Financing Costs and the CFA Franc: a Promise yet to be Fulfilled Nicolas Pinaud - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Financing Costs and the CFA Franc: a Promise yet to be Fulfilled Nicolas Pinaud

Description:

... mismatch & lower solvency risk ... Lower the solvency risk premium charged to non ... currency mismatch, i.e. lower solvency risk and default premium ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: chrisd133
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Financing Costs and the CFA Franc: a Promise yet to be Fulfilled Nicolas Pinaud


1
Financing Costs and the CFA Franc a Promise
yet to be FulfilledNicolas Pinaud
"Macroeconomic Policy in the Franc Zone What can
the European Central Bank learn from
Africa?" February 21, 2006 Paris
2
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Expected Benefits
  • A peg is conducive to a more stable real
    effective exchange rate (REER)
  • Fixed nominal exchange rate
  • Lower inflation

3
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Expected Benefits
  • Reduced currency mismatch lower solvency risk
  • The bulk of ODA provided to UEMOA/CEMAC
    countries, and therefore the greater part of
    their external debt, are denominated in SDR,
    and

4
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Expected Benefits
  • A lower (if not zero) currency-risk premium on
    local-currency denominated financing
  • Breakdown of debt cost for a borrower in local
    currency on the local bond market

5
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Expected Benefits
  • A lower (if not zero) currency-risk premium on
    local-currency denominated financing
  • Fixed nominal exchange rate supp. of foreign
    investment (esp. from euro-zone investors in the
    CFA Zone) in LC denominated assets no currency
    risk
  • Low inflation theoretically conducive to higher
    domestic savings

6
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Expected Benefits
  • A limited transfer risk (principle of free
    transferability)
  • Lower the solvency risk premium charged to
    non-sovereign entities
  • Makes it easier, in principle, for WAEMU / CAEMC
    corporations to "pierce" the sovereign ceiling
  • Transfer risk is usually a strong deterrent to
    foreign investment

7
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Expected Benefits
  • Potentially, since 1999, an even larger capital
    pool accessible to CFA-zone entities the
    Euro-zone
  • Quasi local-currency financing for CFA zone
    entities no currency mismatch, i.e. lower
    solvency risk and default premium
  • One of the world broadest and deepest financial
    centre high liquidity (no liquidity premium) and
    high appetite for risk
  • Top legal standards no jurisdiction premium

8
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Mixed Outcome
  • UEMOA countries' sovereign short term bond issues
    are gaining in importance (together with
    declining coupons)
  • State-owned companies BOAD, Port Autonome de
    Dakar, Communauté Electrique du Benin
  • ? Average maturity of 7 years, 5.35 - 6.5
    coupons
  • Large UEMOA corporations are also issuing debt at
    relatively low cost Nestlé (Ivory Coast),
    TELECEL (Burkina) and SHELTER Afrique (Senegal)
  • ? Average maturity of 5 years and coupon between
    6 and 7.25

9
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Mixed Outcome
  • However, local financial systems remain extremely
    shallow
  • Low domestic saving rates
  • Limited competition in the banking sector,
    limited role in the financing of the local
    economy

10
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Mixed Outcome
  • However, local financial systems remain extremely
    shallow
  • Illiquid financial markets
  • BRVM very small Market Cap
  • Velocity of circulation on the BRVM equity market
    is the lowest in Africa (1.8 in 2004 / 47 in
    the JSE)
  • Hardly any bond trading, no real secondary bond
    market

11
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Mixed Outcome
  • However, local financial systems remain extremely
    shallow
  • Illiquid financial markets

12
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Elements of
Explanation
  • Is the peg really credible?
  • On the face of it, yes it is (guarantee of the
    French Treasury, de facto currency board)
  • However recurrent rumours of devaluation the
    1994 devaluation has set a precedent
  • Is there an implicit currency premium? Apparently
    not

13
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Elements of
Explanation
  • WAEMU CAEMC sovereign still perceived as
    fragile obligors by foreign investors
  • Poor track record
  • Structurally flimsy public finances (limits of
    the HIPC initiative) and low ratings (Fitch
    SPs)
  • From CCC (Cameroon)
  • to B at best (Senegal / Benin)
  • No investment grade
  • High country risk in general (Ivory Coast as a
    case-in-point)

14
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Elements of
Explanation
  • Little developed corporate sector
  • Limited liquidity of debt instruments /
    preeminence of commercial loans
  • The very few bond issuances can be underwritten
    locally
  • Poor legal and business environment in the WAEMU
    and CAEMC high jurisdiction premium requested by
    foreign investors
  • Poor corporate governance / Stringent listing
    requirements and expensive fees in the euro-zone
    for bond issues

15
Cost of Capital in the CFA Area Conclusion
  • The peg is potentially a useful instrument to
    reduce capital costs in the CFA franc zone
  • Yet, the other components of the country risk
    premium tend to nullify the benefits of the peg
  • ? The CFA peg is no "magic bullet" to deepen
    WAEMU and CAEMC financial systems and to reduce
    capital costs in the region
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com