Development, Climate and Energy Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


PPT – Development, Climate and Energy Project PowerPoint presentation | free to view - id: 12a9e1-ZmM4M


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation

Development, Climate and Energy Project


Draughts (enhanced energy requirements for irrigation and drinking water ... Risks and uncertainty (e.g. extreme events, draughts) Analytical framework ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: unep8


Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Development, Climate and Energy Project

Development, Climate and Energy Project Thematic
Area 3 Linking Mitigation and Adaptation
Amit Garg and Kirsten Halsnæs
Presentation for First Project Meeting 13
February 2005, Paris
Presentation Sequence
  • Outline of AR4, WG-2, Chapter 18 on Inter-
  • Relationships between Adaptation and
  • Issues for consideration
  • Analytical frameworks
  • Proposed outline of TA-3

Chapter 18, WG-2, AR4 Contents
  • Introduction
  • Background and rationale
  • Structure of the chapter
  • Summary of relevant knowledge in IPCC TAR
  • Framing the decision problem
  • Inter-relationships between adaptation and
  • Trade-offs and synergies
  • Climate policy and institutions
  • Response capacity

Contents contd.
  • Adaptation, mitigation and international
  • Multilateral environmental agreements
  • Other agreements and mechanisms
  • Adaptation, mitigation and development
  • Response capacity and development pathways
  • Adaptation, mitigation and sustainable
  • Adaptation, mitigation and sustainable
    development the decision problem
  • Information needs
  • Uncertainties, unknowns and knowledge
  • Priorities for research
  • Conclusions

Key Messages
  • On a global scale, climate policy is not about
    the question of whether to
  • mitigate climate change or to adapt to it.
    Both are necessary.
  • Whilst there are many differences between
    adaptation and mitigation, the
  • two options are inter-related in at least
    three important ways (prevent
  • dangerous anthropogenic interference,
    international negotiations,
  • development pathways)
  • Analysis of the inter-relationships between
    adaptation and mitigation
  • may promote the effective implementation of
    climate policy
  • Links with other international agreements and
  • Information needs

Examples of mitigation and adaptation linkages
  • Air conditioning and heat waves
  • Rural Electrification Programme with Solar Energy
    in Remote Region
  • Strategy for Promotions and Development of
    Renewable Technologies in
  • Bangladesh Experience from Grameen Shakti
  • Renewable Energy Technologies for Fuelwood
    Conservation in the Indian
  • Himalayan Region
  • Experimental Study of Using Renewable Energy in
    the Rural Areas of Oman
  • The Potential for Bioenergy Production from
    Australian Forests, its Contribution to
  • National Greenhouse targets and Recent
    Developments in Conversion Processes
  • Afforestation and GHG Mitigation in Brazil
  • Ethanol and biodiesel
  • Horse-power Urban domestic recycling and the
    development of sustainable local
  • community structures
  • Community forest management in Mexico

TA-3 Issues for Consideration
Climate change impacts, vulnerability, and
adaptation in the energy sector with a special
emphasis given to linkages between adaptation and
mitigation policies in the energy sector.
  • Differences, similarities and trade-offs between
    mitigation and adaptation
  • Possible linkages in the energy sector
  • Common driving forces at national policy level
  • Ascertain common risks and uncertainty
  • Develop an analytical framework
  • Modelling efforts
  • Apply framework to country case studies
  • Institutional issues

Differences betweenMitigation and Adaptation
  • Mitigation policy is more global involving many
    countries, adaptation is
  • more within a country and local
  • Costs of mitigation arise locally while its
    benefits are dispersed globally.
  • For adaptation both accrue locally
  • Time frames (mitigation decades to centuries,
    adaptation years to decades)
  • Time delays between action and results
    (mitigation larger, adaptation
  • much shorter)
  • Implementation mechanisms

Similarities betweenMitigation and Adaptation
  • Overlapping issues while conceptualizing
    Adaptive and Mitigative capacities
  • Help prevent dangerous anthropogenic
    interference with the climate
  • systems
  • Common concerns such as market failures
  • Common solutions such as renewable energy,
    afforestation, market
  • development
  • Linkages with development pathways
  • Subject of international negotiations on climate
    policy and related
  • institutions

