Fair Use Agreement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Fair Use Agreement

Description:

Themis Palpanas. 1. VLDB - Aug 2004. Fair Use Agreement ... Eamonn Keogh, Themis Palpanas Victor B. Zordan,Dimitrios Gunopulos ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: gp58
Learn more at: http://www.cs.ucr.edu
Category:
Tags: agreement | fair | themis | use

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fair Use Agreement


1
Fair Use Agreement
  • This agreement covers the use of all slides on
    this CD-Rom, please read carefully.
  • You may freely use these slides for teaching, if
  • You send me an email telling me the class
    number/ university in advance.
  • My name and email address appears on the first
    slide (if you are using all or most of the
    slides), or on each slide (if you are just taking
    a few slides).
  • You may freely use these slides for a conference
    presentation, if
  • You send me an email telling me the conference
    name in advance.
  • My name appears on each slide you use.
  • You may not use these slides for tutorials, or
    in a published work (tech report/ conference
    paper/ thesis/ journal etc). If you wish to do
    this, email me first, it is highly likely I will
    grant you permission.
  • (c) Eamonn Keogh, eamonn_at_cs.ucr.edu

2
Indexing Large Human-Motion Databases
  • Eamonn Keogh, Themis Palpanas Victor B.
    Zordan,Dimitrios Gunopulos
  • University of California, Riverside
  • Marc Cardle
  • University of Cambridge

3
Motion Capture
  • records motion data from live actors

4
Motion Capture
  • records motion data from live actors
  • used for data-driven animation

5
Motion Capture in Games Industry
Street NBA
Madden
6
Motion Capture in Movie Industry
Troy
Lord of the Rings
7
Motivation
  • motion capture data
  • segmented in short sequences, stored in motion
    libraries
  • composed to create long, realistic motion
    sequences
  • important to find similar sequences
  • form pool of similar sequences
  • choose the most promising, to continue the motion

8
Motivation
  • Dynamic Time Warping (DTW)
  • Considers only local adjustments in time, to
    match two time series
  • However sometimes global adjustments are required
  • DTW is being extensively used
  • uniform scaling is complementary
  • combination of both techniques offers rich,
    high-quality result set

Uniform Scaling
DTW
9
Uniform Scaling
  • time series
  • query, Q, length n
  • candidate, C, length m (mgtn)



10
Uniform Scaling
  • time series
  • query, Q, length n
  • candidate, C, length m (mgtn)
  • stretch Q to length p (npm) Qp
  • Qpj Qjn/p, 1 j p
  • scaling factor, sf p/n
  • max scaling factor, sfmax m/n



Qp
11
Problem Statement
  • given
  • time series, Q
  • database of candidate time series, D
  • find argminp dist(Qp, D )
  • dist(Qp, D ) Euclidean Distance between time
    series

12
Problem Statement
  • given
  • time series, Q
  • database of candidate time series, D
  • find argminp dist(Qp, D )
  • dist(Qp, D ) Euclidean Distance between time
    series
  • challenges
  • quickly solve the problem for two time series
  • extend solution to scale-up to large time series
    databases

13
Outline
  • Speeding Up Search
  • Scaling Up To Large Databases
  • Experimental Evaluation
  • Related Work
  • Conclusions

14
Best Uniform Scaling Match
  • brute force algorithm
  • for each time series in D
  • for each sf, 1 sf sfmax
  • compute distance between the two time
    series
  • find the best overall match
  • time complexity O(D(m-n))
  • extremely expensive!

15
Lower Bounding Uniform Scaling
  • lower bound distance between two time series,
  • for any sf, 1 sf sfmax
  • desiderata
  • fast to compute
  • tight bound
  • results in fast pruning of candidates that are
    guaranteed not to belong to the solution
  • compute distance only for time series not pruned
    by lower bound

16
Lower Bounding Uniform Scaling
  • assume
  • candidate C, length 100
  • query Q, length 80
  • wish to find best match for any
  • scaling of Q between 80-100

C
m 100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
17
Lower Bounding Uniform Scaling
  • assume
  • candidate C, length 100
  • query Q, length 80
  • wish to find best match for any
  • scaling of Q between 80-100
  • build envelopes, length 80

U
n 80
Ui max( C ?(i-1)m/n? 1,, C ?im/n? )
Li min( C ?(i-1)m/n? 1,, C ?im/n? )
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
18
Lower Bounding Uniform Scaling
Q
  • assume
  • candidate C, length 100
  • query Q, length 80
  • wish to find best match for any
  • scaling of Q between 80-100
  • build envelopes, length 80

