CONTRIBUTION OF KHADREP 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

CONTRIBUTION OF KHADREP 1

Description:

Various organizations were supported to implement various activities throughout ... Mistrust,competion and suspicion among CBOs (unwillingness to share information ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: rmu5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CONTRIBUTION OF KHADREP 1


1
CONTRIBUTION OF KHADREP 1
  • Various organizations were supported to implement
    various activities throughout the country at the
    community level.

2
Introduction
  • Definition of community
  • For the purpose of this presentation, the word
    community refers to
  • People, organizations, structures at the
    decentralized levels.

3
The supported programmes focused mainly on the
following areas
  • Advocacy and prevention
  • Treatment care and support for the infected and
    affected
  • Mitigation of the socio-economic impact of
    HIV/AIDS

4
PROGRESS
  • Communities empowered to participate in HIV/AIDS
    prevention strategies
  • Region with high level of awareness have moved on
    to include other strategies like treatment, care
    and support for the infected and affected
  • Increased campaign, free discussion and
    acceptance of HIV/AIDS interventions at the
    community level.
  • Some networking and collaborative meetings,
    forums for joint planning, prioritization and
    management.

5
CHALLENGES
  • Insufficient capacity among implementing
    organizations and community structures (CACCs and
    DTCs)
  • Wrong perception of CACCs by communities as
    financing organs
  • Mistrust,competion and suspicion among CBOs
    (unwillingness to share information among
    different groups)
  • Duplication of programmes and activities among
    CBOs
  • Limited availability of comprehensive care
    services at the community level.

6
LESSONS
  • The already increased advocacy for attitude and
    behavioral change needs to be sustained.
  • Irrespective of increased advocacy and awareness,
    stigma is still high and more needs to be done.
  • Capacity differences among groups/organizations/in
    stitutions hinders establishment of partnerships
    amongst stakeholders thus the need to enhance
    support for co-ordination efforts.
  • Role of MPs-support versus interference continues
    to be a challenge
  • Need for Donor co-ordination to harmonize funding
    at the community level.

7
  • MAP II RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT

8
RECOMMENDED SUPPORT AREAS
  • Community mobilization efforts
  • Emphasis on support for capacity development and
    empowerment of communities with a view of
    ensuring sustainability of programmes.
  • scale-up of community programs especially
    targeting previously marginalized areas and
    focusing on highly vulnerable groups and high
    impacted groups e.g. girls,women and orphans.
  • Aim at ensuring quality of community
    interventions as opposed to quantity.
  • Enhancing community partnerships through
    networking and collaboration

9
Institutional strengthening for community
participation and development
  • Capacity needs assessements for CACCs and DTCs
  • Provision of support for capacity building for
    the AIDS decentralized structures-CACCs and DTCs
    based on identified capacity gaps.
  • Leadership training and programme support
    including financial management, disbursement, and
    audits and M E.
  • Improving coordination between district and
    constituency-level structures.

10
3. Research
  • Identification of priority needs per region to
    determine type and focus of interventions.
  • Rapid assesements of the number and level of
    priority focus groups (vulnerable
    groups)-OVCs.young girls etc (as in the KNASP)
  • Situational analysis to determine all
    implementing organizations and the nature of
    their activities at the community level.
  • better documentation of implementation processes
    strategies lessons learnt and impact of
    interventions
  • Impact assesements
  • Identification of best practices with a view of
    enhancing support to these organizations.

11
4. Monitoring and Evaluation (ME)
  • Support the decentralized structures-CACCS and
    DTCs undertake regular monitoring of community
    programmes.

12
Financial support to community initiatives
  • This should be based on the priority areas and
    focus identified per region and based on the
    KNASP focus areas as outlined below
  • Prevent new infections,
  • Improve the quality of life of those infected and
    affected, and
  • Mitigate the socio-economic impact of the epidemic
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com