Trade-offs between Mitigation and Adaptation
  • Mitigation expenditure may divert social or
    private resources and may
  • reduce funds available for adaptation (e.g.
    investment to develop
  • agriculture infrastructure for poor and
    marginal farmers)
  • If mitigating carbon emissions enhances dirty
    biomass use in rural areas
  • thus increasing indoor air pollution and
  • If adaptation implies more energy use (space
    cooling, heating) from
  • carbon intensive resources, it affects
    mitigation efforts negatively

Possible linkages in the energy sector
  • Energy Access
  • Energy efficiency
  • Renewable energy sources (e.g. afforestation for
    energy crops, biofuels offer
  • mitigation and higher employment per unit of
    energy generated, biogas based lighting
  • and cooking, irrigation water pumping using
    solar/ wind, biodiesel based generators)
  • New energy sources (e.g. hydrogen)
  • Transportation (e.g. better roads and
    infrastructure reduce fuel consumption and
  • improve access to markets, GHG and local
    pollutants links and disjoints)
  • The costs and the reduction potential of the
    wind energy depend on the power
  • market, grids, land costs, financial markets
    etc. Many of these context specific
  • issues also influence how adaptation
    measures like irrigation and improved
  • management practices can be implemented in
  • ??

Some common driving forces
  • Land reforms
  • Access to commodity markets
  • Access to financial markets (would facilitate
    access to insurance sector)
  • Access to energy and electricity markets
  • Governance profile (local/ regional/ central

Common risks and uncertainty
  • Some examples
  • Extreme events on coasts (energy infrastructure
    and coastal populations)
  • Draughts (enhanced energy requirements for
    irrigation and drinking water
  • access, marginal farmers badly affected)
  • Explore common solutions by applying
    precautionary principles
  • Access to insurance systems (private and
  • Hedging strategies (e.g. low water crops)
  • Inclusion of low-probability events in risk

Modelling efforts
  • SRES and stabilization scenario results for
    energy efficiency, renewable, and new energy
  • technology penetrations
  • Identify winner RE technologies that are
    projected to have highest shares under
  • various scenarios in the project
    participating countries, estimated range of
  • affected directly due to enhanced RE
  • Mitigation potential assessment, role of
    renewable technologies for each country, sectoral
  • and regional flexibility in mitigation
    indicating sectors/ regions that may supply more
  • credits at lower carbon prices
  • Employment generation potential for each country
  • Costs and investments
  • Estimate adaptive capacity enhancement??
  • Develop indicators for linking mitigation and
    adaptation (qualitative and quantitative)

Institutional issues
  • Regulatory frameworks and policy regimes
  • Stakeholder management
  • Barriers to linkages social, technological,
    financial, implementation
  • Stimulate public-private partnerships
  • How to replicate national successful case
  • Integrated National CC Policies
  • Role of international institutions

Analytical frameworks
The sequential nature of the climate policy
Source ZOD Chapter 18 of WG-2, AR4
Adaptation, mitigation and development paths
Source ZOD Chapter 18 of WG-2, AR4
Climate policy decision-making and development
Source ZOD Chapter 18 of WG-2, AR4
Linkages between response capacity and desired
adaptation and mitigation
TAR figure on SD, adaptation and mitigation
Integrated Assessment Framework India Study
  • Prime issues identified are national emission
    assessment of local and global pollutants, and
    assessment of impacts on natural and human
  • These interactions and their results are modified
    and managed by the socio-economic development
    paths selected by the country.

Interactions between the climate, natural and the
socio-economic systems and the relationships to
SD and adaptation-mitigation
Analytic Framework for Case Studies

Proposed Outline of TA-3
  • Overview
  • Why to link mitigation and adaptation?
  • Differences, similarities and trade-offs
  • Development pathways
  • Energy sector related adaptation and mitigation
    concerns in developing countries
  • What is at stake? (Extent of impacts in the
    participating countries)
  • Existing adaptation policies and measures
  • GHG emission projections from the energy sector
  • Possible linkages in the energy sector
  • Energy access
  • Energy efficiency
  • Water
  • Renewable energy sources
  • New energy sources
  • Transport
  • Wind and others