Identifying and Valuing NonMarket Outputs Provided by Multifunctional HouseholdFirms PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 25
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Identifying and Valuing NonMarket Outputs Provided by Multifunctional HouseholdFirms


1
Identifying and Valuing Non-Market Outputs
Provided by Multifunctional Household-Firms
  • David AblerPennsylvania State UniversityUSA

2
Outline of Presentation
  • The Concept of Multifunctionality
  • The Complete Household-Firm and
    Multifunctionality
  • Principal Research Questions Surrounding
    Multifunctionality
  • Techniques for Valuing Non-Market Outputs
  • Special Focus on Landscape and Open Space
    Amenities, with Emphasis on Data Collection Needs

3
What Is Multifunctionality?
  • An economic activity may have multiple outputs,
    some sold on markets and others not sold
  • The market and non-market outputs are jointly
    produced (though not in fixed proportions)
  • Some of the non-market outputs exhibit the
    characteristics of externalities or public goods
  • Multifunctionality is not specific to agriculture

4
Beneficial Non-Market Outputs in Agriculture
  • Landscape and Open Space Amenities
  • Cultural Heritage
  • Rural Employment and Rural Economic Viability
  • Enhanced Food Security
  • Prevention of Natural Hazards (Floods,
    Landslides)
  • Groundwater Resource Recharge
  • Preservation of Biodiversity
  • Sequestration of Greenhouse Gases

5
Negative Externalities in Agriculture
  • Loss of Biodiversity
  • Water Pollution from Nutrients and Erosion
  • Human Health Threats from Pesticides and Animal
    Wastes
  • Animal Welfare
  • Irrigation Overuse, Salinization
  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions

6
The Complete Household-Firm and Multifunctionality
  • Farm households are producers and consumers of
    beneficial non-market outputs
  • Farm households are affected as consumers by
    negative externalities
  • A farm household can be affected by
  • Its own non-market outputs and negative
    externalities
  • Non-market outputs and negative externalities
    generated by other farm households
  • Farm household preferences do not align with
    preferences of society at large

7
The Complete Household-Firm and
Multifunctionality (Continued)
  • Most beneficial non-market outputs are provided
    by small farms
  • But most negative externalities are produced by
    large farms
  • Farms closest to urban areas (and thus most of
    the social demand for non-market outputs) are
    small farms
  • The behavior of small (and large) farms cannot be
    understood outside of the complete household-firm

8
OECD Research Questions on Multifunctionality
  • Is there a strong degree of jointness between
    agricultural commodity production and non-market
    outputs?
  • If answer to 1 is yes is there a market
    failure associated with production of a
    non-market output?
  • If answer to 2 is yes is government action
    required?
  • What are the effects of agricultural policy
    reform and trade liberalization on non-market
    outputs?

9
The Question of Jointness
  • Is the degree of jointness with agricultural
    production strong or weak?
  • Where there is strong jointness, is it national
    in scale, regional, or local?
  • To what extent is jointness a function of the
    farming system rather than the intensity of
    production?
  • Is it possible to de-link market and non-market
    outputs? At what effectiveness and cost?

10
The Issue of Market Failure
  • Is there a market failure or merely the absence
    of demand (and thus a market)?
  • What valuation techniques are appropriate for
    estimating demand for non-market outputs in
    agriculture?
  • Are demands national in scale, regional, or
    local?
  • Can valuation studies produce sufficiently
    reliable estimates?
  • Marginal effects
  • Accounting for substitution effects

11
The Issue of Government Action
  • Which non-market outputs could be provided
    through market mechanisms?
  • Which could be provided by community or
    environmental organizations?
  • If government action is required, what is the
    appropriate level of government (local, regional,
    or national)?
  • In trying to cure market failure, how can we
    avoid policy failure?

