
  • C Cross-domain search retrieval
  • 2 levels of conformance, 13 searches

9
Release 2.0
  • Four functional areas
  • A Bibliographic search retrieval
  • 3 levels of conformance, 29 searches, 3 scans
  • B Bibliographic holdings retrieval search
  • 2 levels of conformance, 3 ESNs for retrieval
  • C Cross-domain search retrieval
  • 2 levels of conformance, 13 searches
  • D Authority record search retrieval in online
    library catalogues
  • 2 levels of conformance, 54 searches, 6 scans

10
Changes Level 0 Bibliographic Search Retrieval
  • Author search precision match for established
    name heading
  • Deleted
  • Author search keyword
  • Moved to level 0 from level 1

11
Changes Level 1 Bibliographic Search Retrieval
  • Author searching
  • Keyword moved to level 0
  • Precision match for established name heading with
    right truncation deleted
  • New search for first words in field
  • New search for first characters in field
  • SCAN
  • Title, Subject and Any keyword scans deleted

12
Changes Functional Area A syntax specifications
  • Requirement for UNIMARC dropped but encouraged
  • Z-client required to support MARC21 SUTRS
  • Z-server required to support MARC21

13
Other changes
  • Decided not to reference future work
  • Deleted Functional Area B Level 2
  • Deleted Appendix A Use of new attribute sets in
    expressing selected searches
  • Documents moved to Z39.50 Maintenance Agency
  • Appendix B Diagnostics
  • Appendix E Creating a search from Scan results
  • Functional Area C created ESN for the dtd for
    Dublin Core Simple
  • GRS-1 replaced by XML in Functional Area B

14
Clarifications
  • Use of Term and DisplayTerm
  • Z-clients must support Term and DisplayTerm and
    display DisplayTerm if sent. If DisplayTerm is
    not sent, Term must be displayed
  • How terms field subfield are used
  • Character sets
  • If a character set is not negotiated the server
    should assume that the character set is ISO
    Latin-1
  • Explanation of how conformant targets should
    handle requests from non-conformant clients

15
New Level 2 bibliographic search retrieval
  • 10 searches
  • Key title search
  • keyword
  • keyword with right truncation
  • exact match
  • first words in field
  • first characters in field
  • Format/Type of material search
  • keyword
  • phrase
  • Language search keyword
  • Date of publication range search
  • Possessing institution search

16
New Bibliographic holdings retrieval search
  • Based on work by NISO and DanZIG
  • Can conform to level 1 without conforming to
    level 0
  • Level 1 conformance requires
  • XML record syntax
  • Holdings schema
  • Support of ESN B-1 and ESN B-2 or ESN C-2
  • Version 3 Z39.50

17
New Bibliographic holdings retrieval search
  • 3 Element Set Names with XML schema definitions
  • B-1 BathHoldingsLocationsOnly
  • Intended for centralized union catalogues that
    only keep title level holdings
  • Can include a symbol and/or name
  • B-2 BathHoldingsSummaryInfo
  • Intended for union catalogues and catalogues that
    only include summary information for serials
    multi-part titles
  • C-2 BathHoldingsCopyInfo
  • Intended for virtual union catalogues
    individual catalogues with copy level information
    can include circulation information

18
New Authority record search retrieval
  • Searches in indexes containing access points or
    cross references
  • Specifications virtually identical to bib search
    but different attributes
  • Level 1
  • 14 searches, 3 scans
  • Level 2
  • 39 searches, 3 scans
  • Parallels bibliographic search and cross-domain
    search specifications

19
Related profiles
  • North America
  • Z39.89 200x The U.S. National Z39.50 Profile
    for Library Applications
  • Z Texas Profile Release 2.0
  • Europe
  • CENL
  • ONE-2 Profile v.2 rev.5

20
Z39.89 200x - highlights
  • Has been approved is being prepared for
    publication
  • Only Bibliographic search retrieval at this
    time but working on holdings as well
  • Level 0 searches the same
  • Level 1 includes the 15 Bath searches adds 4
    others
  • 3 new ISBN, ISSN remote system number
  • One, language, is Bath level 2

21
Z39.89 200x - highlights
  • Level 1 scan identical
  • Level 2
  • Includes 7 of the 10 Bath searches
  • Language is level 2 Bath level 1 in Z39.89
  • Different searches for format type of material
  • Z39.89 defines 2 keyword searches provides a
    list of codes to use to identify the format
  • Bath combines format type of material in one
    search with both keyword phrase searches
    doesnt specify codes
  • 40 additional searches, including controlled
    vocabulary pattern searches
  • Includes an appendix giving examples of
    profile-defined searches

22
Z Texas
  • Have adopted Bath version 1.1
  • Have added detailed indexing guidelines
  • Are developing specifications for search
    retrieval from abstracting indexing systems

23
CENL
  • Propose to discontinue development of CENL
    profile
  • Develop European annex
  • Syntax MARC21 UNIMARC
  • Z39.50 version 3 to support search terms from
    different attribute sets

24
Bath Profile Implementation
  • Z39.50 interoperability testbed
  • Test scripts
  • Have tested clients
  • Fretwell-Downing ZPORTAL
  • Have tested integrated library systems including
  • Dynix
  • OCLC
  • Inquirion, TeraText
  • III
  • TLC/CARL
  • Middlesex University

25
Interoperability are we there yet?
  • No

26
What do we still need?
  • Implementation of the profile
  • Address indexing issues
  • Do the necessary indexes exist?
  • Is the attribute to MARC tag mapping the same?
  • Semantic issues with the data
  • Initial articles
  • Stop-word lists
  • Language character set negotiation

27
Future of the Bath Profile
  • Short term
  • ISO IRP
  • Modifications based on implementation
  • Medium term
  • Holdings searching
  • New attribute architecture
  • Version 3 Z39.50
  • Specifications for search retrieval of A I
    systems
  • Long term
  • Metasearching Z39.50
  • Will Z39.89 make Bath redundant?

28
Conclusions
  • Bath release 2.0 has simplified some
    specifications from release 1.1 and added
    significant functionality
  • Progress is slower than we hoped
  • The need for interoperability is not going to go
    away - Just do it!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com