Ui max( C ?(i-1)m/n? 1,, C ?im/n? )
Li min( C ?(i-1)m/n? 1,, C ?im/n? )
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
19
Lower Bounding Uniform Scaling
  • assume
  • candidate C, length 100
  • query Q, length 80
  • wish to find best match for any
  • scaling of Q between 80-100
  • build envelopes, length 80

Ui max( C ?(i-1)m/n? 1,, C ?im/n? )
Li min( C ?(i-1)m/n? 1,, C ?im/n? )
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
20
Lower Bounding Uniform Scaling
  • assume
  • candidate C, length 100
  • query Q, length 80
  • wish to find best match for any
  • scaling of Q between 80-100
  • compute lower bound

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
21
Envelope Indexing
  • dimensionality of envelopes is high

80 points
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
22
Envelope Indexing
  • dimensionality of envelopes is high
  • reduce dimensionality by approximating them
  • Piecewise Constant Approximation

8 points
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
23
Envelope Indexing
  • dimensionality of envelopes is high
  • reduce dimensionality by approximating them
  • Piecewise Constant Approximation
  • assume query Q, length 80

Q
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
24
Envelope Indexing
  • dimensionality of envelopes is high
  • reduce dimensionality by approximating them
  • Piecewise Constant Approximation
  • assume query Q, length 80
  • we approximate it with 8 points


0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
25
Envelope Indexing
  • dimensionality of envelopes is high
  • reduce dimensionality by approximating them
  • Piecewise Constant Approximation
  • assume query Q, length 80
  • approximated with 8 points
  • compute approximation of
  • lower bound


0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
26
Algorithms for Secondary Storage
  • use a multidimensional index
  • VA-file -gt FastScan algorithm
  • R-tree -gt RtreeProbe algorithm
  • 2-pass algorithms
  • 1. scan approximated envelopes,
  • prune search space
  • 2. find exact answer using original series

27
Outline
  • Speeding Up Search
  • Scaling Up To Large Databases
  • Experimental Evaluation
  • Related Work
  • Conclusions

28
Datasets Used
  • motion capture
  • data from 124 sensors placed on human actors
  • mixed bag
  • time series coming from
  • medicine, manufacturing, environmental
    monitoring, economics, sensor data
  • experimented with time series databases of
  • size 5,000 80,000
  • time series length 64 1,024 points

29
Main Memory Experiments
  • assume database fits in memory
  • measure pruning power
  • fraction of times each approach calls distance
    function
  • our technique
  • 1 order of magnitude
  • faster than CD-criterion

30
Main Memory Experiments
brute force
  • assume database fits in memory
  • measure pruning power
  • fraction of times each approach calls distance
    function
  • our technique
  • 1 order of magnitude
  • faster than CD-criterion
  • 3 orders of magnitude
  • faster than brute force

31
Disk-Based Experiments
  • comparison of
  • brute force
  • FastScan
  • RtreeProbe

32
Disk-Based Experiments
  • comparison of
  • FastScan
  • RtreeProbe

33
Disk-Based Experiments
  • comparison of
  • FastScan
  • RtreeProbe

34
Case Study
  • video

35
Outline
  • Speeding Up Search
  • Scaling Up To Large Databases
  • Experimental Evaluation
  • Related Work
  • Conclusions

36
Related Work
  • Dynamic Time Warping (DTW)
  • Yi Faloutsos00Keogh02Zhu
    Shasha03Fung Wong03
  • Longest Common SubSequence (LCSS)
  • Das et al.97Vlachos et al.03
  • uniform scaling
  • Argyros Ermopoulos03

37
Outline
  • Speeding Up Search
  • Scaling Up To Large Databases
  • Experimental Evaluation
  • Related Work
  • Conclusions

38
Conclusions
  • studied utility of uniform scaling similarity
    matching
  • applications in
  • motion capture libraries, music retrieval,
    historical handwritten archives
  • introduced first lower bounding technique
  • proposed indexing method for bounding envelopes
  • suitable for very large time series databases
  • experimentally evaluated efficiency of technique
  • demonstrated quality of results with real motion
    capture data

39
Outline
40
Lower Bounding Uniform Scaling
  • assume
  • candidate C, length 100
  • query Q, length 80
  • wish to find best match for any
  • scaling of Q between 80-100
  • build envelopes, length 80

Ui max( C ?(i-1)m/n? 1,, C ?im/n? )
Li min( C ?(i-1)m/n? 1,, C ?im/n? )
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com