12
Agricultural Policy Reform and Trade
Liberalization
  • Will reforms intensify or extensify agricultural
    production?
  • Will agricultural land be abandoned or converted
    to nonagricultural uses?
  • What will happen to farm employment and labor
    devoted to non-market outputs?
  • What will happen to farm size, structure, and in
    turn non-market outputs?
  • What will happen to usage of environmentally
    harmful inputs?

13
Research Findings to Date Negative Externalities
  • Strong consensus here negative externalities
    joint with production to at least some extent
  • Most options for partially de-linking negative
    externalities involve reducing the intensity of
    production
  • Agricultural policy reforms would reduce negative
    externalities in most OECD countries

14
Research Findings to Date Beneficial Non-Market
Outputs
  • Jointness with agricultural production per se is
    generally weak
  • What matters more are the existence of
    agriculture, land use practices, and agricultural
    structures
  • Little research to date on options for partial
    de-linking and non-agricultural provision
  • Research on valuation has been limited and
    results vary widely

15
Valuation Techniques for Non-Market Outputs
  • Methods Based on Individual Preferences
  • Revealed preference techniques
  • Stated preference techniques
  • Methods Based on Opinions of Decision-Makers or
    Experts
  • Methods Based on Public Policy Choices
  • Revealed political preference analysis
  • Simulated voting/town meeting techniques

16
Revealed Preference Techniques
  • Household Production Function (HPF) Approach
  • Travel Cost Method
  • Averting Costs / Replacement Costs
  • Hedonic Price Analysis
  • Simulated Markets

17
Stated Preference Techniques
  • Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)
  • Open-ended format
  • Discrete-choice format
  • Choice Experiments
  • Either/or format
  • Contingent ranking format
  • Conjoint Analysis

18
Landscape Open Space Amenities What Do People
Value?
  • Open Space
  • The absence of development (congestion,
    pollution)
  • Protection of wildlife habitat
  • Landscapes
  • Agricultural structures (barns, farmhouses, stone
    walls, hedges, canals, terraces, etc.)
  • Topographical variation
  • Colorful fields and meadows
  • Variations in color and texture of vegetation
  • Bodies of water (lakes, streams, rivers, etc.)
  • Scenes of tranquility (e.g. cows in Swiss Alps)

19
Implications for Data Collection
  • Collect data on what people value
  • Give priority to collecting data in areas where
    landscape and open space amenities are most
    important
  • Ensure that landscape data can be integrated with
    socioeconomic data
  • Matching data on a farm-by-farm basis
  • Layering data within a GIS framework

20
Current Data (USA) Primarily Land Cover and Use
  • Satellite (Landsat) Imagery
  • Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MLRC)
    Consortium
  • Land Sample Surveys
  • National Resources Inventory (NRI)
  • Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA)
  • National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
  • Census and Census-Like Approaches
  • Census of Agriculture
  • Detailed local land use data (most urban areas,
    some other areas)

21
Limitations of Current Satellite Imagery
  • Land use categories are rough
  • Land can be misclassified into the wrong category
  • No data below a 30- or 15-meter resolution
  • Virtually no data on agricultural structures

22
Limitations of Current Land Sample Surveys
  • A point of land does not a landscape make
  • Sampling density is too low for reliable county
    or sub-county estimates in most cases
  • Surveys are not done frequently enough to track
    rapid land use changes
  • Virtually no data on agricultural structures

23
Limitations of Existing Census Data
  • Focus of the Census is on production, not
    non-market outputs
  • Data on structures is not suitable from a
    landscape amenities perspective
  • Land use and management practices are not broken
    down by farm field
  • Census is every 5 years not frequent enough to
    track rapid land use changes

24
Concluding Messages
  • Understanding the complete household-firm is
    essential to understanding multifunctionality
  • There are important unanswered research questions
  • These questions cannot be answered without better
    data
  • Even with better data, valuing non-market outputs
    will still be a major challenge

25
For More Information
  • OECD Multifunctionality Workshop
    (2001)http//www1.oecd.org/agr/mf/
  • OECD, Environmental Indicators for Agriculture
    (3-volume series)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com